Cargando…

“Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders

OBJECTIVES: Practitioners and organizational leaders are calling for practical ways to explain and monitor factors that affect workplace health and productivity. This article builds on the well‐established Job Demands‐Resources (JD‐R) model and proposes an empirically tested ratio that aggregates in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenny, Gregor J., Bauer, Georg F., Füllemann, Désirée, Broetje, Sylvia, Brauchli, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12101
_version_ 1783489511975550976
author Jenny, Gregor J.
Bauer, Georg F.
Füllemann, Désirée
Broetje, Sylvia
Brauchli, Rebecca
author_facet Jenny, Gregor J.
Bauer, Georg F.
Füllemann, Désirée
Broetje, Sylvia
Brauchli, Rebecca
author_sort Jenny, Gregor J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Practitioners and organizational leaders are calling for practical ways to explain and monitor factors that affect workplace health and productivity. This article builds on the well‐established Job Demands‐Resources (JD‐R) model and proposes an empirically tested ratio that aggregates indicators of job resources and demands. In this study, we calculate a ratio of generalizable job resources and demands derived from the JD‐R model and then translate the ratio into the language of company stakeholders. METHODS: We calculated a ratio based on measures applied in a large stress management intervention study (n = 2983) and report the findings from cross‐sectional analysis with health and productivity outcomes from same‐source and separate‐source data. RESULTS: Findings showed a strong and unambiguous increase in health and productivity measures with each step of increase in the ratio. Loss in explained variance due to aggregation of two factors into a single ratio is small for measures which are known to be predicted by both factors simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: A translation and visualization of the ratio that is accessible to practitioners and organizational leaders is presented and its use in companies discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6970389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69703892020-01-27 “Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders Jenny, Gregor J. Bauer, Georg F. Füllemann, Désirée Broetje, Sylvia Brauchli, Rebecca J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Practitioners and organizational leaders are calling for practical ways to explain and monitor factors that affect workplace health and productivity. This article builds on the well‐established Job Demands‐Resources (JD‐R) model and proposes an empirically tested ratio that aggregates indicators of job resources and demands. In this study, we calculate a ratio of generalizable job resources and demands derived from the JD‐R model and then translate the ratio into the language of company stakeholders. METHODS: We calculated a ratio based on measures applied in a large stress management intervention study (n = 2983) and report the findings from cross‐sectional analysis with health and productivity outcomes from same‐source and separate‐source data. RESULTS: Findings showed a strong and unambiguous increase in health and productivity measures with each step of increase in the ratio. Loss in explained variance due to aggregation of two factors into a single ratio is small for measures which are known to be predicted by both factors simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: A translation and visualization of the ratio that is accessible to practitioners and organizational leaders is presented and its use in companies discussed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6970389/ /pubmed/31773879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12101 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jenny, Gregor J.
Bauer, Georg F.
Füllemann, Désirée
Broetje, Sylvia
Brauchli, Rebecca
“Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders
title “Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders
title_full “Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders
title_fullStr “Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed “Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders
title_short “Resources‐Demands Ratio”: Translating the JD‐R‐Model for company stakeholders
title_sort “resources‐demands ratio”: translating the jd‐r‐model for company stakeholders
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12101
work_keys_str_mv AT jennygregorj resourcesdemandsratiotranslatingthejdrmodelforcompanystakeholders
AT bauergeorgf resourcesdemandsratiotranslatingthejdrmodelforcompanystakeholders
AT fullemanndesiree resourcesdemandsratiotranslatingthejdrmodelforcompanystakeholders
AT broetjesylvia resourcesdemandsratiotranslatingthejdrmodelforcompanystakeholders
AT brauchlirebecca resourcesdemandsratiotranslatingthejdrmodelforcompanystakeholders