Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: Automated approaches to improve the efficiency of systematic reviews are greatly needed. When testing any of these approaches, the criterion standard of comparison (gold standard) is usually human reviewers. Yet, human reviewers make errors in inclusion and exclusion of references. OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhen, Nayfeh, Tarek, Tetzlaff, Jennifer, O’Blenis, Peter, Murad, Mohammad Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227742

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227742

Ejemplares similares