Cargando…
Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact
INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning has been fostered with varying case formats including the use of virtual patients. Existing literature points to different conclusions regarding which format is most beneficial for learners with diverse levels of prior knowledge. We designed our study to better under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7071577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y |
_version_ | 1783506233370607616 |
---|---|
author | Kiesewetter, Jan Sailer, Michael Jung, Valentina M. Schönberger, Regina Bauer, Elisabeth Zottmann, Jan M. Hege, Inga Zimmermann, Hanna Fischer, Frank Fischer, Martin R. |
author_facet | Kiesewetter, Jan Sailer, Michael Jung, Valentina M. Schönberger, Regina Bauer, Elisabeth Zottmann, Jan M. Hege, Inga Zimmermann, Hanna Fischer, Frank Fischer, Martin R. |
author_sort | Kiesewetter, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning has been fostered with varying case formats including the use of virtual patients. Existing literature points to different conclusions regarding which format is most beneficial for learners with diverse levels of prior knowledge. We designed our study to better understand which case format affects clinical reasoning outcomes and cognitive load, dependent on medical students’ prior knowledge. METHODS: Overall, 142 medical students (3 rd to 6 th year) were randomly assigned to either a whole case or serial cue case format. Participants worked on eight virtual patients in their respective case format. Outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, knowledge, and cognitive load. RESULTS: We found no effect of case format on strategic knowledge scores pre- vs post-test (whole case learning gain = 3, 95% CI. -.01 to .01, serial cue learning gain = 3, 95% CI. -.06 to .00 p = .50). In both case formats, students with high baseline knowledge (determined by median split on the pre-test in conceptual knowledge) benefitted from learning with virtual patients (learning gain in strategic knowledge = 5, 95% CI .03 to .09, p = .01) while students with low prior knowledge did not (learning gain = 0, 95%CI −.02 to .02). We found no difference in diagnostic accuracy between experimental conditions (difference = .44, 95% CI −.96 to .08, p = .22), but diagnostic accuracy was higher for students with high prior knowledge compared to those with low prior knowledge (difference = .8, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.35, p < .01). Students with low prior knowledge experienced higher extraneous cognitive load than students with high prior knowledge (multiple measurements, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The whole case and serial cue case formats alone did not affect students’ knowledge gain or diagnostic accuracy. Students with lower knowledge experienced increased cognitive load and appear to have learned less from their interaction with virtual patients. Cognitive load should be taken into account when attempting to help students learn clinical reasoning with virtual patients, especially for students with lower knowledge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7071577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70715772020-03-18 Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact Kiesewetter, Jan Sailer, Michael Jung, Valentina M. Schönberger, Regina Bauer, Elisabeth Zottmann, Jan M. Hege, Inga Zimmermann, Hanna Fischer, Frank Fischer, Martin R. BMC Med Educ Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning has been fostered with varying case formats including the use of virtual patients. Existing literature points to different conclusions regarding which format is most beneficial for learners with diverse levels of prior knowledge. We designed our study to better understand which case format affects clinical reasoning outcomes and cognitive load, dependent on medical students’ prior knowledge. METHODS: Overall, 142 medical students (3 rd to 6 th year) were randomly assigned to either a whole case or serial cue case format. Participants worked on eight virtual patients in their respective case format. Outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, knowledge, and cognitive load. RESULTS: We found no effect of case format on strategic knowledge scores pre- vs post-test (whole case learning gain = 3, 95% CI. -.01 to .01, serial cue learning gain = 3, 95% CI. -.06 to .00 p = .50). In both case formats, students with high baseline knowledge (determined by median split on the pre-test in conceptual knowledge) benefitted from learning with virtual patients (learning gain in strategic knowledge = 5, 95% CI .03 to .09, p = .01) while students with low prior knowledge did not (learning gain = 0, 95%CI −.02 to .02). We found no difference in diagnostic accuracy between experimental conditions (difference = .44, 95% CI −.96 to .08, p = .22), but diagnostic accuracy was higher for students with high prior knowledge compared to those with low prior knowledge (difference = .8, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.35, p < .01). Students with low prior knowledge experienced higher extraneous cognitive load than students with high prior knowledge (multiple measurements, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The whole case and serial cue case formats alone did not affect students’ knowledge gain or diagnostic accuracy. Students with lower knowledge experienced increased cognitive load and appear to have learned less from their interaction with virtual patients. Cognitive load should be taken into account when attempting to help students learn clinical reasoning with virtual patients, especially for students with lower knowledge. BioMed Central 2020-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7071577/ /pubmed/32171297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kiesewetter, Jan Sailer, Michael Jung, Valentina M. Schönberger, Regina Bauer, Elisabeth Zottmann, Jan M. Hege, Inga Zimmermann, Hanna Fischer, Frank Fischer, Martin R. Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
title | Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
title_full | Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
title_fullStr | Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
title_short | Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
title_sort | learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7071577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiesewetterjan learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT sailermichael learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT jungvalentinam learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT schonbergerregina learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT bauerelisabeth learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT zottmannjanm learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT hegeinga learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT zimmermannhanna learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT fischerfrank learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract AT fischermartinr learningclinicalreasoninghowvirtualpatientcaseformatandpriorknowledgeinteract |