Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

BACKGROUND: It is still uncertain whether coronary bifurcations with lesions involving a large side branch (SB) should be treated by stenting the main vessel and provisional stenting of the SB (simple) or by routine two-stent techniques (complex). We aimed to compare clinical outcome after treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumsars, Indulis, Holm, Niels Ramsing, Niemelä, Matti, Erglis, Andrejs, Kervinen, Kari, Christiansen, Evald Høj, Maeng, Michael, Dombrovskis, Andis, Abraitis, Vytautas, Kibarskis, Aleksandras, Trovik, Thor, Latkovskis, Gustavs, Sondore, Dace, Narbute, Inga, Terkelsen, Christian Juhl, Eskola, Markku, Romppanen, Hannu, Laine, Mika, Jensen, Lisette Okkels, Pietila, Mikko, Gunnes, Pål, Hebsgaard, Lasse, Frobert, Ole, Calais, Fredrik, Hartikainen, Juha, Aarøe, Jens, Ravkilde, Jan, Engstrøm, Thomas, Steigen, Terje K, Thuesen, Leif, Lassen, Jens F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Interventional Cardiology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947

Ejemplares similares