Cargando…

A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting

The X chromosome is known to play an important role in many sex-specific diseases. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome have been found to be associated with diseases. Compared to the autosomes, conducting association tests on the X chromosome is more intractable d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yu, Xu, Si-Qi, Liu, Wei, Fung, Wing Kam, Zhou, Ji-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672320000026
_version_ 1783517461566455808
author Zhang, Yu
Xu, Si-Qi
Liu, Wei
Fung, Wing Kam
Zhou, Ji-Yuan
author_facet Zhang, Yu
Xu, Si-Qi
Liu, Wei
Fung, Wing Kam
Zhou, Ji-Yuan
author_sort Zhang, Yu
collection PubMed
description The X chromosome is known to play an important role in many sex-specific diseases. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome have been found to be associated with diseases. Compared to the autosomes, conducting association tests on the X chromosome is more intractable due to the difference in the number of X chromosomes between females and males. On the other hand, X-chromosome inactivation takes place in female mammals, which is a phenomenon in which the expression of one copy of two X chromosomes in females is silenced in order to achieve the same gene expression level as that in males. In addition, imprinting effects may be related to certain diseases. Currently, there are some existing approaches taking X-chromosome inactivation into account when testing for associations on the X chromosome. However, none of them allows for imprinting effects. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a robust test, Z(XCII), which accounts for both X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting effects without requiring specifying the genetic models in advance. Simulation studies are conducted in order to investigate the validity and performance of Z(XCII) under various scenarios of different parameter values. The simulation results show that Z(XCII) controls the type I error rate well when there is no association. Furthermore, with regards to power, Z(XCII) is robust in all of the situations considered and generally outperforms most of the existing methods in the presence of imprinting effects, especially under complete imprinting effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7132553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71325532020-04-13 A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting Zhang, Yu Xu, Si-Qi Liu, Wei Fung, Wing Kam Zhou, Ji-Yuan Genet Res (Camb) Research Paper The X chromosome is known to play an important role in many sex-specific diseases. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome have been found to be associated with diseases. Compared to the autosomes, conducting association tests on the X chromosome is more intractable due to the difference in the number of X chromosomes between females and males. On the other hand, X-chromosome inactivation takes place in female mammals, which is a phenomenon in which the expression of one copy of two X chromosomes in females is silenced in order to achieve the same gene expression level as that in males. In addition, imprinting effects may be related to certain diseases. Currently, there are some existing approaches taking X-chromosome inactivation into account when testing for associations on the X chromosome. However, none of them allows for imprinting effects. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a robust test, Z(XCII), which accounts for both X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting effects without requiring specifying the genetic models in advance. Simulation studies are conducted in order to investigate the validity and performance of Z(XCII) under various scenarios of different parameter values. The simulation results show that Z(XCII) controls the type I error rate well when there is no association. Furthermore, with regards to power, Z(XCII) is robust in all of the situations considered and generally outperforms most of the existing methods in the presence of imprinting effects, especially under complete imprinting effects. Cambridge University Press 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7132553/ /pubmed/32234109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672320000026 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhang, Yu
Xu, Si-Qi
Liu, Wei
Fung, Wing Kam
Zhou, Ji-Yuan
A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
title A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
title_full A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
title_fullStr A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
title_full_unstemmed A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
title_short A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
title_sort robust test for x-chromosome genetic association accounting for x-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672320000026
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyu arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT xusiqi arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT liuwei arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT fungwingkam arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT zhoujiyuan arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT zhangyu robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT xusiqi robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT liuwei robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT fungwingkam robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting
AT zhoujiyuan robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting