Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models

Each year in Europe, meat is associated with 2.3 million foodborne illnesses, with a high contribution from beef meat. Many of these illnesses are attributed to pathogenic bacterial contamination and inadequate operations leading to growth and/or insufficient inactivation occurring along the whole f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tesson, Vincent, Federighi, Michel, Cummins, Enda, de Oliveira Mota, Juliana, Guillou, Sandrine, Boué, Géraldine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31973083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030688
_version_ 1783500476234334208
author Tesson, Vincent
Federighi, Michel
Cummins, Enda
de Oliveira Mota, Juliana
Guillou, Sandrine
Boué, Géraldine
author_facet Tesson, Vincent
Federighi, Michel
Cummins, Enda
de Oliveira Mota, Juliana
Guillou, Sandrine
Boué, Géraldine
author_sort Tesson, Vincent
collection PubMed
description Each year in Europe, meat is associated with 2.3 million foodborne illnesses, with a high contribution from beef meat. Many of these illnesses are attributed to pathogenic bacterial contamination and inadequate operations leading to growth and/or insufficient inactivation occurring along the whole farm-to-fork chain. To ensure consumer health, decision-making processes in food safety rely on Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) with many applications in recent decades. The present study aims to conduct a critical analysis of beef QMRAs and to identify future challenges. A systematic approach, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was used to collate beef QMRA models, identify steps of the farm-to-fork chain considered, and analyze inputs and outputs included as well as modelling methods. A total of 2343 articles were collected and 67 were selected. These studies focused mainly on western countries and considered Escherichia coli (EHEC) and Salmonella spp. pathogens. Future challenges were identified and included the need of whole-chain assessments, centralization of data collection processes, and improvement of model interoperability through harmonization. The present analysis can serve as a source of data and information to inform QMRA framework for beef meat and will help the scientific community and food safety authorities to identify specific monitoring and research needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7037662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70376622020-03-10 A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models Tesson, Vincent Federighi, Michel Cummins, Enda de Oliveira Mota, Juliana Guillou, Sandrine Boué, Géraldine Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Each year in Europe, meat is associated with 2.3 million foodborne illnesses, with a high contribution from beef meat. Many of these illnesses are attributed to pathogenic bacterial contamination and inadequate operations leading to growth and/or insufficient inactivation occurring along the whole farm-to-fork chain. To ensure consumer health, decision-making processes in food safety rely on Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) with many applications in recent decades. The present study aims to conduct a critical analysis of beef QMRAs and to identify future challenges. A systematic approach, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was used to collate beef QMRA models, identify steps of the farm-to-fork chain considered, and analyze inputs and outputs included as well as modelling methods. A total of 2343 articles were collected and 67 were selected. These studies focused mainly on western countries and considered Escherichia coli (EHEC) and Salmonella spp. pathogens. Future challenges were identified and included the need of whole-chain assessments, centralization of data collection processes, and improvement of model interoperability through harmonization. The present analysis can serve as a source of data and information to inform QMRA framework for beef meat and will help the scientific community and food safety authorities to identify specific monitoring and research needs. MDPI 2020-01-21 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7037662/ /pubmed/31973083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030688 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tesson, Vincent
Federighi, Michel
Cummins, Enda
de Oliveira Mota, Juliana
Guillou, Sandrine
Boué, Géraldine
A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
title A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
title_full A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
title_short A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
title_sort systematic review of beef meat quantitative microbial risk assessment models
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7037662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31973083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030688
work_keys_str_mv AT tessonvincent asystematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT federighimichel asystematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT cumminsenda asystematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT deoliveiramotajuliana asystematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT guillousandrine asystematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT bouegeraldine asystematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT tessonvincent systematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT federighimichel systematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT cumminsenda systematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT deoliveiramotajuliana systematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT guillousandrine systematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels
AT bouegeraldine systematicreviewofbeefmeatquantitativemicrobialriskassessmentmodels