Cargando…
Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019 |
_version_ | 1783501339202945024 |
---|---|
author | Forde, Ciarán G Mars, Monica de Graaf, Kees |
author_facet | Forde, Ciarán G Mars, Monica de Graaf, Kees |
author_sort | Forde, Ciarán G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity. A drawback of the NOVA classification is the lack of evidence supporting a causal mechanism for why UPFs lead to overconsumption of energy. In a recent study by Hall the energy intake rate in the UPF condition (48 kcal/min) was >50% higher than in the unprocessed condition (31 kcal/min). Extensive empirical evidence has shown the impact that higher energy density has on increasing ad libitum energy intake and body weight. A significant body of research has shown that consuming foods at higher eating rates is related to higher energy intake and a higher prevalence of obesity. Energy density can be combined with eating rate to create a measure of energy intake rate (kcal/min), providing an index of a food's potential to promote increased energy intake. OBJECTIVE: The current paper compared the association between measured energy intake rate and level of processing as defined by the NOVA classification. METHODS: Data were pooled from 5 published studies that measured energy intake rates across a total sample of 327 foods. RESULTS: We show that going from unprocessed, to processed, to UPFs that the average energy intake rate increases from 35.5 ± 4.4, to 53.7 ± 4.3, to 69.4 ± 3.1 kcal/min (P < 0.05). However, within each processing category there is wide variability in the energy intake rate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that reported relations between UPF consumption and obesity should account for differences in energy intake rates when comparing unprocessed and ultra-processed diets. Future research requires well-controlled human feeding trials to establish the causal mechanisms for why certain UPFs can promote higher energy intake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7042610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70426102020-02-27 Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods Forde, Ciarán G Mars, Monica de Graaf, Kees Curr Dev Nutr Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity. A drawback of the NOVA classification is the lack of evidence supporting a causal mechanism for why UPFs lead to overconsumption of energy. In a recent study by Hall the energy intake rate in the UPF condition (48 kcal/min) was >50% higher than in the unprocessed condition (31 kcal/min). Extensive empirical evidence has shown the impact that higher energy density has on increasing ad libitum energy intake and body weight. A significant body of research has shown that consuming foods at higher eating rates is related to higher energy intake and a higher prevalence of obesity. Energy density can be combined with eating rate to create a measure of energy intake rate (kcal/min), providing an index of a food's potential to promote increased energy intake. OBJECTIVE: The current paper compared the association between measured energy intake rate and level of processing as defined by the NOVA classification. METHODS: Data were pooled from 5 published studies that measured energy intake rates across a total sample of 327 foods. RESULTS: We show that going from unprocessed, to processed, to UPFs that the average energy intake rate increases from 35.5 ± 4.4, to 53.7 ± 4.3, to 69.4 ± 3.1 kcal/min (P < 0.05). However, within each processing category there is wide variability in the energy intake rate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that reported relations between UPF consumption and obesity should account for differences in energy intake rates when comparing unprocessed and ultra-processed diets. Future research requires well-controlled human feeding trials to establish the causal mechanisms for why certain UPFs can promote higher energy intake. Oxford University Press 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7042610/ /pubmed/32110771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019 Text en Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Forde, Ciarán G Mars, Monica de Graaf, Kees Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods |
title | Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods |
title_full | Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods |
title_fullStr | Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods |
title_short | Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods |
title_sort | ultra-processing or oral processing? a role for energy density and eating rate in moderating energy intake from processed foods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fordeciarang ultraprocessingororalprocessingaroleforenergydensityandeatingrateinmoderatingenergyintakefromprocessedfoods AT marsmonica ultraprocessingororalprocessingaroleforenergydensityandeatingrateinmoderatingenergyintakefromprocessedfoods AT degraafkees ultraprocessingororalprocessingaroleforenergydensityandeatingrateinmoderatingenergyintakefromprocessedfoods |