Cargando…
Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation
Purpose: Tumor markers that are related to hypoxia, proliferation, DNA damage repair and stem cell-ness, have a prognostic value in advanced stage HNSCC patients when assessed individually. Here we aimed to evaluate and validate this in a multifactorial context and assess interrelation and the combi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01470 |
_version_ | 1783488714425499648 |
---|---|
author | van der Heijden, Martijn Essers, Paul B. M. de Jong, Monique C. de Roest, Reinout H. Sanduleanu, Sebastian Verhagen, Caroline V. M. Hamming-Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe Bartelink, Harry Leemans, C. René Verheij, Marcel Brakenhoff, Ruud H. van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. Vens, Conchita |
author_facet | van der Heijden, Martijn Essers, Paul B. M. de Jong, Monique C. de Roest, Reinout H. Sanduleanu, Sebastian Verhagen, Caroline V. M. Hamming-Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe Bartelink, Harry Leemans, C. René Verheij, Marcel Brakenhoff, Ruud H. van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. Vens, Conchita |
author_sort | van der Heijden, Martijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Tumor markers that are related to hypoxia, proliferation, DNA damage repair and stem cell-ness, have a prognostic value in advanced stage HNSCC patients when assessed individually. Here we aimed to evaluate and validate this in a multifactorial context and assess interrelation and the combined role of these biological factors in determining chemo-radiotherapy response in HPV-negative advanced HNSCC. Methods: RNA sequencing data of pre-treatment biopsy material from 197 HPV-negative advanced stage HNSCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy was analyzed. Biological parameter scores were assigned to patient samples using previously generated and described gene expression signatures. Locoregional control rates were used to assess the role of these biological parameters in radiation response and compared to distant metastasis data. Biological factors were ranked according to their clinical impact using bootstrapping methods and multivariate Cox regression analyses that included clinical variables. Multivariate Cox regression analyses comprising all biological variables were used to define their relative role among all factors when combined. Results: Only few biomarker scores correlate with each other, underscoring their independence. The different biological factors do not correlate or cluster, except for the two stem cell markers CD44 and SLC3A2 (r = 0.4, p < 0.001) and acute hypoxia prediction scores which correlated with T-cell infiltration score, CD8(+) T cell abundance and proliferation scores (r = 0.52, 0.56, and 0.6, respectively with p < 0.001). Locoregional control association analyses revealed that chronic (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.9) and acute hypoxia (HR = 1.9), followed by stem cell-ness (CD44/SLC3A2; HR = 2.2/2.3), were the strongest and most robust determinants of radiation response. Furthermore, multivariable analysis, considering other biological and clinical factors, reveal a significant role for EGFR expression (HR = 2.9, p < 0.05) and T-cell infiltration (CD8(+)T-cells: HR = 2.2, p < 0.05; CD8(+)T-cells/Treg: HR = 2.6, p < 0.01) signatures in locoregional control of chemoradiotherapy-treated HNSCC. Conclusion: Tumor acute and chronic hypoxia, stem cell-ness, and CD8(+) T-cell parameters are relevant and largely independent biological factors that together contribute to locoregional control. The combined analyses illustrate the additive value of multifactorial analyses and support a role for EGFR expression analysis and immune cell markers in addition to previously validated biomarkers. This external validation underscores the relevance of biological factors in determining chemoradiotherapy outcome in HNSCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6966332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69663322020-01-29 Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation van der Heijden, Martijn Essers, Paul B. M. de Jong, Monique C. de Roest, Reinout H. Sanduleanu, Sebastian Verhagen, Caroline V. M. Hamming-Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe Bartelink, Harry Leemans, C. René Verheij, Marcel Brakenhoff, Ruud H. van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. Vens, Conchita Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: Tumor markers that are related to hypoxia, proliferation, DNA damage repair and stem cell-ness, have a prognostic value in advanced stage HNSCC patients when assessed individually. Here we aimed to evaluate and validate this in a multifactorial context and assess interrelation and the combined role of these biological factors in determining chemo-radiotherapy response in HPV-negative advanced HNSCC. Methods: RNA sequencing data of pre-treatment biopsy material from 197 HPV-negative advanced stage HNSCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy was analyzed. Biological parameter scores were assigned to patient samples using previously generated and described gene expression signatures. Locoregional control rates were used to assess the role of these biological parameters in radiation response and compared to distant metastasis data. Biological factors were ranked according to their clinical impact using bootstrapping methods and multivariate Cox regression analyses that included clinical variables. Multivariate Cox regression analyses comprising all biological variables were used to define their relative role among all factors when combined. Results: Only few biomarker scores correlate with each other, underscoring their independence. The different biological factors do not correlate or cluster, except for the two stem cell markers CD44 and SLC3A2 (r = 0.4, p < 0.001) and acute hypoxia prediction scores which correlated with T-cell infiltration score, CD8(+) T cell abundance and proliferation scores (r = 0.52, 0.56, and 0.6, respectively with p < 0.001). Locoregional control association analyses revealed that chronic (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.9) and acute hypoxia (HR = 1.9), followed by stem cell-ness (CD44/SLC3A2; HR = 2.2/2.3), were the strongest and most robust determinants of radiation response. Furthermore, multivariable analysis, considering other biological and clinical factors, reveal a significant role for EGFR expression (HR = 2.9, p < 0.05) and T-cell infiltration (CD8(+)T-cells: HR = 2.2, p < 0.05; CD8(+)T-cells/Treg: HR = 2.6, p < 0.01) signatures in locoregional control of chemoradiotherapy-treated HNSCC. Conclusion: Tumor acute and chronic hypoxia, stem cell-ness, and CD8(+) T-cell parameters are relevant and largely independent biological factors that together contribute to locoregional control. The combined analyses illustrate the additive value of multifactorial analyses and support a role for EGFR expression analysis and immune cell markers in addition to previously validated biomarkers. This external validation underscores the relevance of biological factors in determining chemoradiotherapy outcome in HNSCC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6966332/ /pubmed/31998639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01470 Text en Copyright © 2020 van der Heijden, Essers, de Jong, de Roest, Sanduleanu, Verhagen, Hamming-Vrieze, Hoebers, Lambin, Bartelink, Leemans, Verheij, Brakenhoff, van den Brekel and Vens. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology van der Heijden, Martijn Essers, Paul B. M. de Jong, Monique C. de Roest, Reinout H. Sanduleanu, Sebastian Verhagen, Caroline V. M. Hamming-Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe Bartelink, Harry Leemans, C. René Verheij, Marcel Brakenhoff, Ruud H. van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. Vens, Conchita Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation |
title | Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation |
title_full | Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation |
title_fullStr | Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation |
title_short | Biological Determinants of Chemo-Radiotherapy Response in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicentric External Validation |
title_sort | biological determinants of chemo-radiotherapy response in hpv-negative head and neck cancer: a multicentric external validation |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6966332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderheijdenmartijn biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT esserspaulbm biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT dejongmoniquec biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT deroestreinouth biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT sanduleanusebastian biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT verhagencarolinevm biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT hammingvriezeolga biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT hoebersfrank biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT lambinphilippe biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT bartelinkharry biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT leemanscrene biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT verheijmarcel biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT brakenhoffruudh biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT vandenbrekelmichielwm biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation AT vensconchita biologicaldeterminantsofchemoradiotherapyresponseinhpvnegativeheadandneckcanceramulticentricexternalvalidation |