Cargando…

Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing recognition of the importance of developing learning health systems which can engage all stakeholders in cycles of evidence generation, reflection, action and learning from action to deal with adaptive problems. There is however limited evaluative evidence of approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witter, Sophie, Van Der Merwe, Maria, Twine, Rhian, Mabetha, Denny, Hove, Jennifer, Goosen, Gerhard, D’Ambruoso, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036597
_version_ 1783501720256512000
author Witter, Sophie
Van Der Merwe, Maria
Twine, Rhian
Mabetha, Denny
Hove, Jennifer
Goosen, Gerhard
D’Ambruoso, Lucia
author_facet Witter, Sophie
Van Der Merwe, Maria
Twine, Rhian
Mabetha, Denny
Hove, Jennifer
Goosen, Gerhard
D’Ambruoso, Lucia
author_sort Witter, Sophie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is a growing recognition of the importance of developing learning health systems which can engage all stakeholders in cycles of evidence generation, reflection, action and learning from action to deal with adaptive problems. There is however limited evaluative evidence of approaches to developing or strengthening such systems, particularly in low-income and middle-income settings. In this protocol, we aim to contribute to developing and sharing knowledge on models of building collaborative learning platforms through our evaluation of the Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation takes a participatory approach, focussed on joint learning on whether and how VAPAR contributes to its aims, and what can be learnt for this and similar settings. A realist-informed theory of change was developed by the research team as part of a broader collaboration with other stakeholders. The evaluation will draw on a wide variety of perspectives and data, including programme data and secondary data. This will be supplemented by in-depth interviews and workshops at the end of each cycle to probe the different domains, understand changes to the positions of different actors within the local health system and feedback into improved learning and action in the next cycle. Quantitative data such as verbal autopsy will be analysed for significant trends in health indicators for different population groups. However, the bulk of the data will be qualitative and will be analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics in participatory approaches include a careful focus on the power relationships within the group, such that all groups are given voice and influence, in addition to the usual considerations of informed participation. Within the programme, we will focus on reflexivity, relationship building, two-way learning and learning from failure to reduce power imbalances and mitigate against a blame culture. Local engagement and change will be prioritised in dissemination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70451522020-03-09 Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation Witter, Sophie Van Der Merwe, Maria Twine, Rhian Mabetha, Denny Hove, Jennifer Goosen, Gerhard D’Ambruoso, Lucia BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: There is a growing recognition of the importance of developing learning health systems which can engage all stakeholders in cycles of evidence generation, reflection, action and learning from action to deal with adaptive problems. There is however limited evaluative evidence of approaches to developing or strengthening such systems, particularly in low-income and middle-income settings. In this protocol, we aim to contribute to developing and sharing knowledge on models of building collaborative learning platforms through our evaluation of the Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation takes a participatory approach, focussed on joint learning on whether and how VAPAR contributes to its aims, and what can be learnt for this and similar settings. A realist-informed theory of change was developed by the research team as part of a broader collaboration with other stakeholders. The evaluation will draw on a wide variety of perspectives and data, including programme data and secondary data. This will be supplemented by in-depth interviews and workshops at the end of each cycle to probe the different domains, understand changes to the positions of different actors within the local health system and feedback into improved learning and action in the next cycle. Quantitative data such as verbal autopsy will be analysed for significant trends in health indicators for different population groups. However, the bulk of the data will be qualitative and will be analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics in participatory approaches include a careful focus on the power relationships within the group, such that all groups are given voice and influence, in addition to the usual considerations of informed participation. Within the programme, we will focus on reflexivity, relationship building, two-way learning and learning from failure to reduce power imbalances and mitigate against a blame culture. Local engagement and change will be prioritised in dissemination. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7045152/ /pubmed/32024794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036597 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Witter, Sophie
Van Der Merwe, Maria
Twine, Rhian
Mabetha, Denny
Hove, Jennifer
Goosen, Gerhard
D’Ambruoso, Lucia
Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
title Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
title_full Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
title_fullStr Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
title_short Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
title_sort verbal autopsy with participatory action research (vapar) programme in mpumalanga, south africa: protocol for evaluation
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036597
work_keys_str_mv AT wittersophie verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation
AT vandermerwemaria verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation
AT twinerhian verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation
AT mabethadenny verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation
AT hovejennifer verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation
AT goosengerhard verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation
AT dambruosolucia verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation