Cargando…

Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare

INTRODUCTION: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer a flexible approach to online and distance learning, and are growing in popularity. Several MOOCs are now available, to help learners build on their knowledge in a number of healthcare topics. More research is needed to determine the effectiven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith-Lickess, Sian K, Woodhead, Tricia, Burhouse, Anna, Vasilakis, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031973
_version_ 1783495469055344640
author Smith-Lickess, Sian K
Woodhead, Tricia
Burhouse, Anna
Vasilakis, Christos
author_facet Smith-Lickess, Sian K
Woodhead, Tricia
Burhouse, Anna
Vasilakis, Christos
author_sort Smith-Lickess, Sian K
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer a flexible approach to online and distance learning, and are growing in popularity. Several MOOCs are now available, to help learners build on their knowledge in a number of healthcare topics. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of MOOCs as an online education tool, and explore their long-term impact on learners’ professional practice. We present a protocol describing the design of comprehensive, mixed-methods evaluation of a MOOC, ‘Quality Improvement (QI) in Healthcare: the Case for Change’, which aims to improve learner’s knowledge and understanding of QI approaches in healthcare, and to increase their confidence in participating, and possibly leading QI projects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pre-post study design using quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to evaluate the QI MOOC. Different elements of the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness and maintenance) and Kirkpatrick (reaction, learning and behaviour) models will be used to guide the evaluation. All learners who register for the course will be invited to participate in the QI MOOC evaluation study. Those who consent will be asked to complete a presurvey to assess baseline QI knowledge (self-report and objective) and perceived confidence in engaging in QI activities. On completion of the course, participants will complete a postsurvey measuring again knowledge and perceived confidence. Feedback on the course content and how it can be improved. A subset of participants will be invited to take part in a follow-up qualitative interview, 3 months after taking the course, to explore in depth how the MOOC impacted their behaviour in practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the University of Bath Human Research Ethics Committee (reference: 2958). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and disseminated at conference and departmental presentations, and more widely using social media, microblogging sites and periodicals aimed at healthcare professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70084162020-02-24 Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare Smith-Lickess, Sian K Woodhead, Tricia Burhouse, Anna Vasilakis, Christos BMJ Open Medical Education and Training INTRODUCTION: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer a flexible approach to online and distance learning, and are growing in popularity. Several MOOCs are now available, to help learners build on their knowledge in a number of healthcare topics. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of MOOCs as an online education tool, and explore their long-term impact on learners’ professional practice. We present a protocol describing the design of comprehensive, mixed-methods evaluation of a MOOC, ‘Quality Improvement (QI) in Healthcare: the Case for Change’, which aims to improve learner’s knowledge and understanding of QI approaches in healthcare, and to increase their confidence in participating, and possibly leading QI projects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pre-post study design using quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to evaluate the QI MOOC. Different elements of the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness and maintenance) and Kirkpatrick (reaction, learning and behaviour) models will be used to guide the evaluation. All learners who register for the course will be invited to participate in the QI MOOC evaluation study. Those who consent will be asked to complete a presurvey to assess baseline QI knowledge (self-report and objective) and perceived confidence in engaging in QI activities. On completion of the course, participants will complete a postsurvey measuring again knowledge and perceived confidence. Feedback on the course content and how it can be improved. A subset of participants will be invited to take part in a follow-up qualitative interview, 3 months after taking the course, to explore in depth how the MOOC impacted their behaviour in practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the University of Bath Human Research Ethics Committee (reference: 2958). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and disseminated at conference and departmental presentations, and more widely using social media, microblogging sites and periodicals aimed at healthcare professionals. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008416/ /pubmed/31874877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031973 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Smith-Lickess, Sian K
Woodhead, Tricia
Burhouse, Anna
Vasilakis, Christos
Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare
title Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare
title_full Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare
title_fullStr Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare
title_short Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare
title_sort study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a uk massive open online course (mooc) on quality improvement in healthcare
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031973
work_keys_str_mv AT smithlickesssiank studydesignandprotocolforacomprehensiveevaluationofaukmassiveopenonlinecoursemooconqualityimprovementinhealthcare
AT woodheadtricia studydesignandprotocolforacomprehensiveevaluationofaukmassiveopenonlinecoursemooconqualityimprovementinhealthcare
AT burhouseanna studydesignandprotocolforacomprehensiveevaluationofaukmassiveopenonlinecoursemooconqualityimprovementinhealthcare
AT vasilakischristos studydesignandprotocolforacomprehensiveevaluationofaukmassiveopenonlinecoursemooconqualityimprovementinhealthcare