Cargando…
Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
PURPOSE: [(18)F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, “off-target” binding interferes with the quantification of [(18)F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0 |
_version_ | 1783490109359783936 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Ruben Schöll, Michael Leuzy, Antoine Jögi, Jonas Ohlsson, Tomas Strandberg, Olof Hansson, Oskar |
author_facet | Smith, Ruben Schöll, Michael Leuzy, Antoine Jögi, Jonas Ohlsson, Tomas Strandberg, Olof Hansson, Oskar |
author_sort | Smith, Ruben |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: [(18)F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, “off-target” binding interferes with the quantification of [(18)F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we compare [(18)F]flortaucipir with the novel tau tracer [(18)F]RO948 head-to-head in vivo. METHODS: We included 18 participants with AD, three with amyloid-β-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and four healthy controls. All underwent [(18)F]flortaucipir (80–100 min) and [(18)F]RO948 (70–90) PET scans within approximately 1 month. Four study participants underwent 0–100-min dynamic scanning. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were created using an inferior cerebellar reference region. RESULTS: Neocortical tracer retention was highly comparable using both SUVR and distribution volume ratio-1 values obtained from dynamic scans. However, [(18)F]RO948 retention was significantly higher in the entorhinal cortex and lower in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and choroid plexus compared with [(18)F]flortaucipir. Increased off-target binding was observed with age for both tracers. Several cases exhibited strong [(18)F]RO948 retention in the skull/meninges. This extra-cerebral signal, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy and remained relatively unchanged when re-examining a subsample after 1 year. Kinetic modeling showed an increase in [(18)F]flortaucipir SUVR over the scanning interval, compared with a plateau for [(18)F]RO948. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]RO948 and [(18)F]flortaucipir bound comparably in neocortical regions, but [(18)F]RO948 showed higher retention in the medial temporal lobe and lower intracerebral “off-target” binding. Time-dependent bias of SUVR estimates may prove less of a factor with [(18)F]RO948, compared with previous tau ligands. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6974501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69745012020-02-03 Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 Smith, Ruben Schöll, Michael Leuzy, Antoine Jögi, Jonas Ohlsson, Tomas Strandberg, Olof Hansson, Oskar Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: [(18)F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, “off-target” binding interferes with the quantification of [(18)F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we compare [(18)F]flortaucipir with the novel tau tracer [(18)F]RO948 head-to-head in vivo. METHODS: We included 18 participants with AD, three with amyloid-β-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and four healthy controls. All underwent [(18)F]flortaucipir (80–100 min) and [(18)F]RO948 (70–90) PET scans within approximately 1 month. Four study participants underwent 0–100-min dynamic scanning. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were created using an inferior cerebellar reference region. RESULTS: Neocortical tracer retention was highly comparable using both SUVR and distribution volume ratio-1 values obtained from dynamic scans. However, [(18)F]RO948 retention was significantly higher in the entorhinal cortex and lower in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and choroid plexus compared with [(18)F]flortaucipir. Increased off-target binding was observed with age for both tracers. Several cases exhibited strong [(18)F]RO948 retention in the skull/meninges. This extra-cerebral signal, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy and remained relatively unchanged when re-examining a subsample after 1 year. Kinetic modeling showed an increase in [(18)F]flortaucipir SUVR over the scanning interval, compared with a plateau for [(18)F]RO948. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]RO948 and [(18)F]flortaucipir bound comparably in neocortical regions, but [(18)F]RO948 showed higher retention in the medial temporal lobe and lower intracerebral “off-target” binding. Time-dependent bias of SUVR estimates may prove less of a factor with [(18)F]RO948, compared with previous tau ligands. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6974501/ /pubmed/31612245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Smith, Ruben Schöll, Michael Leuzy, Antoine Jögi, Jonas Ohlsson, Tomas Strandberg, Olof Hansson, Oskar Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 |
title | Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 |
title_full | Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 |
title_fullStr | Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 |
title_full_unstemmed | Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 |
title_short | Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 |
title_sort | head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)f]flortaucipir and [(18)f]ro948 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithruben headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 AT schollmichael headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 AT leuzyantoine headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 AT jogijonas headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 AT ohlssontomas headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 AT strandbergolof headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 AT hanssonoskar headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948 |