Cargando…

Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection

Microwave has been extensively applied to inactivate microorganisms in liquids, food, and surfaces. However, energy efficiency is a limiting factor for the environmental application. The utilization pathway and energy efficiency of the microwave in different media have not been investigated. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Can, Hu, Xurui, Zhang, Zhiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105437
_version_ 1783510466741403648
author Wang, Can
Hu, Xurui
Zhang, Zhiwei
author_facet Wang, Can
Hu, Xurui
Zhang, Zhiwei
author_sort Wang, Can
collection PubMed
description Microwave has been extensively applied to inactivate microorganisms in liquids, food, and surfaces. However, energy efficiency is a limiting factor for the environmental application. The utilization pathway and energy efficiency of the microwave in different media have not been investigated. In this study, the inactivation performance, energy utilization, and bactericidal mechanisms for microwave-irradiated airborne and waterborne Escherichia coli were compared. A Beer-Lambert law-based model was also developed and validated to compare the inactivation performance in different phases. Microwave had greater inactivation effect on airborne bacteria than waterborne bacteria. The inactivation rate constant for airborne E. coli (0.29 s(−1)) was nearly 20 times higher than that of waterborne species (0.014 s(−1)). Most of the absorbed microwave energy (92.3%) was converted to increase water temperature instead of inactivating the waterborne bacteria, because the microwave photons were easily absorbed by water molecules. By contrast, 45.4% of the absorbed energy could disinfect the airborne bacteria. Finally, the required energies for 1-log inactivation were calculated as 2.3 J and 116.9 J per log-inactivation for airborne and waterborne E. coli, respectively. The airborne and waterborne E. coli samples showed distinct microwave inactivation mechanisms. Waterborne E. coli disinfection was primarily due to thermal effect, while the non-thermal effect was the major mechanism for airborne E. coli inactivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7094417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70944172020-03-25 Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection Wang, Can Hu, Xurui Zhang, Zhiwei J Aerosol Sci Article Microwave has been extensively applied to inactivate microorganisms in liquids, food, and surfaces. However, energy efficiency is a limiting factor for the environmental application. The utilization pathway and energy efficiency of the microwave in different media have not been investigated. In this study, the inactivation performance, energy utilization, and bactericidal mechanisms for microwave-irradiated airborne and waterborne Escherichia coli were compared. A Beer-Lambert law-based model was also developed and validated to compare the inactivation performance in different phases. Microwave had greater inactivation effect on airborne bacteria than waterborne bacteria. The inactivation rate constant for airborne E. coli (0.29 s(−1)) was nearly 20 times higher than that of waterborne species (0.014 s(−1)). Most of the absorbed microwave energy (92.3%) was converted to increase water temperature instead of inactivating the waterborne bacteria, because the microwave photons were easily absorbed by water molecules. By contrast, 45.4% of the absorbed energy could disinfect the airborne bacteria. Finally, the required energies for 1-log inactivation were calculated as 2.3 J and 116.9 J per log-inactivation for airborne and waterborne E. coli, respectively. The airborne and waterborne E. coli samples showed distinct microwave inactivation mechanisms. Waterborne E. coli disinfection was primarily due to thermal effect, while the non-thermal effect was the major mechanism for airborne E. coli inactivation. Elsevier Ltd. 2019-11 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7094417/ /pubmed/32226120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105437 Text en © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Can
Hu, Xurui
Zhang, Zhiwei
Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
title Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
title_full Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
title_fullStr Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
title_full_unstemmed Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
title_short Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
title_sort airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105437
work_keys_str_mv AT wangcan airbornedisinfectionusingmicrowavebasedtechnologyenergyefficientanddistinctinactivationmechanismcomparedwithwaterbornedisinfection
AT huxurui airbornedisinfectionusingmicrowavebasedtechnologyenergyefficientanddistinctinactivationmechanismcomparedwithwaterbornedisinfection
AT zhangzhiwei airbornedisinfectionusingmicrowavebasedtechnologyenergyefficientanddistinctinactivationmechanismcomparedwithwaterbornedisinfection