Cargando…

Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?

BACKGROUND: In youth, sex-related differences in balance performances have been reported with girls usually outperforming same-aged boys. However, it is not known whether sex also has an influence on learning of a new balance task in primary school-aged children. Therefore, the present study investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schedler, Simon, Brueckner, Dennis, Kiss, Rainer, Muehlbauer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00166-z
_version_ 1783504098609332224
author Schedler, Simon
Brueckner, Dennis
Kiss, Rainer
Muehlbauer, Thomas
author_facet Schedler, Simon
Brueckner, Dennis
Kiss, Rainer
Muehlbauer, Thomas
author_sort Schedler, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In youth, sex-related differences in balance performances have been reported with girls usually outperforming same-aged boys. However, it is not known whether sex also has an influence on learning of a new balance task in primary school-aged children. Therefore, the present study investigated sex-related differences in children learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions. METHODS: Thirty-two children (16 girls, 16 boys) aged 8.5 ± 0.5 years practiced balancing on a stabilometer (i.e., to keep it as horizontal as possible) for seven trials (90 s each) on two consecutive days. Knowledge of results (KR) (i.e., time in balance) was provided after each trial. On day three learning was assessed using a retention test (i.e., balance task only) and a test of automation (i.e., balance plus concurrent motor interference task). Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) was recorded for all trials and used for further analysis. RESULTS: During practicing (Day 1, Day 2) RMSE values significantly decreased over the days (p = 0.019, d = 0.92) and trials (p = 0.003, d = 0.70) in boys and girls. Further, the main effect of sex showed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.082, d = 0.67). On day 3, the girls showed significantly smaller RMSE values compared to boys in the retention (p = 0.012, d = 1.00) and transfer test (p = 0.045, d = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance increases during the acquisition phase tended to be larger in girls than in boys. Further, learning (i.e., retention and automation) was significantly larger in girls compared to boys. Therefore, practitioners (e.g., teachers, coaches) should supply boys and grils with balance exercises of various task difficulties and complexities to address their diverse learning progress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7059683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70596832020-03-12 Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? Schedler, Simon Brueckner, Dennis Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: In youth, sex-related differences in balance performances have been reported with girls usually outperforming same-aged boys. However, it is not known whether sex also has an influence on learning of a new balance task in primary school-aged children. Therefore, the present study investigated sex-related differences in children learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions. METHODS: Thirty-two children (16 girls, 16 boys) aged 8.5 ± 0.5 years practiced balancing on a stabilometer (i.e., to keep it as horizontal as possible) for seven trials (90 s each) on two consecutive days. Knowledge of results (KR) (i.e., time in balance) was provided after each trial. On day three learning was assessed using a retention test (i.e., balance task only) and a test of automation (i.e., balance plus concurrent motor interference task). Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) was recorded for all trials and used for further analysis. RESULTS: During practicing (Day 1, Day 2) RMSE values significantly decreased over the days (p = 0.019, d = 0.92) and trials (p = 0.003, d = 0.70) in boys and girls. Further, the main effect of sex showed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.082, d = 0.67). On day 3, the girls showed significantly smaller RMSE values compared to boys in the retention (p = 0.012, d = 1.00) and transfer test (p = 0.045, d = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance increases during the acquisition phase tended to be larger in girls than in boys. Further, learning (i.e., retention and automation) was significantly larger in girls compared to boys. Therefore, practitioners (e.g., teachers, coaches) should supply boys and grils with balance exercises of various task difficulties and complexities to address their diverse learning progress. BioMed Central 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7059683/ /pubmed/32166038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00166-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schedler, Simon
Brueckner, Dennis
Kiss, Rainer
Muehlbauer, Thomas
Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
title Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
title_full Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
title_fullStr Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
title_full_unstemmed Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
title_short Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
title_sort effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00166-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schedlersimon effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences
AT bruecknerdennis effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences
AT kissrainer effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences
AT muehlbauerthomas effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences