Cargando…

Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats

Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to restore lung volumes and improve respiratory function in obesity. However, the biological impact of different PEEP levels on the lungs in obesity remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O versus PE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maia, Lígia de A., Fernandes, Marcos V. S., Santos, Raquel S., Agra, Laís C., Carvalho, Anna Carolinna, Rocha, Nazareth de N., Oliveira, Milena V., Santos, Cíntia L., Morales, Marcelo M., Capelozzi, Vera L., Souza, Sergio A. L., Gutfilen, Bianca, Schultz, Marcus J., Gama de Abreu, Marcelo, Pelosi, Paolo, Silva, Pedro L., Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513
_version_ 1783482983769964544
author Maia, Lígia de A.
Fernandes, Marcos V. S.
Santos, Raquel S.
Agra, Laís C.
Carvalho, Anna Carolinna
Rocha, Nazareth de N.
Oliveira, Milena V.
Santos, Cíntia L.
Morales, Marcelo M.
Capelozzi, Vera L.
Souza, Sergio A. L.
Gutfilen, Bianca
Schultz, Marcus J.
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Pelosi, Paolo
Silva, Pedro L.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
author_facet Maia, Lígia de A.
Fernandes, Marcos V. S.
Santos, Raquel S.
Agra, Laís C.
Carvalho, Anna Carolinna
Rocha, Nazareth de N.
Oliveira, Milena V.
Santos, Cíntia L.
Morales, Marcelo M.
Capelozzi, Vera L.
Souza, Sergio A. L.
Gutfilen, Bianca
Schultz, Marcus J.
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Pelosi, Paolo
Silva, Pedro L.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
author_sort Maia, Lígia de A.
collection PubMed
description Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to restore lung volumes and improve respiratory function in obesity. However, the biological impact of different PEEP levels on the lungs in obesity remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O versus PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O during ventilation with low tidal volumes on lung function, histology, and biological markers in obese and non-obese rats undergoing open abdominal surgery. Forty-two Wistar rats (21 obese, 21 non-obese) were anesthetized and tracheotomized, and laparotomy was performed with standardized bowel manipulation. Rats were randomly ventilated with protective tidal volume (7 ml/kg) at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O or PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O for 4 h, after which they were euthanized. Lung mechanics and histology, alveolar epithelial cell integrity, and biological markers associated with pulmonary inflammation, alveolar stretch, extracellular matrix, and epithelial and endothelial cell damage were analyzed. In obese rats, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O was associated with less alveolar collapse (p = 0.02). E-cadherin expression was not different between the two PEEP groups. Gene expressions of interleukin (IL)-6 (p = 0.01) and type III procollagen (p = 0.004), as well as protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p = 0.016), were lower at PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O than at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O. In non-obese animals, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O led to increased hyperinflation, reduced e-cadherin (p = 0.04), and increased gene expression of IL-6 (p = 0.004) and protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p-0.029), but no changes in fibrogenesis. In conclusion, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O reduced lung damage and inflammation in an experimental model of mechanical ventilation for open abdominal surgery, but only in obese animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6930834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69308342020-01-09 Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats Maia, Lígia de A. Fernandes, Marcos V. S. Santos, Raquel S. Agra, Laís C. Carvalho, Anna Carolinna Rocha, Nazareth de N. Oliveira, Milena V. Santos, Cíntia L. Morales, Marcelo M. Capelozzi, Vera L. Souza, Sergio A. L. Gutfilen, Bianca Schultz, Marcus J. Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Pelosi, Paolo Silva, Pedro L. Rocco, Patricia R. M. Front Physiol Physiology Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to restore lung volumes and improve respiratory function in obesity. However, the biological impact of different PEEP levels on the lungs in obesity remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O versus PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O during ventilation with low tidal volumes on lung function, histology, and biological markers in obese and non-obese rats undergoing open abdominal surgery. Forty-two Wistar rats (21 obese, 21 non-obese) were anesthetized and tracheotomized, and laparotomy was performed with standardized bowel manipulation. Rats were randomly ventilated with protective tidal volume (7 ml/kg) at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O or PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O for 4 h, after which they were euthanized. Lung mechanics and histology, alveolar epithelial cell integrity, and biological markers associated with pulmonary inflammation, alveolar stretch, extracellular matrix, and epithelial and endothelial cell damage were analyzed. In obese rats, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O was associated with less alveolar collapse (p = 0.02). E-cadherin expression was not different between the two PEEP groups. Gene expressions of interleukin (IL)-6 (p = 0.01) and type III procollagen (p = 0.004), as well as protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p = 0.016), were lower at PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O than at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O. In non-obese animals, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O led to increased hyperinflation, reduced e-cadherin (p = 0.04), and increased gene expression of IL-6 (p = 0.004) and protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p-0.029), but no changes in fibrogenesis. In conclusion, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O reduced lung damage and inflammation in an experimental model of mechanical ventilation for open abdominal surgery, but only in obese animals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6930834/ /pubmed/31920717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513 Text en Copyright © 2019 Maia, Fernandes, Santos, Agra, Carvalho, Rocha, Oliveira, Santos, Morales, Capelozzi, Souza, Gutfilen, Schultz, Gama de Abreu, Pelosi, Silva and Rocco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Maia, Lígia de A.
Fernandes, Marcos V. S.
Santos, Raquel S.
Agra, Laís C.
Carvalho, Anna Carolinna
Rocha, Nazareth de N.
Oliveira, Milena V.
Santos, Cíntia L.
Morales, Marcelo M.
Capelozzi, Vera L.
Souza, Sergio A. L.
Gutfilen, Bianca
Schultz, Marcus J.
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Pelosi, Paolo
Silva, Pedro L.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
title Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
title_full Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
title_fullStr Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
title_short Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
title_sort effects of protective mechanical ventilation with different peep levels on alveolar damage and inflammation in a model of open abdominal surgery: a randomized study in obese versus non-obese rats
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513
work_keys_str_mv AT maialigiadea effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT fernandesmarcosvs effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT santosraquels effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT agralaisc effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT carvalhoannacarolinna effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT rochanazarethden effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT oliveiramilenav effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT santoscintial effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT moralesmarcelom effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT capelozziveral effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT souzasergioal effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT gutfilenbianca effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT schultzmarcusj effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT gamadeabreumarcelo effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT pelosipaolo effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT silvapedrol effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats
AT roccopatriciarm effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats