Cargando…

Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm

Learning from errors or negative feedback is crucial for adaptive behavior. FMRI studies have demonstrated enhanced anterior cingulate cortex activity for errors that were later corrected versus repeated errors even when a substantial delay between the error and the opportunity to correct was introd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bruijn, Ellen R. A., Mars, Rogier B., Hester, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14566
_version_ 1783507773385867264
author de Bruijn, Ellen R. A.
Mars, Rogier B.
Hester, Rob
author_facet de Bruijn, Ellen R. A.
Mars, Rogier B.
Hester, Rob
author_sort de Bruijn, Ellen R. A.
collection PubMed
description Learning from errors or negative feedback is crucial for adaptive behavior. FMRI studies have demonstrated enhanced anterior cingulate cortex activity for errors that were later corrected versus repeated errors even when a substantial delay between the error and the opportunity to correct was introduced. We aimed at identifying the electrophysiological correlates of these processes by investigating the feedback‐related negativity (FRN) and stimulus‐locked P3. Participants had to learn and recall the location of 2‐digit targets over consecutive rounds. Feedback was provided in two steps, first a color change indicated a correct or incorrect response (feedback phase) followed by presentation of the correct digit information (re‐encoding phase). Behaviorally, participants improved performance from the first to the third round. FRN amplitudes time‐locked to feedback were enhanced for corrected compared to repeated errors. The P3 in response to re‐encoding did not differ between the two error types. The finding that FRN amplitudes positively predicted memory performance is consistent with the idea that the FRN reflects prediction errors and the need for enhanced cognitive control. Interestingly, this happens early during feedback processing and not at a later time point when re‐encoding of correct information takes place. The prediction error signal reflected in the FRN is usually elicited by performance errors, but may thus also play a role in preparing/optimizing the system for memory formation. This supports the existence of a close link between action control and memory processes even when there is a substantial delay between error feedback and the opportunity to correct the error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70791582020-03-19 Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm de Bruijn, Ellen R. A. Mars, Rogier B. Hester, Rob Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience Learning from errors or negative feedback is crucial for adaptive behavior. FMRI studies have demonstrated enhanced anterior cingulate cortex activity for errors that were later corrected versus repeated errors even when a substantial delay between the error and the opportunity to correct was introduced. We aimed at identifying the electrophysiological correlates of these processes by investigating the feedback‐related negativity (FRN) and stimulus‐locked P3. Participants had to learn and recall the location of 2‐digit targets over consecutive rounds. Feedback was provided in two steps, first a color change indicated a correct or incorrect response (feedback phase) followed by presentation of the correct digit information (re‐encoding phase). Behaviorally, participants improved performance from the first to the third round. FRN amplitudes time‐locked to feedback were enhanced for corrected compared to repeated errors. The P3 in response to re‐encoding did not differ between the two error types. The finding that FRN amplitudes positively predicted memory performance is consistent with the idea that the FRN reflects prediction errors and the need for enhanced cognitive control. Interestingly, this happens early during feedback processing and not at a later time point when re‐encoding of correct information takes place. The prediction error signal reflected in the FRN is usually elicited by performance errors, but may thus also play a role in preparing/optimizing the system for memory formation. This supports the existence of a close link between action control and memory processes even when there is a substantial delay between error feedback and the opportunity to correct the error. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-03 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7079158/ /pubmed/31494976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14566 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cognitive Neuroscience
de Bruijn, Ellen R. A.
Mars, Rogier B.
Hester, Rob
Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
title Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
title_full Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
title_fullStr Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
title_short Processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: Enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
title_sort processing of performance errors predicts memory formation: enhanced feedback‐related negativities for corrected versus repeated errors in an associative learning paradigm
topic Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14566
work_keys_str_mv AT debruijnellenra processingofperformanceerrorspredictsmemoryformationenhancedfeedbackrelatednegativitiesforcorrectedversusrepeatederrorsinanassociativelearningparadigm
AT marsrogierb processingofperformanceerrorspredictsmemoryformationenhancedfeedbackrelatednegativitiesforcorrectedversusrepeatederrorsinanassociativelearningparadigm
AT hesterrob processingofperformanceerrorspredictsmemoryformationenhancedfeedbackrelatednegativitiesforcorrectedversusrepeatederrorsinanassociativelearningparadigm