Cargando…
Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of sele...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12020193 |
_version_ | 1783507397971542016 |
---|---|
author | Grigonyte, Aurelija M. Harrison, Christian MacDonald, Paul R. Montero-Blay, Ariadna Tridgett, Matthew Duncan, John Sagona, Antonia P. Constantinidou, Chrystala Jaramillo, Alfonso Millard, Andrew |
author_facet | Grigonyte, Aurelija M. Harrison, Christian MacDonald, Paul R. Montero-Blay, Ariadna Tridgett, Matthew Duncan, John Sagona, Antonia P. Constantinidou, Chrystala Jaramillo, Alfonso Millard, Andrew |
author_sort | Grigonyte, Aurelija M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of selection to identify recombinant phages. For bacteriophage T7, the host genes cmk or trxA have been used as a selection mechanism along with both type I and II CRISPR systems to select against wild-type phage and enrich for the desired mutant. Here, we systematically compare all three systems; we show that the use of marker-based selection is the most efficient method and we use this to generate multiple T7 tail fibre mutants. Furthermore, we found the type II CRISPR-Cas system is easier to use and generally more efficient than a type I system in the engineering of phage T7. These results provide a foundation for the future, more efficient engineering of bacteriophage T7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7077284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70772842020-03-20 Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 Grigonyte, Aurelija M. Harrison, Christian MacDonald, Paul R. Montero-Blay, Ariadna Tridgett, Matthew Duncan, John Sagona, Antonia P. Constantinidou, Chrystala Jaramillo, Alfonso Millard, Andrew Viruses Article With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of selection to identify recombinant phages. For bacteriophage T7, the host genes cmk or trxA have been used as a selection mechanism along with both type I and II CRISPR systems to select against wild-type phage and enrich for the desired mutant. Here, we systematically compare all three systems; we show that the use of marker-based selection is the most efficient method and we use this to generate multiple T7 tail fibre mutants. Furthermore, we found the type II CRISPR-Cas system is easier to use and generally more efficient than a type I system in the engineering of phage T7. These results provide a foundation for the future, more efficient engineering of bacteriophage T7. MDPI 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7077284/ /pubmed/32050613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12020193 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grigonyte, Aurelija M. Harrison, Christian MacDonald, Paul R. Montero-Blay, Ariadna Tridgett, Matthew Duncan, John Sagona, Antonia P. Constantinidou, Chrystala Jaramillo, Alfonso Millard, Andrew Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 |
title | Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 |
title_full | Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 |
title_short | Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 |
title_sort | comparison of crispr and marker-based methods for the engineering of phage t7 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12020193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grigonyteaurelijam comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT harrisonchristian comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT macdonaldpaulr comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT monteroblayariadna comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT tridgettmatthew comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT duncanjohn comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT sagonaantoniap comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT constantinidouchrystala comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT jaramilloalfonso comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 AT millardandrew comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7 |