Cargando…
A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting
The X chromosome is known to play an important role in many sex-specific diseases. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome have been found to be associated with diseases. Compared to the autosomes, conducting association tests on the X chromosome is more intractable d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672320000026 |
_version_ | 1783517461566455808 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yu Xu, Si-Qi Liu, Wei Fung, Wing Kam Zhou, Ji-Yuan |
author_facet | Zhang, Yu Xu, Si-Qi Liu, Wei Fung, Wing Kam Zhou, Ji-Yuan |
author_sort | Zhang, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The X chromosome is known to play an important role in many sex-specific diseases. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome have been found to be associated with diseases. Compared to the autosomes, conducting association tests on the X chromosome is more intractable due to the difference in the number of X chromosomes between females and males. On the other hand, X-chromosome inactivation takes place in female mammals, which is a phenomenon in which the expression of one copy of two X chromosomes in females is silenced in order to achieve the same gene expression level as that in males. In addition, imprinting effects may be related to certain diseases. Currently, there are some existing approaches taking X-chromosome inactivation into account when testing for associations on the X chromosome. However, none of them allows for imprinting effects. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a robust test, Z(XCII), which accounts for both X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting effects without requiring specifying the genetic models in advance. Simulation studies are conducted in order to investigate the validity and performance of Z(XCII) under various scenarios of different parameter values. The simulation results show that Z(XCII) controls the type I error rate well when there is no association. Furthermore, with regards to power, Z(XCII) is robust in all of the situations considered and generally outperforms most of the existing methods in the presence of imprinting effects, especially under complete imprinting effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7132553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71325532020-04-13 A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting Zhang, Yu Xu, Si-Qi Liu, Wei Fung, Wing Kam Zhou, Ji-Yuan Genet Res (Camb) Research Paper The X chromosome is known to play an important role in many sex-specific diseases. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome have been found to be associated with diseases. Compared to the autosomes, conducting association tests on the X chromosome is more intractable due to the difference in the number of X chromosomes between females and males. On the other hand, X-chromosome inactivation takes place in female mammals, which is a phenomenon in which the expression of one copy of two X chromosomes in females is silenced in order to achieve the same gene expression level as that in males. In addition, imprinting effects may be related to certain diseases. Currently, there are some existing approaches taking X-chromosome inactivation into account when testing for associations on the X chromosome. However, none of them allows for imprinting effects. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a robust test, Z(XCII), which accounts for both X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting effects without requiring specifying the genetic models in advance. Simulation studies are conducted in order to investigate the validity and performance of Z(XCII) under various scenarios of different parameter values. The simulation results show that Z(XCII) controls the type I error rate well when there is no association. Furthermore, with regards to power, Z(XCII) is robust in all of the situations considered and generally outperforms most of the existing methods in the presence of imprinting effects, especially under complete imprinting effects. Cambridge University Press 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7132553/ /pubmed/32234109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672320000026 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Zhang, Yu Xu, Si-Qi Liu, Wei Fung, Wing Kam Zhou, Ji-Yuan A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
title | A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
title_full | A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
title_fullStr | A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
title_full_unstemmed | A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
title_short | A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
title_sort | robust test for x-chromosome genetic association accounting for x-chromosome inactivation and imprinting |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672320000026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyu arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT xusiqi arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT liuwei arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT fungwingkam arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT zhoujiyuan arobusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT zhangyu robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT xusiqi robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT liuwei robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT fungwingkam robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting AT zhoujiyuan robusttestforxchromosomegeneticassociationaccountingforxchromosomeinactivationandimprinting |