Cargando…
Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say
Background: In Uganda, perinatal mortality is 38 per 1000 pregnancies. One-third of these deaths are due to birth asphyxia. Adequate fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during labor may detect birth asphyxia but little is known about monitoring practices in low resource settings. Objective: To explore...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1711618 |
_version_ | 1783495189983133696 |
---|---|
author | Ayebare, Elizabeth Jonas, Wibke Ndeezi, Grace Nankunda, Jolly Hanson, Claudia Tumwine, James K. Hjelmstedt, Anna |
author_facet | Ayebare, Elizabeth Jonas, Wibke Ndeezi, Grace Nankunda, Jolly Hanson, Claudia Tumwine, James K. Hjelmstedt, Anna |
author_sort | Ayebare, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In Uganda, perinatal mortality is 38 per 1000 pregnancies. One-third of these deaths are due to birth asphyxia. Adequate fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during labor may detect birth asphyxia but little is known about monitoring practices in low resource settings. Objective: To explore FHR monitoring practices among health workers at a public hospital in Northern Uganda. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted by reviewing 251 maternal records and conducting 11 interviews and two focus group discussions with health workers complemented by observations of 42 women in labor until delivery. Quantitative data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Content analysis was used for qualitative data. Results: FHR was assessed in 235/251 (93.6%) of records at admission. Health workers documented the FHR at least once in 175/228 (76.8%) of cases during the first stage of labor compared to observed 17/25 (68.0%) cases. Median intervals between FHR monitoring were 30 (IQR 30–120) minutes in patients’ records versus 139 (IQR 87–662) minutes according to observations. Observations suggested no monitoring of FHR during the second stage of labor but records indicated monitoring in 3.2% of cases. Reported barriers to adequate FHR monitoring were inadequate number of staff and monitoring devices, institutional challenges such as few beds, documentation problems and perceived non-compliant women not reporting for repeated checks during the first stage of labor. Health workers demonstrated knowledge of national FHR monitoring guidelines and acknowledged that practice was different. Conclusions: When compared to national and international guidelines, FHR monitoring is sub-optimal in the studied setting. Approximately one in four women was not monitored during the first stage of labor. Barriers to appropriate FHR monitoring included shortage of staff and devices, institutional challenges and mother’s negative attitudes. These barriers need to be addressed in order to reduce neonatal mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7006641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70066412020-02-20 Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say Ayebare, Elizabeth Jonas, Wibke Ndeezi, Grace Nankunda, Jolly Hanson, Claudia Tumwine, James K. Hjelmstedt, Anna Glob Health Action Research Article Background: In Uganda, perinatal mortality is 38 per 1000 pregnancies. One-third of these deaths are due to birth asphyxia. Adequate fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during labor may detect birth asphyxia but little is known about monitoring practices in low resource settings. Objective: To explore FHR monitoring practices among health workers at a public hospital in Northern Uganda. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted by reviewing 251 maternal records and conducting 11 interviews and two focus group discussions with health workers complemented by observations of 42 women in labor until delivery. Quantitative data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Content analysis was used for qualitative data. Results: FHR was assessed in 235/251 (93.6%) of records at admission. Health workers documented the FHR at least once in 175/228 (76.8%) of cases during the first stage of labor compared to observed 17/25 (68.0%) cases. Median intervals between FHR monitoring were 30 (IQR 30–120) minutes in patients’ records versus 139 (IQR 87–662) minutes according to observations. Observations suggested no monitoring of FHR during the second stage of labor but records indicated monitoring in 3.2% of cases. Reported barriers to adequate FHR monitoring were inadequate number of staff and monitoring devices, institutional challenges such as few beds, documentation problems and perceived non-compliant women not reporting for repeated checks during the first stage of labor. Health workers demonstrated knowledge of national FHR monitoring guidelines and acknowledged that practice was different. Conclusions: When compared to national and international guidelines, FHR monitoring is sub-optimal in the studied setting. Approximately one in four women was not monitored during the first stage of labor. Barriers to appropriate FHR monitoring included shortage of staff and devices, institutional challenges and mother’s negative attitudes. These barriers need to be addressed in order to reduce neonatal mortality. Taylor & Francis 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7006641/ /pubmed/31955672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1711618 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ayebare, Elizabeth Jonas, Wibke Ndeezi, Grace Nankunda, Jolly Hanson, Claudia Tumwine, James K. Hjelmstedt, Anna Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
title | Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
title_full | Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
title_fullStr | Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
title_full_unstemmed | Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
title_short | Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
title_sort | fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in northern uganda – what health workers document, do and say |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1711618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ayebareelizabeth fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay AT jonaswibke fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay AT ndeezigrace fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay AT nankundajolly fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay AT hansonclaudia fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay AT tumwinejamesk fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay AT hjelmstedtanna fetalheartratemonitoringpracticesatapublichospitalinnorthernugandawhathealthworkersdocumentdoandsay |