Cargando…
A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology
BACKGROUND: Provision of relevant pre-learning materials has been shown to increase student engagement and improve outcomes in medical education. This non-randomised study attempts to quantify the educational gains, and relative efficacy of video and written pre-learning materials, in ophthalmology...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1923-1 |
_version_ | 1783486609088315392 |
---|---|
author | Hogg, H. D. Jeffry Pereira, Michael Purdy, Julian Frearson, Richard J. R. Lau, Gordon B. |
author_facet | Hogg, H. D. Jeffry Pereira, Michael Purdy, Julian Frearson, Richard J. R. Lau, Gordon B. |
author_sort | Hogg, H. D. Jeffry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Provision of relevant pre-learning materials has been shown to increase student engagement and improve outcomes in medical education. This non-randomised study attempts to quantify the educational gains, and relative efficacy of video and written pre-learning materials, in ophthalmology undergraduate teaching. METHODS: Ninety-eight final year medical students were contacted prior to their three-day ophthalmology placements at a British tertiary ophthalmology unit. All participants were sent welcome packs prior to arrival requesting they undertake 90 min of work focusing on a list of specified ophthalmic conditions. One cohort (N = 33) were sent written materials, another (N = 32) was provided with video materials and a third cohort (N = 33) were not sent any materials. On arrival participants completed a simple knowledge test, a questionnaire estimating the time they spent preparing for the placement and a self-reported knowledge score. The teaching on placement was the same for all cohorts. At the conclusion of each placement participants completed a challenging knowledge test, a clinical skills test and repeated self-reported knowledge scores. RESULTS: Eighty seven percent of students receiving specified materials claimed to complete pre-placement work compared to 70% of those receiving learning outcomes alone (p = 0.05). Students receiving learning materials scored higher in the post-placement tests of knowledge (p < 0.001), 74.8% (72.4–77.2%) vs 63.6% (95%CI 59.3–67.9%) and skills (p = 0.04), 86.9% (83.9–89.9%) vs 81.3% (77.2–85.4%). Students using video resources outperformed students using written materials in their visual acuity assessment test (p = 0.03), 90.4% (86.6–94.2%) vs 83.6% (80.1–87.1%) whilst those receiving written rather than video material performed better in the end of placement knowledge test (p = 0.03), 77.7% (74.3–81.1%) vs 72.0% (68.9–75.1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that providing pre-placement learning materials improves undergraduates’ commitment and achievement. Written materials better facilitate knowledge acquisition while video materials preferentially promote skill acquisition. This is a novel demonstration within ophthalmology and can help address the imbalance between the expectations placed on undergraduates and the resources committed to ensuring they are met. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6953281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69532812020-01-14 A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology Hogg, H. D. Jeffry Pereira, Michael Purdy, Julian Frearson, Richard J. R. Lau, Gordon B. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Provision of relevant pre-learning materials has been shown to increase student engagement and improve outcomes in medical education. This non-randomised study attempts to quantify the educational gains, and relative efficacy of video and written pre-learning materials, in ophthalmology undergraduate teaching. METHODS: Ninety-eight final year medical students were contacted prior to their three-day ophthalmology placements at a British tertiary ophthalmology unit. All participants were sent welcome packs prior to arrival requesting they undertake 90 min of work focusing on a list of specified ophthalmic conditions. One cohort (N = 33) were sent written materials, another (N = 32) was provided with video materials and a third cohort (N = 33) were not sent any materials. On arrival participants completed a simple knowledge test, a questionnaire estimating the time they spent preparing for the placement and a self-reported knowledge score. The teaching on placement was the same for all cohorts. At the conclusion of each placement participants completed a challenging knowledge test, a clinical skills test and repeated self-reported knowledge scores. RESULTS: Eighty seven percent of students receiving specified materials claimed to complete pre-placement work compared to 70% of those receiving learning outcomes alone (p = 0.05). Students receiving learning materials scored higher in the post-placement tests of knowledge (p < 0.001), 74.8% (72.4–77.2%) vs 63.6% (95%CI 59.3–67.9%) and skills (p = 0.04), 86.9% (83.9–89.9%) vs 81.3% (77.2–85.4%). Students using video resources outperformed students using written materials in their visual acuity assessment test (p = 0.03), 90.4% (86.6–94.2%) vs 83.6% (80.1–87.1%) whilst those receiving written rather than video material performed better in the end of placement knowledge test (p = 0.03), 77.7% (74.3–81.1%) vs 72.0% (68.9–75.1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that providing pre-placement learning materials improves undergraduates’ commitment and achievement. Written materials better facilitate knowledge acquisition while video materials preferentially promote skill acquisition. This is a novel demonstration within ophthalmology and can help address the imbalance between the expectations placed on undergraduates and the resources committed to ensuring they are met. BioMed Central 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6953281/ /pubmed/31918692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1923-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hogg, H. D. Jeffry Pereira, Michael Purdy, Julian Frearson, Richard J. R. Lau, Gordon B. A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
title | A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
title_full | A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
title_fullStr | A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
title_full_unstemmed | A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
title_short | A non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
title_sort | non-randomised trial of video and written educational adjuncts in undergraduate ophthalmology |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1923-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hogghdjeffry anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT pereiramichael anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT purdyjulian anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT frearsonrichardjr anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT laugordonb anonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT hogghdjeffry nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT pereiramichael nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT purdyjulian nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT frearsonrichardjr nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology AT laugordonb nonrandomisedtrialofvideoandwritteneducationaladjunctsinundergraduateophthalmology |