Cargando…

The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language

We describe research on the validity of a new theoretical framework and scoring methodology, called STAGES, for sentence completion tests of meaning-making maturity or complexity (also called ego development or perspective-taking capacity). STAGES builds upon research on the substantially validated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Fallon, Terri, Polissar, Nayak, Neradilek, Moni Blazej, Murray, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03472
_version_ 1783509915083472896
author O'Fallon, Terri
Polissar, Nayak
Neradilek, Moni Blazej
Murray, Tom
author_facet O'Fallon, Terri
Polissar, Nayak
Neradilek, Moni Blazej
Murray, Tom
author_sort O'Fallon, Terri
collection PubMed
description We describe research on the validity of a new theoretical framework and scoring methodology, called STAGES, for sentence completion tests of meaning-making maturity or complexity (also called ego development or perspective-taking capacity). STAGES builds upon research on the substantially validated Washington University Sentence Completion Test of Jane Loevinger as updated by Susanne Cook-Greuter. STAGES proposes an underlying structural explanation for the Cook-Greuter system based on three dimensions. Two of these are polar factors: individual/collective, and passive/active; and the third is a categorization of the sophistication of the types of objects referred to (i.e. as concrete, subtle/abstract, or "metaware"). We describe two validation studies for the STAGES scoring method and model. The first is a replication study of concurrent validity, using 73 inventories to test the hypothesis that the STAGES scoring method replicates the Cook-Greuter scoring method. Using the weighted Kappa statistic, we demonstrate a very strong match between the two methods, confirming the first hypothesis. This study includes levels up to and including Strategist (i.e. a substantial percentage of test-takers from most populations). Levels above Strategist were validated using another method because (1) there is less Cook-Greuter data available at these levels, and (2) the two scoring methods diverge sufficiently, making comparison difficult. The second study, of 71 inventories, attempts to validate the STAGES scoring method at levels above Strategist by testing the inter-rater reliability among four scorers. The inter-rater reliability above Strategist, using the weighted Kappa statistic, was found to be moderate to substantial, indicating that the instrument and scoring method has internal validity for these four, rare higher levels. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability over all STAGES levels were found to be very strong.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7090352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70903522020-03-25 The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language O'Fallon, Terri Polissar, Nayak Neradilek, Moni Blazej Murray, Tom Heliyon Article We describe research on the validity of a new theoretical framework and scoring methodology, called STAGES, for sentence completion tests of meaning-making maturity or complexity (also called ego development or perspective-taking capacity). STAGES builds upon research on the substantially validated Washington University Sentence Completion Test of Jane Loevinger as updated by Susanne Cook-Greuter. STAGES proposes an underlying structural explanation for the Cook-Greuter system based on three dimensions. Two of these are polar factors: individual/collective, and passive/active; and the third is a categorization of the sophistication of the types of objects referred to (i.e. as concrete, subtle/abstract, or "metaware"). We describe two validation studies for the STAGES scoring method and model. The first is a replication study of concurrent validity, using 73 inventories to test the hypothesis that the STAGES scoring method replicates the Cook-Greuter scoring method. Using the weighted Kappa statistic, we demonstrate a very strong match between the two methods, confirming the first hypothesis. This study includes levels up to and including Strategist (i.e. a substantial percentage of test-takers from most populations). Levels above Strategist were validated using another method because (1) there is less Cook-Greuter data available at these levels, and (2) the two scoring methods diverge sufficiently, making comparison difficult. The second study, of 71 inventories, attempts to validate the STAGES scoring method at levels above Strategist by testing the inter-rater reliability among four scorers. The inter-rater reliability above Strategist, using the weighted Kappa statistic, was found to be moderate to substantial, indicating that the instrument and scoring method has internal validity for these four, rare higher levels. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability over all STAGES levels were found to be very strong. Elsevier 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7090352/ /pubmed/32215323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03472 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
O'Fallon, Terri
Polissar, Nayak
Neradilek, Moni Blazej
Murray, Tom
The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
title The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
title_full The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
title_fullStr The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
title_full_unstemmed The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
title_short The validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
title_sort validation of a new scoring method for assessing ego development based on three dimensions of language
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03472
work_keys_str_mv AT ofallonterri thevalidationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT polissarnayak thevalidationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT neradilekmoniblazej thevalidationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT murraytom thevalidationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT ofallonterri validationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT polissarnayak validationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT neradilekmoniblazej validationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage
AT murraytom validationofanewscoringmethodforassessingegodevelopmentbasedonthreedimensionsoflanguage