Cargando…
Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
BACKGROUND: Hi-C is derived from chromosome conformation capture (3C) and targets chromatin contacts on a genomic scale. This method has also been used frequently in scaffolding nucleotide sequences obtained by de novo genome sequencing and assembly, in which the number of resultant sequences rarely...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz158 |
_version_ | 1783486458389069824 |
---|---|
author | Kadota, Mitsutaka Nishimura, Osamu Miura, Hisashi Tanaka, Kaori Hiratani, Ichiro Kuraku, Shigehiro |
author_facet | Kadota, Mitsutaka Nishimura, Osamu Miura, Hisashi Tanaka, Kaori Hiratani, Ichiro Kuraku, Shigehiro |
author_sort | Kadota, Mitsutaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hi-C is derived from chromosome conformation capture (3C) and targets chromatin contacts on a genomic scale. This method has also been used frequently in scaffolding nucleotide sequences obtained by de novo genome sequencing and assembly, in which the number of resultant sequences rarely converges to the chromosome number. Despite its prevalent use, the sample preparation methods for Hi-C have not been intensively discussed, especially from the standpoint of genome scaffolding. RESULTS: To gain insight into the best practice of Hi-C scaffolding, we performed a multifaceted methodological comparison using vertebrate samples and optimized various factors during sample preparation, sequencing, and computation. As a result, we identified several key factors that helped improve Hi-C scaffolding, including the choice and preparation of tissues, library preparation conditions, the choice of restriction enzyme(s), and the choice of scaffolding program and its usage. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first comparison of multiple sample preparation kits/protocols and computational programs for Hi-C scaffolding by an academic third party. We introduce a customized protocol designated “inexpensive and controllable Hi-C (iconHi-C) protocol,” which incorporates the optimal conditions identified in this study, and demonstrate this technique on chromosome-scale genome sequences of the Chinese softshell turtle Pelodiscus sinensis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6952475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69524752020-01-15 Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? Kadota, Mitsutaka Nishimura, Osamu Miura, Hisashi Tanaka, Kaori Hiratani, Ichiro Kuraku, Shigehiro Gigascience Research BACKGROUND: Hi-C is derived from chromosome conformation capture (3C) and targets chromatin contacts on a genomic scale. This method has also been used frequently in scaffolding nucleotide sequences obtained by de novo genome sequencing and assembly, in which the number of resultant sequences rarely converges to the chromosome number. Despite its prevalent use, the sample preparation methods for Hi-C have not been intensively discussed, especially from the standpoint of genome scaffolding. RESULTS: To gain insight into the best practice of Hi-C scaffolding, we performed a multifaceted methodological comparison using vertebrate samples and optimized various factors during sample preparation, sequencing, and computation. As a result, we identified several key factors that helped improve Hi-C scaffolding, including the choice and preparation of tissues, library preparation conditions, the choice of restriction enzyme(s), and the choice of scaffolding program and its usage. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first comparison of multiple sample preparation kits/protocols and computational programs for Hi-C scaffolding by an academic third party. We introduce a customized protocol designated “inexpensive and controllable Hi-C (iconHi-C) protocol,” which incorporates the optimal conditions identified in this study, and demonstrate this technique on chromosome-scale genome sequences of the Chinese softshell turtle Pelodiscus sinensis. Oxford University Press 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6952475/ /pubmed/31919520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz158 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kadota, Mitsutaka Nishimura, Osamu Miura, Hisashi Tanaka, Kaori Hiratani, Ichiro Kuraku, Shigehiro Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
title | Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
title_full | Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
title_fullStr | Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
title_full_unstemmed | Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
title_short | Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
title_sort | multifaceted hi-c benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadotamitsutaka multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding AT nishimuraosamu multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding AT miurahisashi multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding AT tanakakaori multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding AT hirataniichiro multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding AT kurakushigehiro multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding |