Cargando…
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM
BACKGROUND: Peer reviewed research is paramount to the advancement of science. Ideally, the peer review process is an unbiased, fair assessment of the scientific merit and credibility of a study; however, well-documented biases arise in all methods of peer review. Systemic biases have been shown to...
Autores principales: | Silbiger, Nyssa J., Stubler, Amber D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844596 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management
por: Cho, Alyssa H., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review
por: Gerwing, Travis G., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Physician Perspectives on Reducing Curative Cancer Treatment Intensity for Populations Underrepresented in Clinical Trials
por: Rocque, Gabrielle B, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
por: Rogers, Wendy, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Ethics of editorial and peer review
por: Mandal, Jharna, et al.
Publicado: (2012)