Cargando…
Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the flavouring substances caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4729 |
_version_ | 1783495762840125440 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Smith, Andrew Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Beckman Sundh, Ulla Brimer, Leon Mosesso, Pasquale Mulder, Gerard Anastassiadou, Maria Arcella, Davide Carfí, Maria Valtueña Martinez, Silvia Mennes, Wim |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Smith, Andrew Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Beckman Sundh, Ulla Brimer, Leon Mosesso, Pasquale Mulder, Gerard Anastassiadou, Maria Arcella, Davide Carfí, Maria Valtueña Martinez, Silvia Mennes, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the flavouring substances caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1. Consequent to the 2015 scientific opinion from the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the safety of caffeine from all dietary sources, the CEF Panel considered it inappropriate to evaluate the two substances through the Procedure. For caffeine, the Panel based its assessment on the safety threshold of 5.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for adults, except pregnant/lactating women, and 3 mg/kg bw per day for children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women, as established by the NDA Panel. The safety evaluation of theobromine takes into account that approximately 11% of an oral dose of caffeine is metabolised to theobromine and that both substances have a similar pharmacological profile. For the exposure assessment, a brand loyalty model was chosen. In this model, it was assumed that a consumer is exposed on a long‐term basis to a specific category of food (i.e. non‐alcoholic beverages), containing caffeine or theobromine at their respective maximum use levels. For the rest of the categories, normal use levels applied. Daily dietary exposure to caffeine and theobromine (excluding systemic exposure) added as a chemically defined flavouring substance ranged 0–2.3 and 0–0.4 mg/kg bw, respectively, across all population groups. The Panel concluded that caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] would not be expected to present safety concern based on their estimated levels of intake from their use as flavouring substances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70098802020-07-02 Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Smith, Andrew Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Beckman Sundh, Ulla Brimer, Leon Mosesso, Pasquale Mulder, Gerard Anastassiadou, Maria Arcella, Davide Carfí, Maria Valtueña Martinez, Silvia Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the flavouring substances caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1. Consequent to the 2015 scientific opinion from the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the safety of caffeine from all dietary sources, the CEF Panel considered it inappropriate to evaluate the two substances through the Procedure. For caffeine, the Panel based its assessment on the safety threshold of 5.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for adults, except pregnant/lactating women, and 3 mg/kg bw per day for children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women, as established by the NDA Panel. The safety evaluation of theobromine takes into account that approximately 11% of an oral dose of caffeine is metabolised to theobromine and that both substances have a similar pharmacological profile. For the exposure assessment, a brand loyalty model was chosen. In this model, it was assumed that a consumer is exposed on a long‐term basis to a specific category of food (i.e. non‐alcoholic beverages), containing caffeine or theobromine at their respective maximum use levels. For the rest of the categories, normal use levels applied. Daily dietary exposure to caffeine and theobromine (excluding systemic exposure) added as a chemically defined flavouring substance ranged 0–2.3 and 0–0.4 mg/kg bw, respectively, across all population groups. The Panel concluded that caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] would not be expected to present safety concern based on their estimated levels of intake from their use as flavouring substances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7009880/ /pubmed/32625452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4729 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Smith, Andrew Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Beckman Sundh, Ulla Brimer, Leon Mosesso, Pasquale Mulder, Gerard Anastassiadou, Maria Arcella, Davide Carfí, Maria Valtueña Martinez, Silvia Mennes, Wim Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
title | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
title_full | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
title_short | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
title_sort | scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 49, revision 1 (fge.49rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT silanovittorio scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT cravedijeanpierre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT fowlerpaul scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT franzroland scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT grobkonrad scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT karenlampisirpa scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT milanamariarosaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT penninksandre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT tavarespocasmariadefatima scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT smithandrew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT tlustoschristina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT wolfledetlef scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT zornholger scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT zugravucorinaaurelia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT beckmansundhulla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT brimerleon scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT mosessopasquale scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT muldergerard scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT anastassiadoumaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT arcelladavide scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT valtuenamartinezsilvia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist |