Cargando…

Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome

The development of dwarf wheat cultivars combined with high levels of agrochemical inputs during the green revolution resulted in high yielding cropping systems. However, changes in wheat cultivars were made without considering impacts on plant and soil microbe interactions. We studied the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavamura, Vanessa N., Robinson, Rebekah J., Hughes, David, Clark, Ian, Rossmann, Maike, Melo, Itamar Soares de, Hirsch, Penny R., Mendes, Rodrigo, Mauchline, Tim H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58402-y
_version_ 1783492451057532928
author Kavamura, Vanessa N.
Robinson, Rebekah J.
Hughes, David
Clark, Ian
Rossmann, Maike
Melo, Itamar Soares de
Hirsch, Penny R.
Mendes, Rodrigo
Mauchline, Tim H.
author_facet Kavamura, Vanessa N.
Robinson, Rebekah J.
Hughes, David
Clark, Ian
Rossmann, Maike
Melo, Itamar Soares de
Hirsch, Penny R.
Mendes, Rodrigo
Mauchline, Tim H.
author_sort Kavamura, Vanessa N.
collection PubMed
description The development of dwarf wheat cultivars combined with high levels of agrochemical inputs during the green revolution resulted in high yielding cropping systems. However, changes in wheat cultivars were made without considering impacts on plant and soil microbe interactions. We studied the effect of these changes on root traits and on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities by comparing eight wheat cultivars ranging from tall to semi-dwarf plants grown under field conditions. Wheat breeding influenced root diameter and specific root length (SRL). Rhizosphere bacterial communities from tall cultivars were distinct from those associated with semi-dwarf cultivars, with higher differential abundance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria in tall cultivars, compared with a higher differential abundance of Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes and Acidobacteria in semi-dwarf cultivars. Predicted microbial functions were also impacted and network analysis revealed a greater level of connectedness between microbial communities in the tall cultivars relative to semi-dwarf cultivars. Taken together, results suggest that the development of semi-dwarf plants might have affected the ability of plants to recruit and sustain a complex bacterial community network in the rhizosphere.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6989667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69896672020-02-05 Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome Kavamura, Vanessa N. Robinson, Rebekah J. Hughes, David Clark, Ian Rossmann, Maike Melo, Itamar Soares de Hirsch, Penny R. Mendes, Rodrigo Mauchline, Tim H. Sci Rep Article The development of dwarf wheat cultivars combined with high levels of agrochemical inputs during the green revolution resulted in high yielding cropping systems. However, changes in wheat cultivars were made without considering impacts on plant and soil microbe interactions. We studied the effect of these changes on root traits and on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities by comparing eight wheat cultivars ranging from tall to semi-dwarf plants grown under field conditions. Wheat breeding influenced root diameter and specific root length (SRL). Rhizosphere bacterial communities from tall cultivars were distinct from those associated with semi-dwarf cultivars, with higher differential abundance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria in tall cultivars, compared with a higher differential abundance of Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes and Acidobacteria in semi-dwarf cultivars. Predicted microbial functions were also impacted and network analysis revealed a greater level of connectedness between microbial communities in the tall cultivars relative to semi-dwarf cultivars. Taken together, results suggest that the development of semi-dwarf plants might have affected the ability of plants to recruit and sustain a complex bacterial community network in the rhizosphere. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6989667/ /pubmed/31996781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58402-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kavamura, Vanessa N.
Robinson, Rebekah J.
Hughes, David
Clark, Ian
Rossmann, Maike
Melo, Itamar Soares de
Hirsch, Penny R.
Mendes, Rodrigo
Mauchline, Tim H.
Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
title Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
title_full Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
title_fullStr Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
title_short Wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
title_sort wheat dwarfing influences selection of the rhizosphere microbiome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58402-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kavamuravanessan wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT robinsonrebekahj wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT hughesdavid wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT clarkian wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT rossmannmaike wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT meloitamarsoaresde wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT hirschpennyr wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT mendesrodrigo wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome
AT mauchlinetimh wheatdwarfinginfluencesselectionoftherhizospheremicrobiome