Cargando…

Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material

BACKGROUND: Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostics is needed to guide therapeutic decisions for cancer patients. Although less material becomes available for testing, genetic markers are rapidly expanding. Simultaneous detection of predictive markers, including mutations, gene amplifications a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P., Kroeze, Leonie I., Tops, Bastiaan B. J., van Kempen, Leon C., ter Elst, Arja, Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M., Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B., Hermsen, Mandy J. W., Jansen, Erik A. M., Nederlof, Petra M., Schuuring, Ed, Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L., Eijkelenboom, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6
_version_ 1783518431068291072
author Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P.
Kroeze, Leonie I.
Tops, Bastiaan B. J.
van Kempen, Leon C.
ter Elst, Arja
Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M.
Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B.
Hermsen, Mandy J. W.
Jansen, Erik A. M.
Nederlof, Petra M.
Schuuring, Ed
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Eijkelenboom, Astrid
author_facet Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P.
Kroeze, Leonie I.
Tops, Bastiaan B. J.
van Kempen, Leon C.
ter Elst, Arja
Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M.
Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B.
Hermsen, Mandy J. W.
Jansen, Erik A. M.
Nederlof, Petra M.
Schuuring, Ed
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Eijkelenboom, Astrid
author_sort Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostics is needed to guide therapeutic decisions for cancer patients. Although less material becomes available for testing, genetic markers are rapidly expanding. Simultaneous detection of predictive markers, including mutations, gene amplifications and MSI, will save valuable material, time and costs. METHODS: Using a single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP)-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach, we developed an NGS panel allowing detection of predictive mutations in 33 genes, gene amplifications of 13 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) by the evaluation of 55 microsatellite markers. The panel was designed to target all clinically relevant single and multiple nucleotide mutations in routinely available lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumor samples, but is useful for a broader set of tumor types. RESULTS: The smMIP-based NGS panel was successfully validated and cut-off values were established for reliable gene amplification analysis (i.e. relative coverage ≥3) and MSI detection (≥30% unstable loci). After validation, 728 routine diagnostic tumor samples including a broad range of tumor types were sequenced with sufficient sensitivity (2.4% drop-out), including samples with low DNA input (< 10 ng; 88% successful), low tumor purity (5–10%; 77% successful), and cytological material (90% successful). 75% of these tumor samples showed ≥1 (likely) pathogenic mutation, including targetable mutations (e.g. EGFR, BRAF, MET, ERBB2, KIT, PDGFRA). Amplifications were observed in 5.5% of the samples, comprising clinically relevant amplifications (e.g. MET, ERBB2, FGFR1). 1.5% of the tumor samples were classified as MSI-high, including both MSI-prone and non-MSI-prone tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a comprehensive workflow for predictive analysis of diagnostic tumor samples. The smMIP-based NGS analysis was shown suitable for limited amounts of histological and cytological material. As smMIP technology allows easy adaptation of panels, this approach can comply with the rapidly expanding molecular markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71374512020-04-11 Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P. Kroeze, Leonie I. Tops, Bastiaan B. J. van Kempen, Leon C. ter Elst, Arja Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M. Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B. Hermsen, Mandy J. W. Jansen, Erik A. M. Nederlof, Petra M. Schuuring, Ed Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Eijkelenboom, Astrid BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostics is needed to guide therapeutic decisions for cancer patients. Although less material becomes available for testing, genetic markers are rapidly expanding. Simultaneous detection of predictive markers, including mutations, gene amplifications and MSI, will save valuable material, time and costs. METHODS: Using a single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP)-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach, we developed an NGS panel allowing detection of predictive mutations in 33 genes, gene amplifications of 13 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) by the evaluation of 55 microsatellite markers. The panel was designed to target all clinically relevant single and multiple nucleotide mutations in routinely available lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumor samples, but is useful for a broader set of tumor types. RESULTS: The smMIP-based NGS panel was successfully validated and cut-off values were established for reliable gene amplification analysis (i.e. relative coverage ≥3) and MSI detection (≥30% unstable loci). After validation, 728 routine diagnostic tumor samples including a broad range of tumor types were sequenced with sufficient sensitivity (2.4% drop-out), including samples with low DNA input (< 10 ng; 88% successful), low tumor purity (5–10%; 77% successful), and cytological material (90% successful). 75% of these tumor samples showed ≥1 (likely) pathogenic mutation, including targetable mutations (e.g. EGFR, BRAF, MET, ERBB2, KIT, PDGFRA). Amplifications were observed in 5.5% of the samples, comprising clinically relevant amplifications (e.g. MET, ERBB2, FGFR1). 1.5% of the tumor samples were classified as MSI-high, including both MSI-prone and non-MSI-prone tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a comprehensive workflow for predictive analysis of diagnostic tumor samples. The smMIP-based NGS analysis was shown suitable for limited amounts of histological and cytological material. As smMIP technology allows easy adaptation of panels, this approach can comply with the rapidly expanding molecular markers. BioMed Central 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7137451/ /pubmed/32264863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P.
Kroeze, Leonie I.
Tops, Bastiaan B. J.
van Kempen, Leon C.
ter Elst, Arja
Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M.
Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B.
Hermsen, Mandy J. W.
Jansen, Erik A. M.
Nederlof, Petra M.
Schuuring, Ed
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Eijkelenboom, Astrid
Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
title Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
title_full Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
title_fullStr Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
title_short Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
title_sort comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in ffpe tumor material
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6
work_keys_str_mv AT steeghselisabethmp comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT kroezeleoniei comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT topsbastiaanbj comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT vankempenleonc comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT terelstarja comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT kastnervanraaijannemiekwm comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT hendrikscornelissensandrajb comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT hermsenmandyjw comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT jansenerikam comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT nederlofpetram comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT schuuringed comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial
AT eijkelenboomastrid comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial