Cargando…
Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing recognition of the importance of developing learning health systems which can engage all stakeholders in cycles of evidence generation, reflection, action and learning from action to deal with adaptive problems. There is however limited evaluative evidence of approac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036597 |
_version_ | 1783501720256512000 |
---|---|
author | Witter, Sophie Van Der Merwe, Maria Twine, Rhian Mabetha, Denny Hove, Jennifer Goosen, Gerhard D’Ambruoso, Lucia |
author_facet | Witter, Sophie Van Der Merwe, Maria Twine, Rhian Mabetha, Denny Hove, Jennifer Goosen, Gerhard D’Ambruoso, Lucia |
author_sort | Witter, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is a growing recognition of the importance of developing learning health systems which can engage all stakeholders in cycles of evidence generation, reflection, action and learning from action to deal with adaptive problems. There is however limited evaluative evidence of approaches to developing or strengthening such systems, particularly in low-income and middle-income settings. In this protocol, we aim to contribute to developing and sharing knowledge on models of building collaborative learning platforms through our evaluation of the Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation takes a participatory approach, focussed on joint learning on whether and how VAPAR contributes to its aims, and what can be learnt for this and similar settings. A realist-informed theory of change was developed by the research team as part of a broader collaboration with other stakeholders. The evaluation will draw on a wide variety of perspectives and data, including programme data and secondary data. This will be supplemented by in-depth interviews and workshops at the end of each cycle to probe the different domains, understand changes to the positions of different actors within the local health system and feedback into improved learning and action in the next cycle. Quantitative data such as verbal autopsy will be analysed for significant trends in health indicators for different population groups. However, the bulk of the data will be qualitative and will be analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics in participatory approaches include a careful focus on the power relationships within the group, such that all groups are given voice and influence, in addition to the usual considerations of informed participation. Within the programme, we will focus on reflexivity, relationship building, two-way learning and learning from failure to reduce power imbalances and mitigate against a blame culture. Local engagement and change will be prioritised in dissemination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70451522020-03-09 Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation Witter, Sophie Van Der Merwe, Maria Twine, Rhian Mabetha, Denny Hove, Jennifer Goosen, Gerhard D’Ambruoso, Lucia BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: There is a growing recognition of the importance of developing learning health systems which can engage all stakeholders in cycles of evidence generation, reflection, action and learning from action to deal with adaptive problems. There is however limited evaluative evidence of approaches to developing or strengthening such systems, particularly in low-income and middle-income settings. In this protocol, we aim to contribute to developing and sharing knowledge on models of building collaborative learning platforms through our evaluation of the Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation takes a participatory approach, focussed on joint learning on whether and how VAPAR contributes to its aims, and what can be learnt for this and similar settings. A realist-informed theory of change was developed by the research team as part of a broader collaboration with other stakeholders. The evaluation will draw on a wide variety of perspectives and data, including programme data and secondary data. This will be supplemented by in-depth interviews and workshops at the end of each cycle to probe the different domains, understand changes to the positions of different actors within the local health system and feedback into improved learning and action in the next cycle. Quantitative data such as verbal autopsy will be analysed for significant trends in health indicators for different population groups. However, the bulk of the data will be qualitative and will be analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics in participatory approaches include a careful focus on the power relationships within the group, such that all groups are given voice and influence, in addition to the usual considerations of informed participation. Within the programme, we will focus on reflexivity, relationship building, two-way learning and learning from failure to reduce power imbalances and mitigate against a blame culture. Local engagement and change will be prioritised in dissemination. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7045152/ /pubmed/32024794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036597 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Witter, Sophie Van Der Merwe, Maria Twine, Rhian Mabetha, Denny Hove, Jennifer Goosen, Gerhard D’Ambruoso, Lucia Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation |
title | Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation |
title_full | Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation |
title_fullStr | Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation |
title_short | Verbal Autopsy with Participatory Action Research (VAPAR) programme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: protocol for evaluation |
title_sort | verbal autopsy with participatory action research (vapar) programme in mpumalanga, south africa: protocol for evaluation |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32024794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittersophie verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation AT vandermerwemaria verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation AT twinerhian verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation AT mabethadenny verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation AT hovejennifer verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation AT goosengerhard verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation AT dambruosolucia verbalautopsywithparticipatoryactionresearchvaparprogrammeinmpumalangasouthafricaprotocolforevaluation |