Cargando…

Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty occurs frequently in emergency medical care, with more than one-third of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without a clear diagnosis. Despite this frequency, ED providers are not adequately trained on how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with these pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, Danielle M., Powell, Rhea E., Cameron, Kenzie A., Salzman, David H., Papanagnou, Dimitrios, Doty, Amanda MB., Leiby, Benjamin E., Piserchia, Katherine, Klein, Matthew R., Zhang, Xiao C., McGaghie, William C., Rising, Kristin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1926-y
_version_ 1783499197642702848
author McCarthy, Danielle M.
Powell, Rhea E.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Salzman, David H.
Papanagnou, Dimitrios
Doty, Amanda MB.
Leiby, Benjamin E.
Piserchia, Katherine
Klein, Matthew R.
Zhang, Xiao C.
McGaghie, William C.
Rising, Kristin L.
author_facet McCarthy, Danielle M.
Powell, Rhea E.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Salzman, David H.
Papanagnou, Dimitrios
Doty, Amanda MB.
Leiby, Benjamin E.
Piserchia, Katherine
Klein, Matthew R.
Zhang, Xiao C.
McGaghie, William C.
Rising, Kristin L.
author_sort McCarthy, Danielle M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty occurs frequently in emergency medical care, with more than one-third of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without a clear diagnosis. Despite this frequency, ED providers are not adequately trained on how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with these patients, who often leave the ED confused and concerned. To address this training need, we developed the Uncertainty Communication Education Module (UCEM) to teach physicians how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the UCEM in improving physician communications. METHODS: The trial is a multicenter, two-arm randomized controlled trial designed to teach communication skills using simulation-based mastery learning (SBML). Resident emergency physicians from two training programs will be randomly assigned to immediate or delayed receipt of the two-part UCEM intervention after completing a baseline standardized patient encounter. The two UCEM components are: 1) a web-based interactive module, and 2) a smart-phone-based game. Both formats teach and reinforce communication skills for patient cases involving diagnostic uncertainty. Following baseline testing, participants in the immediate intervention arm will complete a remote deliberate practice session via a video platform and subsequently return for a second study visit to assess if they have achieved mastery. Participants in the delayed intervention arm will receive access to UCEM and remote deliberate practice after the second study visit. The primary outcome of interest is the proportion of residents in the immediate intervention arm who achieve mastery at the second study visit. DISCUSSION: Patients’ understanding of the care they received has implications for care quality, safety, and patient satisfaction, especially when they are discharged without a definitive diagnosis. Developing a patient-centered diagnostic uncertainty communication strategy will improve safety of acute care discharges. Although use of SBML is a resource intensive educational approach, this trial has been deliberately designed to have a low-resource, scalable intervention that would allow for widespread dissemination and uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04021771). Registration date: July 16, 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70295722020-02-25 Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial McCarthy, Danielle M. Powell, Rhea E. Cameron, Kenzie A. Salzman, David H. Papanagnou, Dimitrios Doty, Amanda MB. Leiby, Benjamin E. Piserchia, Katherine Klein, Matthew R. Zhang, Xiao C. McGaghie, William C. Rising, Kristin L. BMC Med Educ Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty occurs frequently in emergency medical care, with more than one-third of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) without a clear diagnosis. Despite this frequency, ED providers are not adequately trained on how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with these patients, who often leave the ED confused and concerned. To address this training need, we developed the Uncertainty Communication Education Module (UCEM) to teach physicians how to discuss diagnostic uncertainty. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the UCEM in improving physician communications. METHODS: The trial is a multicenter, two-arm randomized controlled trial designed to teach communication skills using simulation-based mastery learning (SBML). Resident emergency physicians from two training programs will be randomly assigned to immediate or delayed receipt of the two-part UCEM intervention after completing a baseline standardized patient encounter. The two UCEM components are: 1) a web-based interactive module, and 2) a smart-phone-based game. Both formats teach and reinforce communication skills for patient cases involving diagnostic uncertainty. Following baseline testing, participants in the immediate intervention arm will complete a remote deliberate practice session via a video platform and subsequently return for a second study visit to assess if they have achieved mastery. Participants in the delayed intervention arm will receive access to UCEM and remote deliberate practice after the second study visit. The primary outcome of interest is the proportion of residents in the immediate intervention arm who achieve mastery at the second study visit. DISCUSSION: Patients’ understanding of the care they received has implications for care quality, safety, and patient satisfaction, especially when they are discharged without a definitive diagnosis. Developing a patient-centered diagnostic uncertainty communication strategy will improve safety of acute care discharges. Although use of SBML is a resource intensive educational approach, this trial has been deliberately designed to have a low-resource, scalable intervention that would allow for widespread dissemination and uptake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04021771). Registration date: July 16, 2019. BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7029572/ /pubmed/32070353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1926-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
McCarthy, Danielle M.
Powell, Rhea E.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Salzman, David H.
Papanagnou, Dimitrios
Doty, Amanda MB.
Leiby, Benjamin E.
Piserchia, Katherine
Klein, Matthew R.
Zhang, Xiao C.
McGaghie, William C.
Rising, Kristin L.
Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
title Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1926-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarthydaniellem simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT powellrheae simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cameronkenziea simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT salzmandavidh simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT papanagnoudimitrios simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dotyamandamb simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leibybenjamine simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT piserchiakatherine simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kleinmatthewr simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangxiaoc simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgaghiewilliamc simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT risingkristinl simulationbasedmasterylearningcomparedtostandardeducationfordiscussingdiagnosticuncertaintywithpatientsintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrial