Cargando…
Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
To assess biofilm formation ability and identify differences in the prevalence of genes involved in biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different food samples, the ability of biofilm formation among 97 S. aureus strains was evaluated using a colorimetric microtiter pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.946 |
_version_ | 1783487303320076288 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Qi Xie, Sangma Lou, Xiuqin Cheng, Shi Liu, Xiaodong Zheng, Wei Zheng, Zhibei Wang, Haoqiu |
author_facet | Chen, Qi Xie, Sangma Lou, Xiuqin Cheng, Shi Liu, Xiaodong Zheng, Wei Zheng, Zhibei Wang, Haoqiu |
author_sort | Chen, Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess biofilm formation ability and identify differences in the prevalence of genes involved in biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different food samples, the ability of biofilm formation among 97 S. aureus strains was evaluated using a colorimetric microtiter plate assay. Thirteen genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, and the intracellular adhesion genes were detected by PCR using specific primers. Approximately 72% of the isolates produced biofilms. Among these isolates, 54.64% were weak biofilm producers, while 14.43% and 3.09% produced moderate and strong biofilms, respectively. The icaADBC, clfA/B, cidA, and fib genes were detected in all the S. aureus strains, whereas the bap gene was not present in any of the strains. The occurrence of other adhesin genes varied greatly between biofilm‐producing and nonbiofilm‐producing strains. However, a significant difference was observed between these two groups with respect to the fnbpB, cna, ebps, and sdrC genes. No obvious evidence was found to support the link between PFGE strain typing and the capacity for biofilm formation. Considerable variation in biofilm formation ability was observed among S. aureus strains isolated from food samples. The prevalence of adhesin‐encoding genes also varied greatly within strains. This study highlights the importance of biofilm formation and the adhesins of S. aureus strains in food samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6957440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69574402020-01-17 Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources Chen, Qi Xie, Sangma Lou, Xiuqin Cheng, Shi Liu, Xiaodong Zheng, Wei Zheng, Zhibei Wang, Haoqiu Microbiologyopen Original Articles To assess biofilm formation ability and identify differences in the prevalence of genes involved in biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different food samples, the ability of biofilm formation among 97 S. aureus strains was evaluated using a colorimetric microtiter plate assay. Thirteen genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, and the intracellular adhesion genes were detected by PCR using specific primers. Approximately 72% of the isolates produced biofilms. Among these isolates, 54.64% were weak biofilm producers, while 14.43% and 3.09% produced moderate and strong biofilms, respectively. The icaADBC, clfA/B, cidA, and fib genes were detected in all the S. aureus strains, whereas the bap gene was not present in any of the strains. The occurrence of other adhesin genes varied greatly between biofilm‐producing and nonbiofilm‐producing strains. However, a significant difference was observed between these two groups with respect to the fnbpB, cna, ebps, and sdrC genes. No obvious evidence was found to support the link between PFGE strain typing and the capacity for biofilm formation. Considerable variation in biofilm formation ability was observed among S. aureus strains isolated from food samples. The prevalence of adhesin‐encoding genes also varied greatly within strains. This study highlights the importance of biofilm formation and the adhesins of S. aureus strains in food samples. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6957440/ /pubmed/31769202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.946 Text en © 2019 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Chen, Qi Xie, Sangma Lou, Xiuqin Cheng, Shi Liu, Xiaodong Zheng, Wei Zheng, Zhibei Wang, Haoqiu Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
title | Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
title_full | Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
title_fullStr | Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
title_full_unstemmed | Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
title_short | Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
title_sort | biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenqi biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT xiesangma biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT louxiuqin biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT chengshi biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT liuxiaodong biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT zhengwei biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT zhengzhibei biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources AT wanghaoqiu biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources |