Cargando…
Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
The development of dwarf wheat cultivars combined with high levels of agrochemical inputs during the green revolution resulted in high yielding cropping systems. However, changes in wheat cultivars were made without considering impacts on plant and soil microbe interactions. We studied the effect of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58402-y |
_version_ | 1783492451057532928 |
---|---|
author | Kavamura, Vanessa N. Robinson, Rebekah J. Hughes, David Clark, Ian Rossmann, Maike Melo, Itamar Soares de Hirsch, Penny R. Mendes, Rodrigo Mauchline, Tim H. |
author_facet | Kavamura, Vanessa N. Robinson, Rebekah J. Hughes, David Clark, Ian Rossmann, Maike Melo, Itamar Soares de Hirsch, Penny R. Mendes, Rodrigo Mauchline, Tim H. |
author_sort | Kavamura, Vanessa N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of dwarf wheat cultivars combined with high levels of agrochemical inputs during the green revolution resulted in high yielding cropping systems. However, changes in wheat cultivars were made without considering impacts on plant and soil microbe interactions. We studied the effect of these changes on root traits and on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities by comparing eight wheat cultivars ranging from tall to semi-dwarf plants grown under field conditions. Wheat breeding influenced root diameter and specific root length (SRL). Rhizosphere bacterial communities from tall cultivars were distinct from those associated with semi-dwarf cultivars, with higher differential abundance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria in tall cultivars, compared with a higher differential abundance of Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes and Acidobacteria in semi-dwarf cultivars. Predicted microbial functions were also impacted and network analysis revealed a greater level of connectedness between microbial communities in the tall cultivars relative to semi-dwarf cultivars. Taken together, results suggest that the development of semi-dwarf plants might have affected the ability of plants to recruit and sustain a complex bacterial community network in the rhizosphere. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6989667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69896672020-02-05 Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome Kavamura, Vanessa N. Robinson, Rebekah J. Hughes, David Clark, Ian Rossmann, Maike Melo, Itamar Soares de Hirsch, Penny R. Mendes, Rodrigo Mauchline, Tim H. Sci Rep Article The development of dwarf wheat cultivars combined with high levels of agrochemical inputs during the green revolution resulted in high yielding cropping systems. However, changes in wheat cultivars were made without considering impacts on plant and soil microbe interactions. We studied the effect of these changes on root traits and on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities by comparing eight wheat cultivars ranging from tall to semi-dwarf plants grown under field conditions. Wheat breeding influenced root diameter and specific root length (SRL). Rhizosphere bacterial communities from tall cultivars were distinct from those associated with semi-dwarf cultivars, with higher differential abundance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria in tall cultivars, compared with a higher differential abundance of Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes and Acidobacteria in semi-dwarf cultivars. Predicted microbial functions were also impacted and network analysis revealed a greater level of connectedness between microbial communities in the tall cultivars relative to semi-dwarf cultivars. Taken together, results suggest that the development of semi-dwarf plants might have affected the ability of plants to recruit and sustain a complex bacterial community network in the rhizosphere. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6989667/ /pubmed/31996781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58402-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kavamura, Vanessa N. Robinson, Rebekah J. Hughes, David Clark, Ian Rossmann, Maike Melo, Itamar Soares de Hirsch, Penny R. Mendes, Rodrigo Mauchline, Tim H. Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
title | Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
title_full | Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
title_fullStr | Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
title_short | Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
title_sort | wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58402-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavamuravanessan wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT robinsonrebekahj wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT hughesdavid wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT clarkian wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT rossmannmaike wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT meloitamarsoaresde wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT hirschpennyr wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT mendesrodrigo wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome AT mauchlinetimh wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome |