Cargando…

“Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention

BACKGROUND: Sit-stand desk interventions have the potential to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour and improve employee health. However, the extent of sit-stand desk use varies between employees and in different organisational contexts. Framed by organisational cultural theory and product design th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Jennifer, Kay, Tess, McConnell, Alison, Mansfield, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9
_version_ 1783480615302070272
author Hall, Jennifer
Kay, Tess
McConnell, Alison
Mansfield, Louise
author_facet Hall, Jennifer
Kay, Tess
McConnell, Alison
Mansfield, Louise
author_sort Hall, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sit-stand desk interventions have the potential to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour and improve employee health. However, the extent of sit-stand desk use varies between employees and in different organisational contexts. Framed by organisational cultural theory and product design theory, this study examined employees’ lived experience of taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention, to understand the processes influencing feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Participant observations and qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 employees from two office-based workplaces in the UK, as part of a process evaluation that ran alongside a pilot RCT of a workplace sit-stand desk intervention. Observational field notes and transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes related to the experience of using a sit-stand desk at work were generated: employees’ relationship with their sit-stand desk; aspirations and outcomes related to employee health and productivity; and cultural norms and interpersonal relationships. The perceived usability of the desk varied depending on how employees interacted with the desk within their personal and organisational context. Employees reported that the perceived influence of the desk on their productivity levels shaped use of the desk; those who perceived that standing increased energy and alertness tended to stand more often. Sit-stand desks were voiced as being more acceptable than intervention strategies that involve leaving the desk, as productivity was conflated with being at the desk. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a range of organisational, social-cultural and individual-level factors that shape the feasibility and acceptability of sit-stand desk use, and suggest strategies for improving employees’ experiences of using a sit-stand desk at work, which might positively influence sedentary behaviour reduction and health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02172599, 22nd June 2014 (prospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6918567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69185672019-12-20 “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention Hall, Jennifer Kay, Tess McConnell, Alison Mansfield, Louise BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Sit-stand desk interventions have the potential to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour and improve employee health. However, the extent of sit-stand desk use varies between employees and in different organisational contexts. Framed by organisational cultural theory and product design theory, this study examined employees’ lived experience of taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention, to understand the processes influencing feasibility and acceptability. METHODS: Participant observations and qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 employees from two office-based workplaces in the UK, as part of a process evaluation that ran alongside a pilot RCT of a workplace sit-stand desk intervention. Observational field notes and transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes related to the experience of using a sit-stand desk at work were generated: employees’ relationship with their sit-stand desk; aspirations and outcomes related to employee health and productivity; and cultural norms and interpersonal relationships. The perceived usability of the desk varied depending on how employees interacted with the desk within their personal and organisational context. Employees reported that the perceived influence of the desk on their productivity levels shaped use of the desk; those who perceived that standing increased energy and alertness tended to stand more often. Sit-stand desks were voiced as being more acceptable than intervention strategies that involve leaving the desk, as productivity was conflated with being at the desk. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a range of organisational, social-cultural and individual-level factors that shape the feasibility and acceptability of sit-stand desk use, and suggest strategies for improving employees’ experiences of using a sit-stand desk at work, which might positively influence sedentary behaviour reduction and health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02172599, 22nd June 2014 (prospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6918567/ /pubmed/31847821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hall, Jennifer
Kay, Tess
McConnell, Alison
Mansfield, Louise
“Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
title “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
title_full “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
title_fullStr “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
title_full_unstemmed “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
title_short “Why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
title_sort “why would you want to stand?” an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9
work_keys_str_mv AT halljennifer whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention
AT kaytess whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention
AT mcconnellalison whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention
AT mansfieldlouise whywouldyouwanttostandanaccountofthelivedexperienceofemployeestakingpartinaworkplacesitstanddeskintervention