Cargando…

A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology

BACKGROUND: Provision of relevant pre-learning materials has been shown to increase student engagement and improve outcomes in medical education. This non-randomised study attempts to quantify the educational gains, and relative efficacy of video and written pre-learning materials, in ophthalmology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hogg, H. D. Jeffry, Pereira, Michael, Purdy, Julian, Frearson, Richard J. R., Lau, Gordon B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1923-1
_version_ 1783486609088315392
author Hogg, H. D. Jeffry
Pereira, Michael
Purdy, Julian
Frearson, Richard J. R.
Lau, Gordon B.
author_facet Hogg, H. D. Jeffry
Pereira, Michael
Purdy, Julian
Frearson, Richard J. R.
Lau, Gordon B.
author_sort Hogg, H. D. Jeffry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Provision of relevant pre-learning materials has been shown to increase student engagement and improve outcomes in medical education. This non-randomised study attempts to quantify the educational gains, and relative efficacy of video and written pre-learning materials, in ophthalmology undergraduate teaching. METHODS: Ninety-eight final year medical students were contacted prior to their three-day ophthalmology placements at a British tertiary ophthalmology unit. All participants were sent welcome packs prior to arrival requesting they undertake 90 min of work focusing on a list of specified ophthalmic conditions. One cohort (N = 33) were sent written materials, another (N = 32) was provided with video materials and a third cohort (N = 33) were not sent any materials. On arrival participants completed a simple knowledge test, a questionnaire estimating the time they spent preparing for the placement and a self-reported knowledge score. The teaching on placement was the same for all cohorts. At the conclusion of each placement participants completed a challenging knowledge test, a clinical skills test and repeated self-reported knowledge scores. RESULTS: Eighty seven percent of students receiving specified materials claimed to complete pre-placement work compared to 70% of those receiving learning outcomes alone (p = 0.05). Students receiving learning materials scored higher in the post-placement tests of knowledge (p < 0.001), 74.8% (72.4–77.2%) vs 63.6% (95%CI 59.3–67.9%) and skills (p = 0.04), 86.9% (83.9–89.9%) vs 81.3% (77.2–85.4%). Students using video resources outperformed students using written materials in their visual acuity assessment test (p = 0.03), 90.4% (86.6–94.2%) vs 83.6% (80.1–87.1%) whilst those receiving written rather than video material performed better in the end of placement knowledge test (p = 0.03), 77.7% (74.3–81.1%) vs 72.0% (68.9–75.1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that providing pre-placement learning materials improves undergraduates’ commitment and achievement. Written materials better facilitate knowledge acquisition while video materials preferentially promote skill acquisition. This is a novel demonstration within ophthalmology and can help address the imbalance between the expectations placed on undergraduates and the resources committed to ensuring they are met.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69532812020-01-14 A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology Hogg, H. D. Jeffry Pereira, Michael Purdy, Julian Frearson, Richard J. R. Lau, Gordon B. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Provision of relevant pre-learning materials has been shown to increase student engagement and improve outcomes in medical education. This non-randomised study attempts to quantify the educational gains, and relative efficacy of video and written pre-learning materials, in ophthalmology undergraduate teaching. METHODS: Ninety-eight final year medical students were contacted prior to their three-day ophthalmology placements at a British tertiary ophthalmology unit. All participants were sent welcome packs prior to arrival requesting they undertake 90 min of work focusing on a list of specified ophthalmic conditions. One cohort (N = 33) were sent written materials, another (N = 32) was provided with video materials and a third cohort (N = 33) were not sent any materials. On arrival participants completed a simple knowledge test, a questionnaire estimating the time they spent preparing for the placement and a self-reported knowledge score. The teaching on placement was the same for all cohorts. At the conclusion of each placement participants completed a challenging knowledge test, a clinical skills test and repeated self-reported knowledge scores. RESULTS: Eighty seven percent of students receiving specified materials claimed to complete pre-placement work compared to 70% of those receiving learning outcomes alone (p = 0.05). Students receiving learning materials scored higher in the post-placement tests of knowledge (p < 0.001), 74.8% (72.4–77.2%) vs 63.6% (95%CI 59.3–67.9%) and skills (p = 0.04), 86.9% (83.9–89.9%) vs 81.3% (77.2–85.4%). Students using video resources outperformed students using written materials in their visual acuity assessment test (p = 0.03), 90.4% (86.6–94.2%) vs 83.6% (80.1–87.1%) whilst those receiving written rather than video material performed better in the end of placement knowledge test (p = 0.03), 77.7% (74.3–81.1%) vs 72.0% (68.9–75.1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that providing pre-placement learning materials improves undergraduates’ commitment and achievement. Written materials better facilitate knowledge acquisition while video materials preferentially promote skill acquisition. This is a novel demonstration within ophthalmology and can help address the imbalance between the expectations placed on undergraduates and the resources committed to ensuring they are met. BioMed Central 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6953281/ /pubmed/31918692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1923-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hogg, H. D. Jeffry
Pereira, Michael
Purdy, Julian
Frearson, Richard J. R.
Lau, Gordon B.
A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
title A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
title_full A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
title_fullStr A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
title_full_unstemmed A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
title_short A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
title_sort non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1923-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hogghdjeffry anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT pereiramichael anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT purdyjulian anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT frearsonrichardjr anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT laugordonb anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT hogghdjeffry nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT pereiramichael nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT purdyjulian nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT frearsonrichardjr nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology
AT laugordonb nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology