Cargando…
“Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
BACKGROUND: Sit-stand desk interventions have the potential to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour and improve employee health. However, the extent of sit-stand desk use varies between employees and in different organisational contexts. Framed by organisational cultural theory and product design th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9 |
_version_ | 1783480615302070272 |
---|---|
author | Hall, Jennifer Kay, Tess McConnell, Alison Mansfield, Louise |
author_facet | Hall, Jennifer Kay, Tess McConnell, Alison Mansfield, Louise |
author_sort | Hall, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sit-stand desk interventions have the potential to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour and improve employee health. However, the extent of sit-stand desk use varies between employees and in different organisational contexts. Framed by organisational cultural theory and product design theory, this study examined employees’ lived experience of taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention, to understand the processes influencing feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Participant observations and qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 employees from two office-based workplaces in the UK, as part of a process evaluation that ran alongside a pilot RCT of a workplace sit-stand desk intervention. Observational field notes and transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes related to the experience of using a sit-stand desk at work were generated: employees’ relationship with their sit-stand desk; aspirations and outcomes related to employee health and productivity; and cultural norms and interpersonal relationships. The perceived usability of the desk varied depending on how employees interacted with the desk within their personal and organisational context. Employees reported that the perceived influence of the desk on their productivity levels shaped use of the desk; those who perceived that standing increased energy and alertness tended to stand more often. Sit-stand desks were voiced as being more acceptable than intervention strategies that involve leaving the desk, as productivity was conflated with being at the desk. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a range of organisational, social-cultural and individual-level factors that shape the feasibility and acceptability of sit-stand desk use, and suggest strategies for improving employees’ experiences of using a sit-stand desk at work, which might positively influence sedentary behaviour reduction and health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02172599, 22nd June 2014 (prospectively registered). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6918567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69185672019-12-20 “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention Hall, Jennifer Kay, Tess McConnell, Alison Mansfield, Louise BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Sit-stand desk interventions have the potential to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour and improve employee health. However, the extent of sit-stand desk use varies between employees and in different organisational contexts. Framed by organisational cultural theory and product design theory, this study examined employees’ lived experience of taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention, to understand the processes influencing feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Participant observations and qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 employees from two office-based workplaces in the UK, as part of a process evaluation that ran alongside a pilot RCT of a workplace sit-stand desk intervention. Observational field notes and transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes related to the experience of using a sit-stand desk at work were generated: employees’ relationship with their sit-stand desk; aspirations and outcomes related to employee health and productivity; and cultural norms and interpersonal relationships. The perceived usability of the desk varied depending on how employees interacted with the desk within their personal and organisational context. Employees reported that the perceived influence of the desk on their productivity levels shaped use of the desk; those who perceived that standing increased energy and alertness tended to stand more often. Sit-stand desks were voiced as being more acceptable than intervention strategies that involve leaving the desk, as productivity was conflated with being at the desk. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a range of organisational, social-cultural and individual-level factors that shape the feasibility and acceptability of sit-stand desk use, and suggest strategies for improving employees’ experiences of using a sit-stand desk at work, which might positively influence sedentary behaviour reduction and health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02172599, 22nd June 2014 (prospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6918567/ /pubmed/31847821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hall, Jennifer Kay, Tess McConnell, Alison Mansfield, Louise “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
title | “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
title_full | “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
title_fullStr | “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
title_short | “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
title_sort | “why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halljennifer whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention AT kaytess whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention AT mcconnellalison whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention AT mansfieldlouise whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention |