Cargando…

Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948

PURPOSE: [(18)F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, “off-target” binding interferes with the quantification of [(18)F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Ruben, Schöll, Michael, Leuzy, Antoine, Jögi, Jonas, Ohlsson, Tomas, Strandberg, Olof, Hansson, Oskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0
_version_ 1783490109359783936
author Smith, Ruben
Schöll, Michael
Leuzy, Antoine
Jögi, Jonas
Ohlsson, Tomas
Strandberg, Olof
Hansson, Oskar
author_facet Smith, Ruben
Schöll, Michael
Leuzy, Antoine
Jögi, Jonas
Ohlsson, Tomas
Strandberg, Olof
Hansson, Oskar
author_sort Smith, Ruben
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: [(18)F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, “off-target” binding interferes with the quantification of [(18)F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we compare [(18)F]flortaucipir with the novel tau tracer [(18)F]RO948 head-to-head in vivo. METHODS: We included 18 participants with AD, three with amyloid-β-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and four healthy controls. All underwent [(18)F]flortaucipir (80–100 min) and [(18)F]RO948 (70–90) PET scans within approximately 1 month. Four study participants underwent 0–100-min dynamic scanning. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were created using an inferior cerebellar reference region. RESULTS: Neocortical tracer retention was highly comparable using both SUVR and distribution volume ratio-1 values obtained from dynamic scans. However, [(18)F]RO948 retention was significantly higher in the entorhinal cortex and lower in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and choroid plexus compared with [(18)F]flortaucipir. Increased off-target binding was observed with age for both tracers. Several cases exhibited strong [(18)F]RO948 retention in the skull/meninges. This extra-cerebral signal, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy and remained relatively unchanged when re-examining a subsample after 1 year. Kinetic modeling showed an increase in [(18)F]flortaucipir SUVR over the scanning interval, compared with a plateau for [(18)F]RO948. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]RO948 and [(18)F]flortaucipir bound comparably in neocortical regions, but [(18)F]RO948 showed higher retention in the medial temporal lobe and lower intracerebral “off-target” binding. Time-dependent bias of SUVR estimates may prove less of a factor with [(18)F]RO948, compared with previous tau ligands. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6974501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69745012020-02-03 Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948 Smith, Ruben Schöll, Michael Leuzy, Antoine Jögi, Jonas Ohlsson, Tomas Strandberg, Olof Hansson, Oskar Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: [(18)F]flortaucipir binds to paired helical filament tau and accurately identifies tau in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, “off-target” binding interferes with the quantification of [(18)F]flortaucipir in several brain regions. Recently, other tau PET tracers have been developed. Here, we compare [(18)F]flortaucipir with the novel tau tracer [(18)F]RO948 head-to-head in vivo. METHODS: We included 18 participants with AD, three with amyloid-β-positive amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and four healthy controls. All underwent [(18)F]flortaucipir (80–100 min) and [(18)F]RO948 (70–90) PET scans within approximately 1 month. Four study participants underwent 0–100-min dynamic scanning. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were created using an inferior cerebellar reference region. RESULTS: Neocortical tracer retention was highly comparable using both SUVR and distribution volume ratio-1 values obtained from dynamic scans. However, [(18)F]RO948 retention was significantly higher in the entorhinal cortex and lower in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and choroid plexus compared with [(18)F]flortaucipir. Increased off-target binding was observed with age for both tracers. Several cases exhibited strong [(18)F]RO948 retention in the skull/meninges. This extra-cerebral signal, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy and remained relatively unchanged when re-examining a subsample after 1 year. Kinetic modeling showed an increase in [(18)F]flortaucipir SUVR over the scanning interval, compared with a plateau for [(18)F]RO948. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]RO948 and [(18)F]flortaucipir bound comparably in neocortical regions, but [(18)F]RO948 showed higher retention in the medial temporal lobe and lower intracerebral “off-target” binding. Time-dependent bias of SUVR estimates may prove less of a factor with [(18)F]RO948, compared with previous tau ligands. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6974501/ /pubmed/31612245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Smith, Ruben
Schöll, Michael
Leuzy, Antoine
Jögi, Jonas
Ohlsson, Tomas
Strandberg, Olof
Hansson, Oskar
Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
title Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
title_full Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
title_fullStr Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
title_short Head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]RO948
title_sort head-to-head comparison of tau positron emission tomography tracers [(18)f]flortaucipir and [(18)f]ro948
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04496-0
work_keys_str_mv AT smithruben headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948
AT schollmichael headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948
AT leuzyantoine headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948
AT jogijonas headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948
AT ohlssontomas headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948
AT strandbergolof headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948
AT hanssonoskar headtoheadcomparisonoftaupositronemissiontomographytracers18fflortaucipirand18fro948