Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36)
The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐beta‐D‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain DP‐Nzc36 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the product...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5839 |
_version_ | 1783495533512359936 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Riviere, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Marcon, Francesca Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Riviere, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Marcon, Francesca Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐beta‐D‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain DP‐Nzc36 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production, starch processing for the production of glucose syrups and brewing processes. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by distillation and starch processing, no dietary exposure was calculated for these food processes. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme‐total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.131 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of at least 97.6 mg TOS/kg bw per day which, compared to the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 745. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure can be excluded in distilled alcohol production and is considered to be low when the enzyme is used in starch processing and brewing processes. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70087982020-07-02 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Riviere, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Marcon, Francesca Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐beta‐D‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain DP‐Nzc36 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production, starch processing for the production of glucose syrups and brewing processes. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by distillation and starch processing, no dietary exposure was calculated for these food processes. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme‐total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.131 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of at least 97.6 mg TOS/kg bw per day which, compared to the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 745. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure can be excluded in distilled alcohol production and is considered to be low when the enzyme is used in starch processing and brewing processes. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7008798/ /pubmed/32626137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5839 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Riviere, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Marcon, Francesca Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzc36) |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from trichoderma reesei (strain dp‐nzc36) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5839 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT marconfrancesca safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT maiajoaquim safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromtrichodermareeseistraindpnzc36 |