Cargando…
I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA
Stress negatively affects the well-being and the quality of life of the society. Specifically in the academic context, it is relevant to analyze its levels due to its impact on performance and learning. There are factors that affect the said stress including, among others, self-efficacy, and emotion...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00295 |
_version_ | 1783508346026852352 |
---|---|
author | Navarro-Mateu, Diego Alonso-Larza, Lucía Gómez-Domínguez, María Teresa Prado-Gascó, Vicente Valero-Moreno, Selene |
author_facet | Navarro-Mateu, Diego Alonso-Larza, Lucía Gómez-Domínguez, María Teresa Prado-Gascó, Vicente Valero-Moreno, Selene |
author_sort | Navarro-Mateu, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stress negatively affects the well-being and the quality of life of the society. Specifically in the academic context, it is relevant to analyze its levels due to its impact on performance and learning. There are factors that affect the said stress including, among others, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence. The purpose of this study is to analyze how emotional intelligence and perceived self-efficacy affect student stress. In order to show this influence, two complementary methodologies are implemented: the structural equation models (SEMs) and the comparative qualitative analysis (QCA). A total of 477 students (85% of women) from a private University of Valencia participated in the study, with ages ranging from 18 to 53 years old (M = 21.57, SD = 3.68). The assessment instruments used were as follows: Emotional Intelligence Scale (TMMS-24) to measure emotional intelligence; General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSS) to measure self-efficacy; and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to measure stress. The results in the SEM endorse the hypotheses that emotional clarity and self-efficacy are negatively related to stress and positively related to emotional attention (EA), explaining 25% of the variance. The QCA results show that none of the variables is a necessary condition for inducing stress. Nevertheless, different combinations of these variables are sufficient conditions to explain 35% of the high stress levels. The most important combination over high stress levels seems to be the interaction between high levels of EA and low levels of self-efficacy. Regarding the low levels of perceived stress, there are sufficient conditions to explain 50% of them. Mainly, the most important interaction is between low levels of self-efficacy and low levels of EA. The comparison of both methodologies enables the broadening of new horizons at the methodological level applicable to different contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7082421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70824212020-03-30 I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA Navarro-Mateu, Diego Alonso-Larza, Lucía Gómez-Domínguez, María Teresa Prado-Gascó, Vicente Valero-Moreno, Selene Front Psychol Psychology Stress negatively affects the well-being and the quality of life of the society. Specifically in the academic context, it is relevant to analyze its levels due to its impact on performance and learning. There are factors that affect the said stress including, among others, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence. The purpose of this study is to analyze how emotional intelligence and perceived self-efficacy affect student stress. In order to show this influence, two complementary methodologies are implemented: the structural equation models (SEMs) and the comparative qualitative analysis (QCA). A total of 477 students (85% of women) from a private University of Valencia participated in the study, with ages ranging from 18 to 53 years old (M = 21.57, SD = 3.68). The assessment instruments used were as follows: Emotional Intelligence Scale (TMMS-24) to measure emotional intelligence; General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSS) to measure self-efficacy; and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to measure stress. The results in the SEM endorse the hypotheses that emotional clarity and self-efficacy are negatively related to stress and positively related to emotional attention (EA), explaining 25% of the variance. The QCA results show that none of the variables is a necessary condition for inducing stress. Nevertheless, different combinations of these variables are sufficient conditions to explain 35% of the high stress levels. The most important combination over high stress levels seems to be the interaction between high levels of EA and low levels of self-efficacy. Regarding the low levels of perceived stress, there are sufficient conditions to explain 50% of them. Mainly, the most important interaction is between low levels of self-efficacy and low levels of EA. The comparison of both methodologies enables the broadening of new horizons at the methodological level applicable to different contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7082421/ /pubmed/32231608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00295 Text en Copyright © 2020 Navarro-Mateu, Alonso-Larza, Gómez-Domínguez, Prado-Gascó and Valero-Moreno. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Navarro-Mateu, Diego Alonso-Larza, Lucía Gómez-Domínguez, María Teresa Prado-Gascó, Vicente Valero-Moreno, Selene I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA |
title | I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA |
title_full | I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA |
title_fullStr | I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA |
title_full_unstemmed | I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA |
title_short | I’m Not Good for Anything and That’s Why I’m Stressed: Analysis of the Effect of Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence on Student Stress Using SEM and QCA |
title_sort | i’m not good for anything and that’s why i’m stressed: analysis of the effect of self-efficacy and emotional intelligence on student stress using sem and qca |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT navarromateudiego imnotgoodforanythingandthatswhyimstressedanalysisoftheeffectofselfefficacyandemotionalintelligenceonstudentstressusingsemandqca AT alonsolarzalucia imnotgoodforanythingandthatswhyimstressedanalysisoftheeffectofselfefficacyandemotionalintelligenceonstudentstressusingsemandqca AT gomezdominguezmariateresa imnotgoodforanythingandthatswhyimstressedanalysisoftheeffectofselfefficacyandemotionalintelligenceonstudentstressusingsemandqca AT pradogascovicente imnotgoodforanythingandthatswhyimstressedanalysisoftheeffectofselfefficacyandemotionalintelligenceonstudentstressusingsemandqca AT valeromorenoselene imnotgoodforanythingandthatswhyimstressedanalysisoftheeffectofselfefficacyandemotionalintelligenceonstudentstressusingsemandqca |