Cargando…

Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods

BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forde, Ciarán G, Mars, Monica, de Graaf, Kees
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019
_version_ 1783501339202945024
author Forde, Ciarán G
Mars, Monica
de Graaf, Kees
author_facet Forde, Ciarán G
Mars, Monica
de Graaf, Kees
author_sort Forde, Ciarán G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity. A drawback of the NOVA classification is the lack of evidence supporting a causal mechanism for why UPFs lead to overconsumption of energy. In a recent study by Hall the energy intake rate in the UPF condition (48 kcal/min) was >50% higher than in the unprocessed condition (31 kcal/min). Extensive empirical evidence has shown the impact that higher energy density has on increasing ad libitum energy intake and body weight. A significant body of research has shown that consuming foods at higher eating rates is related to higher energy intake and a higher prevalence of obesity. Energy density can be combined with eating rate to create a measure of energy intake rate (kcal/min), providing an index of a food's potential to promote increased energy intake. OBJECTIVE: The current paper compared the association between measured energy intake rate and level of processing as defined by the NOVA classification. METHODS: Data were pooled from 5 published studies that measured energy intake rates across a total sample of 327 foods. RESULTS: We show that going from unprocessed, to processed, to UPFs that the average energy intake rate increases from 35.5 ± 4.4, to 53.7 ± 4.3, to 69.4 ± 3.1 kcal/min (P < 0.05). However, within each processing category there is wide variability in the energy intake rate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that reported relations between UPF consumption and obesity should account for differences in energy intake rates when comparing unprocessed and ultra-processed diets. Future research requires well-controlled human feeding trials to establish the causal mechanisms for why certain UPFs can promote higher energy intake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7042610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70426102020-02-27 Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods Forde, Ciarán G Mars, Monica de Graaf, Kees Curr Dev Nutr Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity. A drawback of the NOVA classification is the lack of evidence supporting a causal mechanism for why UPFs lead to overconsumption of energy. In a recent study by Hall the energy intake rate in the UPF condition (48 kcal/min) was >50% higher than in the unprocessed condition (31 kcal/min). Extensive empirical evidence has shown the impact that higher energy density has on increasing ad libitum energy intake and body weight. A significant body of research has shown that consuming foods at higher eating rates is related to higher energy intake and a higher prevalence of obesity. Energy density can be combined with eating rate to create a measure of energy intake rate (kcal/min), providing an index of a food's potential to promote increased energy intake. OBJECTIVE: The current paper compared the association between measured energy intake rate and level of processing as defined by the NOVA classification. METHODS: Data were pooled from 5 published studies that measured energy intake rates across a total sample of 327 foods. RESULTS: We show that going from unprocessed, to processed, to UPFs that the average energy intake rate increases from 35.5 ± 4.4, to 53.7 ± 4.3, to 69.4 ± 3.1 kcal/min (P < 0.05). However, within each processing category there is wide variability in the energy intake rate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that reported relations between UPF consumption and obesity should account for differences in energy intake rates when comparing unprocessed and ultra-processed diets. Future research requires well-controlled human feeding trials to establish the causal mechanisms for why certain UPFs can promote higher energy intake. Oxford University Press 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7042610/ /pubmed/32110771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019 Text en Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Forde, Ciarán G
Mars, Monica
de Graaf, Kees
Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
title Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
title_full Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
title_fullStr Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
title_short Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
title_sort ultra-processing or oral processing? a role for energy density and eating rate in moderating energy intake from processed foods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019
work_keys_str_mv AT fordeciarang ultraprocessingororalprocessingaroleforenergydensityandeatingrateinmoderatingenergyintakefromprocessedfoods
AT marsmonica ultraprocessingororalprocessingaroleforenergydensityandeatingrateinmoderatingenergyintakefromprocessedfoods
AT degraafkees ultraprocessingororalprocessingaroleforenergydensityandeatingrateinmoderatingenergyintakefromprocessedfoods