Cargando…
Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences?
BACKGROUND: In youth, sex-related differences in balance performances have been reported with girls usually outperforming same-aged boys. However, it is not known whether sex also has an influence on learning of a new balance task in primary school-aged children. Therefore, the present study investi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00166-z |
_version_ | 1783504098609332224 |
---|---|
author | Schedler, Simon Brueckner, Dennis Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas |
author_facet | Schedler, Simon Brueckner, Dennis Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas |
author_sort | Schedler, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In youth, sex-related differences in balance performances have been reported with girls usually outperforming same-aged boys. However, it is not known whether sex also has an influence on learning of a new balance task in primary school-aged children. Therefore, the present study investigated sex-related differences in children learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions. METHODS: Thirty-two children (16 girls, 16 boys) aged 8.5 ± 0.5 years practiced balancing on a stabilometer (i.e., to keep it as horizontal as possible) for seven trials (90 s each) on two consecutive days. Knowledge of results (KR) (i.e., time in balance) was provided after each trial. On day three learning was assessed using a retention test (i.e., balance task only) and a test of automation (i.e., balance plus concurrent motor interference task). Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) was recorded for all trials and used for further analysis. RESULTS: During practicing (Day 1, Day 2) RMSE values significantly decreased over the days (p = 0.019, d = 0.92) and trials (p = 0.003, d = 0.70) in boys and girls. Further, the main effect of sex showed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.082, d = 0.67). On day 3, the girls showed significantly smaller RMSE values compared to boys in the retention (p = 0.012, d = 1.00) and transfer test (p = 0.045, d = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance increases during the acquisition phase tended to be larger in girls than in boys. Further, learning (i.e., retention and automation) was significantly larger in girls compared to boys. Therefore, practitioners (e.g., teachers, coaches) should supply boys and grils with balance exercises of various task difficulties and complexities to address their diverse learning progress. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7059683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70596832020-03-12 Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? Schedler, Simon Brueckner, Dennis Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: In youth, sex-related differences in balance performances have been reported with girls usually outperforming same-aged boys. However, it is not known whether sex also has an influence on learning of a new balance task in primary school-aged children. Therefore, the present study investigated sex-related differences in children learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions. METHODS: Thirty-two children (16 girls, 16 boys) aged 8.5 ± 0.5 years practiced balancing on a stabilometer (i.e., to keep it as horizontal as possible) for seven trials (90 s each) on two consecutive days. Knowledge of results (KR) (i.e., time in balance) was provided after each trial. On day three learning was assessed using a retention test (i.e., balance task only) and a test of automation (i.e., balance plus concurrent motor interference task). Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) was recorded for all trials and used for further analysis. RESULTS: During practicing (Day 1, Day 2) RMSE values significantly decreased over the days (p = 0.019, d = 0.92) and trials (p = 0.003, d = 0.70) in boys and girls. Further, the main effect of sex showed a tendency toward significance (p = 0.082, d = 0.67). On day 3, the girls showed significantly smaller RMSE values compared to boys in the retention (p = 0.012, d = 1.00) and transfer test (p = 0.045, d = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance increases during the acquisition phase tended to be larger in girls than in boys. Further, learning (i.e., retention and automation) was significantly larger in girls compared to boys. Therefore, practitioners (e.g., teachers, coaches) should supply boys and grils with balance exercises of various task difficulties and complexities to address their diverse learning progress. BioMed Central 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7059683/ /pubmed/32166038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00166-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schedler, Simon Brueckner, Dennis Kiss, Rainer Muehlbauer, Thomas Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
title | Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
title_full | Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
title_fullStr | Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
title_short | Effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
title_sort | effect of practice on learning to maintain balance under dynamic conditions in children: are there sex differences? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00166-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schedlersimon effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences AT bruecknerdennis effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences AT kissrainer effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences AT muehlbauerthomas effectofpracticeonlearningtomaintainbalanceunderdynamicconditionsinchildrenaretheresexdifferences |