Cargando…

Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7

With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of sele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grigonyte, Aurelija M., Harrison, Christian, MacDonald, Paul R., Montero-Blay, Ariadna, Tridgett, Matthew, Duncan, John, Sagona, Antonia P., Constantinidou, Chrystala, Jaramillo, Alfonso, Millard, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12020193
_version_ 1783507397971542016
author Grigonyte, Aurelija M.
Harrison, Christian
MacDonald, Paul R.
Montero-Blay, Ariadna
Tridgett, Matthew
Duncan, John
Sagona, Antonia P.
Constantinidou, Chrystala
Jaramillo, Alfonso
Millard, Andrew
author_facet Grigonyte, Aurelija M.
Harrison, Christian
MacDonald, Paul R.
Montero-Blay, Ariadna
Tridgett, Matthew
Duncan, John
Sagona, Antonia P.
Constantinidou, Chrystala
Jaramillo, Alfonso
Millard, Andrew
author_sort Grigonyte, Aurelija M.
collection PubMed
description With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of selection to identify recombinant phages. For bacteriophage T7, the host genes cmk or trxA have been used as a selection mechanism along with both type I and II CRISPR systems to select against wild-type phage and enrich for the desired mutant. Here, we systematically compare all three systems; we show that the use of marker-based selection is the most efficient method and we use this to generate multiple T7 tail fibre mutants. Furthermore, we found the type II CRISPR-Cas system is easier to use and generally more efficient than a type I system in the engineering of phage T7. These results provide a foundation for the future, more efficient engineering of bacteriophage T7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7077284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70772842020-03-20 Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7 Grigonyte, Aurelija M. Harrison, Christian MacDonald, Paul R. Montero-Blay, Ariadna Tridgett, Matthew Duncan, John Sagona, Antonia P. Constantinidou, Chrystala Jaramillo, Alfonso Millard, Andrew Viruses Article With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of selection to identify recombinant phages. For bacteriophage T7, the host genes cmk or trxA have been used as a selection mechanism along with both type I and II CRISPR systems to select against wild-type phage and enrich for the desired mutant. Here, we systematically compare all three systems; we show that the use of marker-based selection is the most efficient method and we use this to generate multiple T7 tail fibre mutants. Furthermore, we found the type II CRISPR-Cas system is easier to use and generally more efficient than a type I system in the engineering of phage T7. These results provide a foundation for the future, more efficient engineering of bacteriophage T7. MDPI 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7077284/ /pubmed/32050613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12020193 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grigonyte, Aurelija M.
Harrison, Christian
MacDonald, Paul R.
Montero-Blay, Ariadna
Tridgett, Matthew
Duncan, John
Sagona, Antonia P.
Constantinidou, Chrystala
Jaramillo, Alfonso
Millard, Andrew
Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
title Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
title_full Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
title_fullStr Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
title_short Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
title_sort comparison of crispr and marker-based methods for the engineering of phage t7
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12020193
work_keys_str_mv AT grigonyteaurelijam comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT harrisonchristian comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT macdonaldpaulr comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT monteroblayariadna comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT tridgettmatthew comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT duncanjohn comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT sagonaantoniap comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT constantinidouchrystala comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT jaramilloalfonso comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7
AT millardandrew comparisonofcrisprandmarkerbasedmethodsfortheengineeringofphaget7