Cargando…
Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats
Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to restore lung volumes and improve respiratory function in obesity. However, the biological impact of different PEEP levels on the lungs in obesity remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O versus PE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513 |
_version_ | 1783482983769964544 |
---|---|
author | Maia, Lígia de A. Fernandes, Marcos V. S. Santos, Raquel S. Agra, Laís C. Carvalho, Anna Carolinna Rocha, Nazareth de N. Oliveira, Milena V. Santos, Cíntia L. Morales, Marcelo M. Capelozzi, Vera L. Souza, Sergio A. L. Gutfilen, Bianca Schultz, Marcus J. Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Pelosi, Paolo Silva, Pedro L. Rocco, Patricia R. M. |
author_facet | Maia, Lígia de A. Fernandes, Marcos V. S. Santos, Raquel S. Agra, Laís C. Carvalho, Anna Carolinna Rocha, Nazareth de N. Oliveira, Milena V. Santos, Cíntia L. Morales, Marcelo M. Capelozzi, Vera L. Souza, Sergio A. L. Gutfilen, Bianca Schultz, Marcus J. Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Pelosi, Paolo Silva, Pedro L. Rocco, Patricia R. M. |
author_sort | Maia, Lígia de A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to restore lung volumes and improve respiratory function in obesity. However, the biological impact of different PEEP levels on the lungs in obesity remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O versus PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O during ventilation with low tidal volumes on lung function, histology, and biological markers in obese and non-obese rats undergoing open abdominal surgery. Forty-two Wistar rats (21 obese, 21 non-obese) were anesthetized and tracheotomized, and laparotomy was performed with standardized bowel manipulation. Rats were randomly ventilated with protective tidal volume (7 ml/kg) at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O or PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O for 4 h, after which they were euthanized. Lung mechanics and histology, alveolar epithelial cell integrity, and biological markers associated with pulmonary inflammation, alveolar stretch, extracellular matrix, and epithelial and endothelial cell damage were analyzed. In obese rats, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O was associated with less alveolar collapse (p = 0.02). E-cadherin expression was not different between the two PEEP groups. Gene expressions of interleukin (IL)-6 (p = 0.01) and type III procollagen (p = 0.004), as well as protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p = 0.016), were lower at PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O than at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O. In non-obese animals, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O led to increased hyperinflation, reduced e-cadherin (p = 0.04), and increased gene expression of IL-6 (p = 0.004) and protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p-0.029), but no changes in fibrogenesis. In conclusion, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O reduced lung damage and inflammation in an experimental model of mechanical ventilation for open abdominal surgery, but only in obese animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6930834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69308342020-01-09 Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats Maia, Lígia de A. Fernandes, Marcos V. S. Santos, Raquel S. Agra, Laís C. Carvalho, Anna Carolinna Rocha, Nazareth de N. Oliveira, Milena V. Santos, Cíntia L. Morales, Marcelo M. Capelozzi, Vera L. Souza, Sergio A. L. Gutfilen, Bianca Schultz, Marcus J. Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Pelosi, Paolo Silva, Pedro L. Rocco, Patricia R. M. Front Physiol Physiology Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to restore lung volumes and improve respiratory function in obesity. However, the biological impact of different PEEP levels on the lungs in obesity remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O versus PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O during ventilation with low tidal volumes on lung function, histology, and biological markers in obese and non-obese rats undergoing open abdominal surgery. Forty-two Wistar rats (21 obese, 21 non-obese) were anesthetized and tracheotomized, and laparotomy was performed with standardized bowel manipulation. Rats were randomly ventilated with protective tidal volume (7 ml/kg) at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O or PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O for 4 h, after which they were euthanized. Lung mechanics and histology, alveolar epithelial cell integrity, and biological markers associated with pulmonary inflammation, alveolar stretch, extracellular matrix, and epithelial and endothelial cell damage were analyzed. In obese rats, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O was associated with less alveolar collapse (p = 0.02). E-cadherin expression was not different between the two PEEP groups. Gene expressions of interleukin (IL)-6 (p = 0.01) and type III procollagen (p = 0.004), as well as protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p = 0.016), were lower at PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O than at PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O. In non-obese animals, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 2 cmH(2)O led to increased hyperinflation, reduced e-cadherin (p = 0.04), and increased gene expression of IL-6 (p = 0.004) and protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p-0.029), but no changes in fibrogenesis. In conclusion, PEEP = 6 cmH(2)O reduced lung damage and inflammation in an experimental model of mechanical ventilation for open abdominal surgery, but only in obese animals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6930834/ /pubmed/31920717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513 Text en Copyright © 2019 Maia, Fernandes, Santos, Agra, Carvalho, Rocha, Oliveira, Santos, Morales, Capelozzi, Souza, Gutfilen, Schultz, Gama de Abreu, Pelosi, Silva and Rocco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Maia, Lígia de A. Fernandes, Marcos V. S. Santos, Raquel S. Agra, Laís C. Carvalho, Anna Carolinna Rocha, Nazareth de N. Oliveira, Milena V. Santos, Cíntia L. Morales, Marcelo M. Capelozzi, Vera L. Souza, Sergio A. L. Gutfilen, Bianca Schultz, Marcus J. Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Pelosi, Paolo Silva, Pedro L. Rocco, Patricia R. M. Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats |
title | Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats |
title_full | Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats |
title_fullStr | Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats |
title_short | Effects of Protective Mechanical Ventilation With Different PEEP Levels on Alveolar Damage and Inflammation in a Model of Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Study in Obese Versus Non-obese Rats |
title_sort | effects of protective mechanical ventilation with different peep levels on alveolar damage and inflammation in a model of open abdominal surgery: a randomized study in obese versus non-obese rats |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maialigiadea effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT fernandesmarcosvs effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT santosraquels effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT agralaisc effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT carvalhoannacarolinna effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT rochanazarethden effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT oliveiramilenav effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT santoscintial effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT moralesmarcelom effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT capelozziveral effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT souzasergioal effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT gutfilenbianca effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT schultzmarcusj effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT gamadeabreumarcelo effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT pelosipaolo effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT silvapedrol effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats AT roccopatriciarm effectsofprotectivemechanicalventilationwithdifferentpeeplevelsonalveolardamageandinflammationinamodelofopenabdominalsurgeryarandomizedstudyinobeseversusnonobeserats |