Cargando…

Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources

To assess biofilm formation ability and identify differences in the prevalence of genes involved in biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different food samples, the ability of biofilm formation among 97 S. aureus strains was evaluated using a colorimetric microtiter pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Qi, Xie, Sangma, Lou, Xiuqin, Cheng, Shi, Liu, Xiaodong, Zheng, Wei, Zheng, Zhibei, Wang, Haoqiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.946
_version_ 1783487303320076288
author Chen, Qi
Xie, Sangma
Lou, Xiuqin
Cheng, Shi
Liu, Xiaodong
Zheng, Wei
Zheng, Zhibei
Wang, Haoqiu
author_facet Chen, Qi
Xie, Sangma
Lou, Xiuqin
Cheng, Shi
Liu, Xiaodong
Zheng, Wei
Zheng, Zhibei
Wang, Haoqiu
author_sort Chen, Qi
collection PubMed
description To assess biofilm formation ability and identify differences in the prevalence of genes involved in biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different food samples, the ability of biofilm formation among 97 S. aureus strains was evaluated using a colorimetric microtiter plate assay. Thirteen genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, and the intracellular adhesion genes were detected by PCR using specific primers. Approximately 72% of the isolates produced biofilms. Among these isolates, 54.64% were weak biofilm producers, while 14.43% and 3.09% produced moderate and strong biofilms, respectively. The icaADBC, clfA/B, cidA, and fib genes were detected in all the S. aureus strains, whereas the bap gene was not present in any of the strains. The occurrence of other adhesin genes varied greatly between biofilm‐producing and nonbiofilm‐producing strains. However, a significant difference was observed between these two groups with respect to the fnbpB, cna, ebps, and sdrC genes. No obvious evidence was found to support the link between PFGE strain typing and the capacity for biofilm formation. Considerable variation in biofilm formation ability was observed among S. aureus strains isolated from food samples. The prevalence of adhesin‐encoding genes also varied greatly within strains. This study highlights the importance of biofilm formation and the adhesins of S. aureus strains in food samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6957440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69574402020-01-17 Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources Chen, Qi Xie, Sangma Lou, Xiuqin Cheng, Shi Liu, Xiaodong Zheng, Wei Zheng, Zhibei Wang, Haoqiu Microbiologyopen Original Articles To assess biofilm formation ability and identify differences in the prevalence of genes involved in biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different food samples, the ability of biofilm formation among 97 S. aureus strains was evaluated using a colorimetric microtiter plate assay. Thirteen genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, and the intracellular adhesion genes were detected by PCR using specific primers. Approximately 72% of the isolates produced biofilms. Among these isolates, 54.64% were weak biofilm producers, while 14.43% and 3.09% produced moderate and strong biofilms, respectively. The icaADBC, clfA/B, cidA, and fib genes were detected in all the S. aureus strains, whereas the bap gene was not present in any of the strains. The occurrence of other adhesin genes varied greatly between biofilm‐producing and nonbiofilm‐producing strains. However, a significant difference was observed between these two groups with respect to the fnbpB, cna, ebps, and sdrC genes. No obvious evidence was found to support the link between PFGE strain typing and the capacity for biofilm formation. Considerable variation in biofilm formation ability was observed among S. aureus strains isolated from food samples. The prevalence of adhesin‐encoding genes also varied greatly within strains. This study highlights the importance of biofilm formation and the adhesins of S. aureus strains in food samples. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6957440/ /pubmed/31769202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.946 Text en © 2019 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chen, Qi
Xie, Sangma
Lou, Xiuqin
Cheng, Shi
Liu, Xiaodong
Zheng, Wei
Zheng, Zhibei
Wang, Haoqiu
Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
title Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
title_full Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
title_fullStr Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
title_full_unstemmed Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
title_short Biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
title_sort biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion genes among staphylococcus aureus isolates from different food sources
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.946
work_keys_str_mv AT chenqi biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT xiesangma biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT louxiuqin biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT chengshi biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT liuxiaodong biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT zhengwei biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT zhengzhibei biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources
AT wanghaoqiu biofilmformationandprevalenceofadhesiongenesamongstaphylococcusaureusisolatesfromdifferentfoodsources