Cargando…
Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species
The product under assessment is a preparation containing single strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus casei to be used as a technological additive to improve the ensiling process. EFSA has been previously requested by the European Commission to evaluate this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5700 |
_version_ | 1783495602862030848 |
---|---|
author | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna de Lourdes Bastos, Maria Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla Innocenti, Matteo López‐Gálvez, Gloria Sofianidis, Konstantinos Vettori, Maria Vittoria Brozzi, Rosella |
author_facet | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna de Lourdes Bastos, Maria Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla Innocenti, Matteo López‐Gálvez, Gloria Sofianidis, Konstantinos Vettori, Maria Vittoria Brozzi, Rosella |
collection | PubMed |
description | The product under assessment is a preparation containing single strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus casei to be used as a technological additive to improve the ensiling process. EFSA has been previously requested by the European Commission to evaluate this product. The safety of the additive for consumers, users, the environment and target animals was established at that time. There was, evidence for improved aerobic stability in forage materials with dry matter contents varying between 30% and 70%. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation methods were also introduced and a different culture medium to better characterise the additive but the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel) remains unable to identify a minimum specification for the product or a minimum effective dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091462020-07-02 Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna de Lourdes Bastos, Maria Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla Innocenti, Matteo López‐Gálvez, Gloria Sofianidis, Konstantinos Vettori, Maria Vittoria Brozzi, Rosella EFSA J Scientific Opinion The product under assessment is a preparation containing single strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus casei to be used as a technological additive to improve the ensiling process. EFSA has been previously requested by the European Commission to evaluate this product. The safety of the additive for consumers, users, the environment and target animals was established at that time. There was, evidence for improved aerobic stability in forage materials with dry matter contents varying between 30% and 70%. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation methods were also introduced and a different culture medium to better characterise the additive but the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel) remains unable to identify a minimum specification for the product or a minimum effective dose. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7009146/ /pubmed/32626298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5700 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna de Lourdes Bastos, Maria Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla Innocenti, Matteo López‐Gálvez, Gloria Sofianidis, Konstantinos Vettori, Maria Vittoria Brozzi, Rosella Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
title | Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
title_full | Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
title_short | Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203, Lactobacillus plantarum NBRC 3070 and Lactobacillus casei NBRC 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
title_sort | efficacy of saccharomyces cerevisiae nbrc 0203, lactobacillus plantarum nbrc 3070 and lactobacillus casei nbrc 3425 as a technological additive (silage additive) for all animal species |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT bampidisvasileios efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT azimontigiovanna efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT delourdesbastosmaria efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT christensenhenrik efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT dusemundbirgit efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT koubamaryline efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT kosdurjavamojca efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezalonsomarta efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezpuentesecundino efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT marconfrancesca efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT mayobaltasar efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT pechovaalena efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT petkovamariana efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT ramosfernando efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT sanzyolanda efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT villarobertoedoardo efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT woutersenruud efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT galobartjaume efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT gregorettilucilla efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT innocentimatteo efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezgalvezgloria efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT sofianidiskonstantinos efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT vettorimariavittoria efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT brozzirosella efficacyofsaccharomycescerevisiaenbrc0203lactobacillusplantarumnbrc3070andlactobacilluscaseinbrc3425asatechnologicaladditivesilageadditiveforallanimalspecies |