Cargando…

Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery

PURPOSE: A frequently mentioned lack of teleoperated surgical robots is the lack of haptic feedback. Haptics are not only able to mirror force information from the situs, but also to provide spatial guidance according to a surgical plan. However, superposition of the two haptic information can lead...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schleer, Philipp, Kaiser, Philipp, Drobinsky, Sergey, Radermacher, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02118-x
_version_ 1783500146631245824
author Schleer, Philipp
Kaiser, Philipp
Drobinsky, Sergey
Radermacher, Klaus
author_facet Schleer, Philipp
Kaiser, Philipp
Drobinsky, Sergey
Radermacher, Klaus
author_sort Schleer, Philipp
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A frequently mentioned lack of teleoperated surgical robots is the lack of haptic feedback. Haptics are not only able to mirror force information from the situs, but also to provide spatial guidance according to a surgical plan. However, superposition of the two haptic information can lead to overlapping and masking of the feedback and guidance forces. This study investigates different approaches toward a combination of both information and investigates effects on system usability. METHODS: Preliminary studies are conducted to define parameters for two main experiments. The two main experiments constitute simulated surgical interventions where haptic guidance as well as haptic feedback provide information for the surgeon. The first main experiment considers drilling for pedicle screw placements, while the second main experiment refers to three-dimensional milling tasks such as during partial knee replacements or craniectomies. For both experiments, different guidance modes in combination with haptic feedback are evaluated regarding effectiveness (e.g., distance to target depth), efficiency and user satisfaction (e.g., detectability of discrepancies in case of technical guidance error). RESULTS: Regarding pedicle screw placements a combination of a peripheral visual signal and a vibration constitutes a good compromise regarding distance to target depth and detectability of discrepancies. For milling tasks, trajectory guidance is able to improve efficiency and user satisfaction (e.g., perceived workload), while boundary constraints improve effectiveness. If, assistance cannot be offered in all degrees of freedom (e.g., craniectomies), a visual substitution of the haptic force feedback shows the best results, though participants prefer using haptic force feedback. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in case haptic feedback and haptic assistance are combined appropriately, benefits of both haptic modalities can be exploited. Thereby, capabilities of the human–machine system are improved compared to usage of exclusively one of the haptic information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7036061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70360612020-03-06 Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery Schleer, Philipp Kaiser, Philipp Drobinsky, Sergey Radermacher, Klaus Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: A frequently mentioned lack of teleoperated surgical robots is the lack of haptic feedback. Haptics are not only able to mirror force information from the situs, but also to provide spatial guidance according to a surgical plan. However, superposition of the two haptic information can lead to overlapping and masking of the feedback and guidance forces. This study investigates different approaches toward a combination of both information and investigates effects on system usability. METHODS: Preliminary studies are conducted to define parameters for two main experiments. The two main experiments constitute simulated surgical interventions where haptic guidance as well as haptic feedback provide information for the surgeon. The first main experiment considers drilling for pedicle screw placements, while the second main experiment refers to three-dimensional milling tasks such as during partial knee replacements or craniectomies. For both experiments, different guidance modes in combination with haptic feedback are evaluated regarding effectiveness (e.g., distance to target depth), efficiency and user satisfaction (e.g., detectability of discrepancies in case of technical guidance error). RESULTS: Regarding pedicle screw placements a combination of a peripheral visual signal and a vibration constitutes a good compromise regarding distance to target depth and detectability of discrepancies. For milling tasks, trajectory guidance is able to improve efficiency and user satisfaction (e.g., perceived workload), while boundary constraints improve effectiveness. If, assistance cannot be offered in all degrees of freedom (e.g., craniectomies), a visual substitution of the haptic force feedback shows the best results, though participants prefer using haptic force feedback. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in case haptic feedback and haptic assistance are combined appropriately, benefits of both haptic modalities can be exploited. Thereby, capabilities of the human–machine system are improved compared to usage of exclusively one of the haptic information. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7036061/ /pubmed/32002750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02118-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Schleer, Philipp
Kaiser, Philipp
Drobinsky, Sergey
Radermacher, Klaus
Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
title Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
title_full Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
title_fullStr Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
title_short Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
title_sort augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7036061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02118-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schleerphilipp augmentationofhapticfeedbackforteleoperatedroboticsurgery
AT kaiserphilipp augmentationofhapticfeedbackforteleoperatedroboticsurgery
AT drobinskysergey augmentationofhapticfeedbackforteleoperatedroboticsurgery
AT radermacherklaus augmentationofhapticfeedbackforteleoperatedroboticsurgery