Cargando…

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the flavouring substances caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silano, Vittorio, Bolognesi, Claudia, Castle, Laurence, Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Franz, Roland, Grob, Konrad, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Kärenlampi, Sirpa, Milana, Maria Rosaria, Penninks, André, Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima, Smith, Andrew, Tlustos, Christina, Wölfle, Detlef, Zorn, Holger, Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia, Beckman Sundh, Ulla, Brimer, Leon, Mosesso, Pasquale, Mulder, Gerard, Anastassiadou, Maria, Arcella, Davide, Carfí, Maria, Valtueña Martinez, Silvia, Mennes, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625452
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4729
_version_ 1783495762840125440
author Silano, Vittorio
Bolognesi, Claudia
Castle, Laurence
Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Franz, Roland
Grob, Konrad
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Milana, Maria Rosaria
Penninks, André
Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima
Smith, Andrew
Tlustos, Christina
Wölfle, Detlef
Zorn, Holger
Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia
Beckman Sundh, Ulla
Brimer, Leon
Mosesso, Pasquale
Mulder, Gerard
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arcella, Davide
Carfí, Maria
Valtueña Martinez, Silvia
Mennes, Wim
author_facet Silano, Vittorio
Bolognesi, Claudia
Castle, Laurence
Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Franz, Roland
Grob, Konrad
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Milana, Maria Rosaria
Penninks, André
Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima
Smith, Andrew
Tlustos, Christina
Wölfle, Detlef
Zorn, Holger
Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia
Beckman Sundh, Ulla
Brimer, Leon
Mosesso, Pasquale
Mulder, Gerard
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arcella, Davide
Carfí, Maria
Valtueña Martinez, Silvia
Mennes, Wim
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the flavouring substances caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1. Consequent to the 2015 scientific opinion from the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the safety of caffeine from all dietary sources, the CEF Panel considered it inappropriate to evaluate the two substances through the Procedure. For caffeine, the Panel based its assessment on the safety threshold of 5.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for adults, except pregnant/lactating women, and 3 mg/kg bw per day for children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women, as established by the NDA Panel. The safety evaluation of theobromine takes into account that approximately 11% of an oral dose of caffeine is metabolised to theobromine and that both substances have a similar pharmacological profile. For the exposure assessment, a brand loyalty model was chosen. In this model, it was assumed that a consumer is exposed on a long‐term basis to a specific category of food (i.e. non‐alcoholic beverages), containing caffeine or theobromine at their respective maximum use levels. For the rest of the categories, normal use levels applied. Daily dietary exposure to caffeine and theobromine (excluding systemic exposure) added as a chemically defined flavouring substance ranged 0–2.3 and 0–0.4 mg/kg bw, respectively, across all population groups. The Panel concluded that caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] would not be expected to present safety concern based on their estimated levels of intake from their use as flavouring substances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70098802020-07-02 Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Smith, Andrew Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Beckman Sundh, Ulla Brimer, Leon Mosesso, Pasquale Mulder, Gerard Anastassiadou, Maria Arcella, Davide Carfí, Maria Valtueña Martinez, Silvia Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety assessment of the flavouring substances caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1. Consequent to the 2015 scientific opinion from the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the safety of caffeine from all dietary sources, the CEF Panel considered it inappropriate to evaluate the two substances through the Procedure. For caffeine, the Panel based its assessment on the safety threshold of 5.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for adults, except pregnant/lactating women, and 3 mg/kg bw per day for children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women, as established by the NDA Panel. The safety evaluation of theobromine takes into account that approximately 11% of an oral dose of caffeine is metabolised to theobromine and that both substances have a similar pharmacological profile. For the exposure assessment, a brand loyalty model was chosen. In this model, it was assumed that a consumer is exposed on a long‐term basis to a specific category of food (i.e. non‐alcoholic beverages), containing caffeine or theobromine at their respective maximum use levels. For the rest of the categories, normal use levels applied. Daily dietary exposure to caffeine and theobromine (excluding systemic exposure) added as a chemically defined flavouring substance ranged 0–2.3 and 0–0.4 mg/kg bw, respectively, across all population groups. The Panel concluded that caffeine [FL‐no: 16.016] and theobromine [FL‐no: 16.032] would not be expected to present safety concern based on their estimated levels of intake from their use as flavouring substances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7009880/ /pubmed/32625452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4729 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Silano, Vittorio
Bolognesi, Claudia
Castle, Laurence
Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Franz, Roland
Grob, Konrad
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Milana, Maria Rosaria
Penninks, André
Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima
Smith, Andrew
Tlustos, Christina
Wölfle, Detlef
Zorn, Holger
Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia
Beckman Sundh, Ulla
Brimer, Leon
Mosesso, Pasquale
Mulder, Gerard
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arcella, Davide
Carfí, Maria
Valtueña Martinez, Silvia
Mennes, Wim
Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
title Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
title_full Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
title_short Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 49, Revision 1 (FGE.49Rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
title_sort scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 49, revision 1 (fge.49rev1): xanthine alkaloids from the priority list
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625452
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4729
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT silanovittorio scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT cravedijeanpierre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT fowlerpaul scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT franzroland scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT grobkonrad scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT karenlampisirpa scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT milanamariarosaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT penninksandre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT tavarespocasmariadefatima scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT smithandrew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT tlustoschristina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT wolfledetlef scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT zornholger scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT zugravucorinaaurelia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT beckmansundhulla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT brimerleon scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT mosessopasquale scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT muldergerard scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT anastassiadoumaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT arcelladavide scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT valtuenamartinezsilvia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist
AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation49revision1fge49rev1xanthinealkaloidsfromtheprioritylist