Cargando…
Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty occurs frequently in emergency medical care, with more than one-third of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without a clear diagnosis. Despite this frequency, ED providers are not adequately trained on how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with these pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1926-y |
_version_ | 1783499197642702848 |
---|---|
author | McCarthy, Danielle M. Powell, Rhea E. Cameron, Kenzie A. Salzman, David H. Papanagnou, Dimitrios Doty, Amanda MB. Leiby, Benjamin E. Piserchia, Katherine Klein, Matthew R. Zhang, Xiao C. McGaghie, William C. Rising, Kristin L. |
author_facet | McCarthy, Danielle M. Powell, Rhea E. Cameron, Kenzie A. Salzman, David H. Papanagnou, Dimitrios Doty, Amanda MB. Leiby, Benjamin E. Piserchia, Katherine Klein, Matthew R. Zhang, Xiao C. McGaghie, William C. Rising, Kristin L. |
author_sort | McCarthy, Danielle M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty occurs frequently in emergency medical care, with more than one-third of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without a clear diagnosis. Despite this frequency, ED providers are not adequately trained on how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with these patients, who often leave the ED confused and concerned. To address this training need, we developed the Uncertainty Communication Education Module (UCEM) to teach physicians how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the UCEM in improving physician communications. METHODS: The trial is a multicenter, two-arm randomized controlled trial designed to teach communication skills using simulation-based mastery learning (SBML). Resident emergency physicians from two training programs will be randomly assigned to immediate or delayed receipt of the two-part UCEM intervention after completing a baseline standardized patient encounter. The two UCEM components are: 1) a web-based interactive module, and 2) a smart-phone-based game. Both formats teach and reinforce communication skills for patient cases involving diagnostic uncertainty. Following baseline testing, participants in the immediate intervention arm will complete a remote deliberate practice session via a video platform and subsequently return for a second study visit to assess if they have achieved mastery. Participants in the delayed intervention arm will receive access to UCEM and remote deliberate practice after the second study visit. The primary outcome of interest is the proportion of residents in the immediate intervention arm who achieve mastery at the second study visit. DISCUSSION: Patients’ understanding of the care they received has implications for care quality, safety, and patient satisfaction, especially when they are discharged without a definitive diagnosis. Developing a patient-centered diagnostic uncertainty communication strategy will improve safety of acute care discharges. Although use of SBML is a resource intensive educational approach, this trial has been deliberately designed to have a low-resource, scalable intervention that would allow for widespread dissemination and uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04021771). Registration date: July 16, 2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7029572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70295722020-02-25 Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial McCarthy, Danielle M. Powell, Rhea E. Cameron, Kenzie A. Salzman, David H. Papanagnou, Dimitrios Doty, Amanda MB. Leiby, Benjamin E. Piserchia, Katherine Klein, Matthew R. Zhang, Xiao C. McGaghie, William C. Rising, Kristin L. BMC Med Educ Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty occurs frequently in emergency medical care, with more than one-third of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without a clear diagnosis. Despite this frequency, ED providers are not adequately trained on how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with these patients, who often leave the ED confused and concerned. To address this training need, we developed the Uncertainty Communication Education Module (UCEM) to teach physicians how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the UCEM in improving physician communications. METHODS: The trial is a multicenter, two-arm randomized controlled trial designed to teach communication skills using simulation-based mastery learning (SBML). Resident emergency physicians from two training programs will be randomly assigned to immediate or delayed receipt of the two-part UCEM intervention after completing a baseline standardized patient encounter. The two UCEM components are: 1) a web-based interactive module, and 2) a smart-phone-based game. Both formats teach and reinforce communication skills for patient cases involving diagnostic uncertainty. Following baseline testing, participants in the immediate intervention arm will complete a remote deliberate practice session via a video platform and subsequently return for a second study visit to assess if they have achieved mastery. Participants in the delayed intervention arm will receive access to UCEM and remote deliberate practice after the second study visit. The primary outcome of interest is the proportion of residents in the immediate intervention arm who achieve mastery at the second study visit. DISCUSSION: Patients’ understanding of the care they received has implications for care quality, safety, and patient satisfaction, especially when they are discharged without a definitive diagnosis. Developing a patient-centered diagnostic uncertainty communication strategy will improve safety of acute care discharges. Although use of SBML is a resource intensive educational approach, this trial has been deliberately designed to have a low-resource, scalable intervention that would allow for widespread dissemination and uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04021771). Registration date: July 16, 2019. BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7029572/ /pubmed/32070353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1926-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol McCarthy, Danielle M. Powell, Rhea E. Cameron, Kenzie A. Salzman, David H. Papanagnou, Dimitrios Doty, Amanda MB. Leiby, Benjamin E. Piserchia, Katherine Klein, Matthew R. Zhang, Xiao C. McGaghie, William C. Rising, Kristin L. Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1926-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthydaniellem simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT powellrheae simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cameronkenziea simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT salzmandavidh simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT papanagnoudimitrios simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dotyamandamb simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leibybenjamine simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT piserchiakatherine simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kleinmatthewr simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangxiaoc simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcgaghiewilliamc simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT risingkristinl simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial |