Cargando…

Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?

BACKGROUND: Hi-C is derived from chromosome conformation capture (3C) and targets chromatin contacts on a genomic scale. This method has also been used frequently in scaffolding nucleotide sequences obtained by de novo genome sequencing and assembly, in which the number of resultant sequences rarely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadota, Mitsutaka, Nishimura, Osamu, Miura, Hisashi, Tanaka, Kaori, Hiratani, Ichiro, Kuraku, Shigehiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz158
_version_ 1783486458389069824
author Kadota, Mitsutaka
Nishimura, Osamu
Miura, Hisashi
Tanaka, Kaori
Hiratani, Ichiro
Kuraku, Shigehiro
author_facet Kadota, Mitsutaka
Nishimura, Osamu
Miura, Hisashi
Tanaka, Kaori
Hiratani, Ichiro
Kuraku, Shigehiro
author_sort Kadota, Mitsutaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hi-C is derived from chromosome conformation capture (3C) and targets chromatin contacts on a genomic scale. This method has also been used frequently in scaffolding nucleotide sequences obtained by de novo genome sequencing and assembly, in which the number of resultant sequences rarely converges to the chromosome number. Despite its prevalent use, the sample preparation methods for Hi-C have not been intensively discussed, especially from the standpoint of genome scaffolding. RESULTS: To gain insight into the best practice of Hi-C scaffolding, we performed a multifaceted methodological comparison using vertebrate samples and optimized various factors during sample preparation, sequencing, and computation. As a result, we identified several key factors that helped improve Hi-C scaffolding, including the choice and preparation of tissues, library preparation conditions, the choice of restriction enzyme(s), and the choice of scaffolding program and its usage. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first comparison of multiple sample preparation kits/protocols and computational programs for Hi-C scaffolding by an academic third party. We introduce a customized protocol designated “inexpensive and controllable Hi-C (iconHi-C) protocol,” which incorporates the optimal conditions identified in this study, and demonstrate this technique on chromosome-scale genome sequences of the Chinese softshell turtle Pelodiscus sinensis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6952475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69524752020-01-15 Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? Kadota, Mitsutaka Nishimura, Osamu Miura, Hisashi Tanaka, Kaori Hiratani, Ichiro Kuraku, Shigehiro Gigascience Research BACKGROUND: Hi-C is derived from chromosome conformation capture (3C) and targets chromatin contacts on a genomic scale. This method has also been used frequently in scaffolding nucleotide sequences obtained by de novo genome sequencing and assembly, in which the number of resultant sequences rarely converges to the chromosome number. Despite its prevalent use, the sample preparation methods for Hi-C have not been intensively discussed, especially from the standpoint of genome scaffolding. RESULTS: To gain insight into the best practice of Hi-C scaffolding, we performed a multifaceted methodological comparison using vertebrate samples and optimized various factors during sample preparation, sequencing, and computation. As a result, we identified several key factors that helped improve Hi-C scaffolding, including the choice and preparation of tissues, library preparation conditions, the choice of restriction enzyme(s), and the choice of scaffolding program and its usage. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first comparison of multiple sample preparation kits/protocols and computational programs for Hi-C scaffolding by an academic third party. We introduce a customized protocol designated “inexpensive and controllable Hi-C (iconHi-C) protocol,” which incorporates the optimal conditions identified in this study, and demonstrate this technique on chromosome-scale genome sequences of the Chinese softshell turtle Pelodiscus sinensis. Oxford University Press 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6952475/ /pubmed/31919520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz158 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kadota, Mitsutaka
Nishimura, Osamu
Miura, Hisashi
Tanaka, Kaori
Hiratani, Ichiro
Kuraku, Shigehiro
Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
title Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
title_full Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
title_fullStr Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
title_full_unstemmed Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
title_short Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
title_sort multifaceted hi-c benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz158
work_keys_str_mv AT kadotamitsutaka multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding
AT nishimuraosamu multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding
AT miurahisashi multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding
AT tanakakaori multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding
AT hirataniichiro multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding
AT kurakushigehiro multifacetedhicbenchmarkingwhatmakesadifferenceinchromosomescalegenomescaffolding