Cargando…

Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis

Auditory frequency discrimination has been used as an index of sensory processing in developmental language disorders such as dyslexia, where group differences have often been interpreted as evidence for a basic deficit in auditory processing that underpins and constrains individual variability in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witton, Caroline, Swoboda, Katy, Shapiro, Laura R., Talcott, Joel B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.1645
_version_ 1783498940023308288
author Witton, Caroline
Swoboda, Katy
Shapiro, Laura R.
Talcott, Joel B.
author_facet Witton, Caroline
Swoboda, Katy
Shapiro, Laura R.
Talcott, Joel B.
author_sort Witton, Caroline
collection PubMed
description Auditory frequency discrimination has been used as an index of sensory processing in developmental language disorders such as dyslexia, where group differences have often been interpreted as evidence for a basic deficit in auditory processing that underpins and constrains individual variability in the development of phonological skills. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the cumulative evidence for group differences in frequency discrimination and to explore the impact of some potential moderator variables that could contribute to variability in effect‐size estimations across studies. Our analyses revealed mean effect sizes for group differences on frequency discrimination tasks on the order of three‐quarters of a standard deviation, but in the presence of substantial inter‐study variability in their magnitude. Moderator variable analyses indicated that factors related both to participant variability on behavioural and cognitive variables associated with the dyslexia phenotype, and to variability in the task design, contributed to differences in the magnitude of effect size across studies. The apparently complex pattern of results was compounded by the lack of concurrent, standardised metrics of cognitive and reading component skills across the constituent studies. Differences on sensory processing tasks are often reported in studies of developmental disorders, but these need to be more carefully interpreted in the context of non‐sensory factors, which may explain significant inter‐ and intra‐group variance in the dependent measure of interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7028017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70280172020-02-25 Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis Witton, Caroline Swoboda, Katy Shapiro, Laura R. Talcott, Joel B. Dyslexia Research Articles Auditory frequency discrimination has been used as an index of sensory processing in developmental language disorders such as dyslexia, where group differences have often been interpreted as evidence for a basic deficit in auditory processing that underpins and constrains individual variability in the development of phonological skills. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis to evaluate the cumulative evidence for group differences in frequency discrimination and to explore the impact of some potential moderator variables that could contribute to variability in effect‐size estimations across studies. Our analyses revealed mean effect sizes for group differences on frequency discrimination tasks on the order of three‐quarters of a standard deviation, but in the presence of substantial inter‐study variability in their magnitude. Moderator variable analyses indicated that factors related both to participant variability on behavioural and cognitive variables associated with the dyslexia phenotype, and to variability in the task design, contributed to differences in the magnitude of effect size across studies. The apparently complex pattern of results was compounded by the lack of concurrent, standardised metrics of cognitive and reading component skills across the constituent studies. Differences on sensory processing tasks are often reported in studies of developmental disorders, but these need to be more carefully interpreted in the context of non‐sensory factors, which may explain significant inter‐ and intra‐group variance in the dependent measure of interest. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-26 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7028017/ /pubmed/31877576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.1645 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Dyslexia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Witton, Caroline
Swoboda, Katy
Shapiro, Laura R.
Talcott, Joel B.
Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis
title Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis
title_full Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis
title_short Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis
title_sort auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: a meta‐analysis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.1645
work_keys_str_mv AT wittoncaroline auditoryfrequencydiscriminationindevelopmentaldyslexiaametaanalysis
AT swobodakaty auditoryfrequencydiscriminationindevelopmentaldyslexiaametaanalysis
AT shapirolaurar auditoryfrequencydiscriminationindevelopmentaldyslexiaametaanalysis
AT talcottjoelb auditoryfrequencydiscriminationindevelopmentaldyslexiaametaanalysis