Cargando…

Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward

PURPOSE: Interprofessional education (IPE) on a ward supports students to generate interprofessional patient care plans as a means to learn about the roles, responsibilities, and clinical reasoning of other professions. We investigated how clinicians guide the clinical reasoning of students from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, Cora LF, Wouters, Anouk, Croiset, Gerda, Kusurkar, Rashmi A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120520907915
_version_ 1783501091996958720
author Visser, Cora LF
Wouters, Anouk
Croiset, Gerda
Kusurkar, Rashmi A
author_facet Visser, Cora LF
Wouters, Anouk
Croiset, Gerda
Kusurkar, Rashmi A
author_sort Visser, Cora LF
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Interprofessional education (IPE) on a ward supports students to generate interprofessional patient care plans as a means to learn about the roles, responsibilities, and clinical reasoning of other professions. We investigated how clinicians guide the clinical reasoning of students from their own and other professions and whether clinicians from nursing, midwifery, and medicine could scaffold students from all professions, that is, by providing just-in-time and tailored support. METHODS: Nine supervising clinicians from medicine, nursing, and midwifery were interviewed and a repeat interview held 3 to 15 weeks later; one nurse supervisor was interviewed only once. Using conventional content analysis, themes were identified inductively. Next, we applied an existing scaffolding framework to conceptualise how clinicians supported the clinical reasoning in an IPE setting. RESULTS: Themes were clinicians’ interventions and intentions, results of interventions and of IPE, characteristics of students and clinicians, interactions between clinicians and students, and logistics. Clinicians applied various interventions and expressed several intentions to guide the learning of students from all professions. Clinicians stimulated students’ clinical reasoning by structuring meetings, asking students to explain their thoughts to each other and through giving group assignments. Thus, clinicians used peer-assisted learning for the students. By collaborating with other supervising clinicians regarding the form and amount of guidance to give to the students, clinicians applied peer-assisted learning for themselves as well. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can learn to scaffold the clinical reasoning of students from different professions, when they are provided with training, good examples, and structures. An existing scaffolding framework can serve as an overview of aims and interventions to provide just-in-time guidance to students from all professions. The scaffolding framework is useful for training clinicians and for depicting the pedagogical approach for IPE wards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7040925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70409252020-03-04 Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward Visser, Cora LF Wouters, Anouk Croiset, Gerda Kusurkar, Rashmi A J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research PURPOSE: Interprofessional education (IPE) on a ward supports students to generate interprofessional patient care plans as a means to learn about the roles, responsibilities, and clinical reasoning of other professions. We investigated how clinicians guide the clinical reasoning of students from their own and other professions and whether clinicians from nursing, midwifery, and medicine could scaffold students from all professions, that is, by providing just-in-time and tailored support. METHODS: Nine supervising clinicians from medicine, nursing, and midwifery were interviewed and a repeat interview held 3 to 15 weeks later; one nurse supervisor was interviewed only once. Using conventional content analysis, themes were identified inductively. Next, we applied an existing scaffolding framework to conceptualise how clinicians supported the clinical reasoning in an IPE setting. RESULTS: Themes were clinicians’ interventions and intentions, results of interventions and of IPE, characteristics of students and clinicians, interactions between clinicians and students, and logistics. Clinicians applied various interventions and expressed several intentions to guide the learning of students from all professions. Clinicians stimulated students’ clinical reasoning by structuring meetings, asking students to explain their thoughts to each other and through giving group assignments. Thus, clinicians used peer-assisted learning for the students. By collaborating with other supervising clinicians regarding the form and amount of guidance to give to the students, clinicians applied peer-assisted learning for themselves as well. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can learn to scaffold the clinical reasoning of students from different professions, when they are provided with training, good examples, and structures. An existing scaffolding framework can serve as an overview of aims and interventions to provide just-in-time guidance to students from all professions. The scaffolding framework is useful for training clinicians and for depicting the pedagogical approach for IPE wards. SAGE Publications 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7040925/ /pubmed/32133416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120520907915 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Visser, Cora LF
Wouters, Anouk
Croiset, Gerda
Kusurkar, Rashmi A
Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward
title Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward
title_full Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward
title_fullStr Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward
title_full_unstemmed Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward
title_short Scaffolding Clinical Reasoning of Health Care Students: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ Perceptions on an Interprofessional Obstetric Ward
title_sort scaffolding clinical reasoning of health care students: a qualitative exploration of clinicians’ perceptions on an interprofessional obstetric ward
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120520907915
work_keys_str_mv AT vissercoralf scaffoldingclinicalreasoningofhealthcarestudentsaqualitativeexplorationofcliniciansperceptionsonaninterprofessionalobstetricward
AT woutersanouk scaffoldingclinicalreasoningofhealthcarestudentsaqualitativeexplorationofcliniciansperceptionsonaninterprofessionalobstetricward
AT croisetgerda scaffoldingclinicalreasoningofhealthcarestudentsaqualitativeexplorationofcliniciansperceptionsonaninterprofessionalobstetricward
AT kusurkarrashmia scaffoldingclinicalreasoningofhealthcarestudentsaqualitativeexplorationofcliniciansperceptionsonaninterprofessionalobstetricward