Cargando…
Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions
The envelope spike (S) glycoprotein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) mediates the entry of the virus into target cells. Recent studies point out to a cell entry mechanism of this virus similar to other enveloped viruses, such as HIV-1. As it happens with oth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16290276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.10.001 |
_version_ | 1783514269027926016 |
---|---|
author | Veiga, Salomé Yuan, Yunyun Li, Xuqin Santos, Nuno C. Liu, Gang Castanho, Miguel A.R.B. |
author_facet | Veiga, Salomé Yuan, Yunyun Li, Xuqin Santos, Nuno C. Liu, Gang Castanho, Miguel A.R.B. |
author_sort | Veiga, Salomé |
collection | PubMed |
description | The envelope spike (S) glycoprotein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) mediates the entry of the virus into target cells. Recent studies point out to a cell entry mechanism of this virus similar to other enveloped viruses, such as HIV-1. As it happens with other viruses peptidic fusion inhibitors, SARS-CoV S protein HR2-derived peptides are potential therapeutic drugs against the virus. It is believed that HR2 peptides block the six-helix bundle formation, a key structure in the viral fusion, by interacting with the HR1 region. It is a matter of discussion if the HIV-1 gp41 HR2-derived peptide T20 (enfuvirtide) could be a possible SARS-CoV inhibitor given the similarities between the two viruses. We tested the possibility of interaction between both T20 (HIV-1 gp41 HR2-derived peptide) and T-1249 with S protein HR1- and HR2-derived peptides. Our biophysical data show a significant interaction between a SARS-CoV HR1-derived peptide and T20. However, the interaction is only moderate (K(B) = (1.1 ± 0.3) × 10(5) M(−1)). This finding shows that the reasoning behind the hypothesis that T20, already approved for clinical application in AIDS treatment, could inhibit the fusion of SARS-CoV with target cells is correct but the effect may not be strong enough for application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7116955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71169552020-04-02 Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions Veiga, Salomé Yuan, Yunyun Li, Xuqin Santos, Nuno C. Liu, Gang Castanho, Miguel A.R.B. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj Article The envelope spike (S) glycoprotein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) mediates the entry of the virus into target cells. Recent studies point out to a cell entry mechanism of this virus similar to other enveloped viruses, such as HIV-1. As it happens with other viruses peptidic fusion inhibitors, SARS-CoV S protein HR2-derived peptides are potential therapeutic drugs against the virus. It is believed that HR2 peptides block the six-helix bundle formation, a key structure in the viral fusion, by interacting with the HR1 region. It is a matter of discussion if the HIV-1 gp41 HR2-derived peptide T20 (enfuvirtide) could be a possible SARS-CoV inhibitor given the similarities between the two viruses. We tested the possibility of interaction between both T20 (HIV-1 gp41 HR2-derived peptide) and T-1249 with S protein HR1- and HR2-derived peptides. Our biophysical data show a significant interaction between a SARS-CoV HR1-derived peptide and T20. However, the interaction is only moderate (K(B) = (1.1 ± 0.3) × 10(5) M(−1)). This finding shows that the reasoning behind the hypothesis that T20, already approved for clinical application in AIDS treatment, could inhibit the fusion of SARS-CoV with target cells is correct but the effect may not be strong enough for application. Elsevier B.V. 2006-01 2005-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7116955/ /pubmed/16290276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.10.001 Text en Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Veiga, Salomé Yuan, Yunyun Li, Xuqin Santos, Nuno C. Liu, Gang Castanho, Miguel A.R.B. Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
title | Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
title_full | Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
title_fullStr | Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
title_short | Why are HIV-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against SARS-CoV? Biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
title_sort | why are hiv-1 fusion inhibitors not effective against sars-cov? biophysical evaluation of molecular interactions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16290276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.10.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veigasalome whyarehiv1fusioninhibitorsnoteffectiveagainstsarscovbiophysicalevaluationofmolecularinteractions AT yuanyunyun whyarehiv1fusioninhibitorsnoteffectiveagainstsarscovbiophysicalevaluationofmolecularinteractions AT lixuqin whyarehiv1fusioninhibitorsnoteffectiveagainstsarscovbiophysicalevaluationofmolecularinteractions AT santosnunoc whyarehiv1fusioninhibitorsnoteffectiveagainstsarscovbiophysicalevaluationofmolecularinteractions AT liugang whyarehiv1fusioninhibitorsnoteffectiveagainstsarscovbiophysicalevaluationofmolecularinteractions AT castanhomiguelarb whyarehiv1fusioninhibitorsnoteffectiveagainstsarscovbiophysicalevaluationofmolecularinteractions |