Cargando…

A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse

The muscular dystrophy X-linked (mdx) mouse is commonly used as a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Its phenotype is, however, mild, and other mouse models have been explored. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse carries a human-like mutation in the Cmah gene and has a severe muscle phenotype, bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Claire L., Suchacki, Karla J., van ’t Hof, Rob, Cawthorn, Will P., Dillon, Scott, Straub, Volker, Wong, Sze Choong, Ahmed, Syed F., Farquharson, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.040659
_version_ 1783493287223492608
author Wood, Claire L.
Suchacki, Karla J.
van ’t Hof, Rob
Cawthorn, Will P.
Dillon, Scott
Straub, Volker
Wong, Sze Choong
Ahmed, Syed F.
Farquharson, Colin
author_facet Wood, Claire L.
Suchacki, Karla J.
van ’t Hof, Rob
Cawthorn, Will P.
Dillon, Scott
Straub, Volker
Wong, Sze Choong
Ahmed, Syed F.
Farquharson, Colin
author_sort Wood, Claire L.
collection PubMed
description The muscular dystrophy X-linked (mdx) mouse is commonly used as a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Its phenotype is, however, mild, and other mouse models have been explored. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse carries a human-like mutation in the Cmah gene and has a severe muscle phenotype, but its growth and bone development are unknown. In this study, we compared male mdx, mdx:Utrn(+/−), mdx:Cmah(−/−) and wild-type (WT) mice at 3, 5 and 7 weeks of age to determine the suitability of the mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse as a model for assessing growth and skeletal development in DMD. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice were lighter than WT mice at 3 weeks, but heavier at 7 weeks, and showed an increased growth rate at 5 weeks. Cortical bone fraction as assessed by micro-computed tomography was greater in both mdx and mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice versus WT mice at 7 weeks. Tissue mineral density was also higher in mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice at 3 and 7 weeks. Gene profiling of mdx:Cmah(−/−) bone identified increased expression of Igf1, Igf1r and Vegfa. Both the mdx and mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice showed an increased proportion of regulated bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) but a reduction in constitutive BMAT. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice show evidence of catch-up growth and more rapid bone development. This pattern does not mimic the typical DMD growth trajectory and therefore the utility of the mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse for studying growth and skeletal development in DMD is limited. Further studies of this model may, however, shed light on the phenomenon of catch-up growth. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69949352020-02-03 A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse Wood, Claire L. Suchacki, Karla J. van ’t Hof, Rob Cawthorn, Will P. Dillon, Scott Straub, Volker Wong, Sze Choong Ahmed, Syed F. Farquharson, Colin Dis Model Mech Research Article The muscular dystrophy X-linked (mdx) mouse is commonly used as a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Its phenotype is, however, mild, and other mouse models have been explored. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse carries a human-like mutation in the Cmah gene and has a severe muscle phenotype, but its growth and bone development are unknown. In this study, we compared male mdx, mdx:Utrn(+/−), mdx:Cmah(−/−) and wild-type (WT) mice at 3, 5 and 7 weeks of age to determine the suitability of the mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse as a model for assessing growth and skeletal development in DMD. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice were lighter than WT mice at 3 weeks, but heavier at 7 weeks, and showed an increased growth rate at 5 weeks. Cortical bone fraction as assessed by micro-computed tomography was greater in both mdx and mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice versus WT mice at 7 weeks. Tissue mineral density was also higher in mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice at 3 and 7 weeks. Gene profiling of mdx:Cmah(−/−) bone identified increased expression of Igf1, Igf1r and Vegfa. Both the mdx and mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice showed an increased proportion of regulated bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) but a reduction in constitutive BMAT. The mdx:Cmah(−/−) mice show evidence of catch-up growth and more rapid bone development. This pattern does not mimic the typical DMD growth trajectory and therefore the utility of the mdx:Cmah(−/−) mouse for studying growth and skeletal development in DMD is limited. Further studies of this model may, however, shed light on the phenomenon of catch-up growth. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6994935/ /pubmed/31754018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.040659 Text en © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wood, Claire L.
Suchacki, Karla J.
van ’t Hof, Rob
Cawthorn, Will P.
Dillon, Scott
Straub, Volker
Wong, Sze Choong
Ahmed, Syed F.
Farquharson, Colin
A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse
title A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse
title_full A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse
title_fullStr A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse
title_short A comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:Cmah(−/−) and mdx:Utrn(+/−) murine models with the C57BL/10 wild-type mouse
title_sort comparison of the bone and growth phenotype of mdx, mdx:cmah(−/−) and mdx:utrn(+/−) murine models with the c57bl/10 wild-type mouse
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.040659
work_keys_str_mv AT woodclairel acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT suchackikarlaj acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT vanthofrob acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT cawthornwillp acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT dillonscott acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT straubvolker acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT wongszechoong acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT ahmedsyedf acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT farquharsoncolin acomparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT woodclairel comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT suchackikarlaj comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT vanthofrob comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT cawthornwillp comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT dillonscott comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT straubvolker comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT wongszechoong comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT ahmedsyedf comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse
AT farquharsoncolin comparisonoftheboneandgrowthphenotypeofmdxmdxcmahandmdxutrnmurinemodelswiththec57bl10wildtypemouse