Cargando…
Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Automated approaches to improve the efficiency of systematic reviews are greatly needed. When testing any of these approaches, the criterion standard of comparison (gold standard) is usually human reviewers. Yet, human reviewers make errors in inclusion and exclusion of references. OBJEC...
Autores principales: | Wang, Zhen, Nayfeh, Tarek, Tetzlaff, Jennifer, O’Blenis, Peter, Murad, Mohammad Hassan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227742 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: A systematic review
por: Schachter, Howard M, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Vasopressin in vasoplegic shock: A systematic review
por: Webb, Andrew J, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Error in Abstract and Visual Abstract
Publicado: (2022) -
Error in Abstract
Publicado: (2020) -
Error in Abstract
Publicado: (2020)