Cargando…

Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art

In a time of increasing threats and decreasing financial resources, monitoring and controlling all possible foodborne hazards at the same time and to the same extent has become more challenging than ever. Therefore, attention is increasingly being paid to the so-called “risk ranking” methods that en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devleesschauwer, Brecht, Bouwknegt, Martijn, Dorny, Pierre, Gabriël, Sarah, Havelaar, Arie H., Quoilin, Sophie, Robertson, Lucy J., Speybroeck, Niko, Torgerson, Paul R., van der Giessen, Joke W.B., Trevisan, Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2017.11.001
_version_ 1783499791429271552
author Devleesschauwer, Brecht
Bouwknegt, Martijn
Dorny, Pierre
Gabriël, Sarah
Havelaar, Arie H.
Quoilin, Sophie
Robertson, Lucy J.
Speybroeck, Niko
Torgerson, Paul R.
van der Giessen, Joke W.B.
Trevisan, Chiara
author_facet Devleesschauwer, Brecht
Bouwknegt, Martijn
Dorny, Pierre
Gabriël, Sarah
Havelaar, Arie H.
Quoilin, Sophie
Robertson, Lucy J.
Speybroeck, Niko
Torgerson, Paul R.
van der Giessen, Joke W.B.
Trevisan, Chiara
author_sort Devleesschauwer, Brecht
collection PubMed
description In a time of increasing threats and decreasing financial resources, monitoring and controlling all possible foodborne hazards at the same time and to the same extent has become more challenging than ever. Therefore, attention is increasingly being paid to the so-called “risk ranking” methods that enable decision makers to focus on the most important foodborne hazards — even when time is limited and knowledge incomplete. In this review paper, we provide an overview of the most common quantitative methods and metrics used for ranking the risks associated with foodborne parasites and present the state of the art on risk ranking exercises for foodborne parasites. A number of risk ranking metrics and methods are available, ranging from simple approaches that can be used to assess the health or economic impact of a foodborne parasitic disease, to more complicated but more comprehensive multi-criteria assessments. For health impact assessment, measures of population health such as disease occurrence and number of deaths; Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) measuring the healthy life years lost; and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) measuring the number of life years lived in optimal health, are described. For economic impact assessment, applied approaches that measure the cost-of-illness from a societal perspective and stated preference methods are outlined. Finally, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which can be used to integrate multiple metrics and criteria into a single ranking, is described. These risk ranking methods for foodborne parasites are increasingly performed to aid priority setting at global, regional, and national levels. As different stakeholders have their own prioritization objectives and beliefs, the outcome of such exercises is necessarily context-dependent. Therefore, when designing a risk ranking exercise for foodborne parasites, it is important to choose the metrics and methods, as well as what to rank, in the light of the predefined context of the question being addressed and the target audience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7034010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70340102020-02-24 Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art Devleesschauwer, Brecht Bouwknegt, Martijn Dorny, Pierre Gabriël, Sarah Havelaar, Arie H. Quoilin, Sophie Robertson, Lucy J. Speybroeck, Niko Torgerson, Paul R. van der Giessen, Joke W.B. Trevisan, Chiara Food Waterborne Parasitol Article In a time of increasing threats and decreasing financial resources, monitoring and controlling all possible foodborne hazards at the same time and to the same extent has become more challenging than ever. Therefore, attention is increasingly being paid to the so-called “risk ranking” methods that enable decision makers to focus on the most important foodborne hazards — even when time is limited and knowledge incomplete. In this review paper, we provide an overview of the most common quantitative methods and metrics used for ranking the risks associated with foodborne parasites and present the state of the art on risk ranking exercises for foodborne parasites. A number of risk ranking metrics and methods are available, ranging from simple approaches that can be used to assess the health or economic impact of a foodborne parasitic disease, to more complicated but more comprehensive multi-criteria assessments. For health impact assessment, measures of population health such as disease occurrence and number of deaths; Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) measuring the healthy life years lost; and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) measuring the number of life years lived in optimal health, are described. For economic impact assessment, applied approaches that measure the cost-of-illness from a societal perspective and stated preference methods are outlined. Finally, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which can be used to integrate multiple metrics and criteria into a single ranking, is described. These risk ranking methods for foodborne parasites are increasingly performed to aid priority setting at global, regional, and national levels. As different stakeholders have their own prioritization objectives and beliefs, the outcome of such exercises is necessarily context-dependent. Therefore, when designing a risk ranking exercise for foodborne parasites, it is important to choose the metrics and methods, as well as what to rank, in the light of the predefined context of the question being addressed and the target audience. Elsevier 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7034010/ /pubmed/32095638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2017.11.001 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Association of Food and Waterborne Parasitology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Devleesschauwer, Brecht
Bouwknegt, Martijn
Dorny, Pierre
Gabriël, Sarah
Havelaar, Arie H.
Quoilin, Sophie
Robertson, Lucy J.
Speybroeck, Niko
Torgerson, Paul R.
van der Giessen, Joke W.B.
Trevisan, Chiara
Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art
title Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art
title_full Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art
title_fullStr Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art
title_full_unstemmed Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art
title_short Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art
title_sort risk ranking of foodborne parasites: state of the art
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2017.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT devleesschauwerbrecht riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT bouwknegtmartijn riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT dornypierre riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT gabrielsarah riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT havelaararieh riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT quoilinsophie riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT robertsonlucyj riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT speybroeckniko riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT torgersonpaulr riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT vandergiessenjokewb riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart
AT trevisanchiara riskrankingoffoodborneparasitesstateoftheart