Cargando…
Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
BACKGROUND: Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostics is needed to guide therapeutic decisions for cancer patients. Although less material becomes available for testing, genetic markers are rapidly expanding. Simultaneous detection of predictive markers, including mutations, gene amplifications a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6 |
_version_ | 1783518431068291072 |
---|---|
author | Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P. Kroeze, Leonie I. Tops, Bastiaan B. J. van Kempen, Leon C. ter Elst, Arja Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M. Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B. Hermsen, Mandy J. W. Jansen, Erik A. M. Nederlof, Petra M. Schuuring, Ed Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Eijkelenboom, Astrid |
author_facet | Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P. Kroeze, Leonie I. Tops, Bastiaan B. J. van Kempen, Leon C. ter Elst, Arja Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M. Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B. Hermsen, Mandy J. W. Jansen, Erik A. M. Nederlof, Petra M. Schuuring, Ed Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Eijkelenboom, Astrid |
author_sort | Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostics is needed to guide therapeutic decisions for cancer patients. Although less material becomes available for testing, genetic markers are rapidly expanding. Simultaneous detection of predictive markers, including mutations, gene amplifications and MSI, will save valuable material, time and costs. METHODS: Using a single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP)-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach, we developed an NGS panel allowing detection of predictive mutations in 33 genes, gene amplifications of 13 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) by the evaluation of 55 microsatellite markers. The panel was designed to target all clinically relevant single and multiple nucleotide mutations in routinely available lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumor samples, but is useful for a broader set of tumor types. RESULTS: The smMIP-based NGS panel was successfully validated and cut-off values were established for reliable gene amplification analysis (i.e. relative coverage ≥3) and MSI detection (≥30% unstable loci). After validation, 728 routine diagnostic tumor samples including a broad range of tumor types were sequenced with sufficient sensitivity (2.4% drop-out), including samples with low DNA input (< 10 ng; 88% successful), low tumor purity (5–10%; 77% successful), and cytological material (90% successful). 75% of these tumor samples showed ≥1 (likely) pathogenic mutation, including targetable mutations (e.g. EGFR, BRAF, MET, ERBB2, KIT, PDGFRA). Amplifications were observed in 5.5% of the samples, comprising clinically relevant amplifications (e.g. MET, ERBB2, FGFR1). 1.5% of the tumor samples were classified as MSI-high, including both MSI-prone and non-MSI-prone tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a comprehensive workflow for predictive analysis of diagnostic tumor samples. The smMIP-based NGS analysis was shown suitable for limited amounts of histological and cytological material. As smMIP technology allows easy adaptation of panels, this approach can comply with the rapidly expanding molecular markers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7137451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71374512020-04-11 Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P. Kroeze, Leonie I. Tops, Bastiaan B. J. van Kempen, Leon C. ter Elst, Arja Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M. Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B. Hermsen, Mandy J. W. Jansen, Erik A. M. Nederlof, Petra M. Schuuring, Ed Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Eijkelenboom, Astrid BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostics is needed to guide therapeutic decisions for cancer patients. Although less material becomes available for testing, genetic markers are rapidly expanding. Simultaneous detection of predictive markers, including mutations, gene amplifications and MSI, will save valuable material, time and costs. METHODS: Using a single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP)-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach, we developed an NGS panel allowing detection of predictive mutations in 33 genes, gene amplifications of 13 genes and microsatellite instability (MSI) by the evaluation of 55 microsatellite markers. The panel was designed to target all clinically relevant single and multiple nucleotide mutations in routinely available lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumor samples, but is useful for a broader set of tumor types. RESULTS: The smMIP-based NGS panel was successfully validated and cut-off values were established for reliable gene amplification analysis (i.e. relative coverage ≥3) and MSI detection (≥30% unstable loci). After validation, 728 routine diagnostic tumor samples including a broad range of tumor types were sequenced with sufficient sensitivity (2.4% drop-out), including samples with low DNA input (< 10 ng; 88% successful), low tumor purity (5–10%; 77% successful), and cytological material (90% successful). 75% of these tumor samples showed ≥1 (likely) pathogenic mutation, including targetable mutations (e.g. EGFR, BRAF, MET, ERBB2, KIT, PDGFRA). Amplifications were observed in 5.5% of the samples, comprising clinically relevant amplifications (e.g. MET, ERBB2, FGFR1). 1.5% of the tumor samples were classified as MSI-high, including both MSI-prone and non-MSI-prone tumors. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a comprehensive workflow for predictive analysis of diagnostic tumor samples. The smMIP-based NGS analysis was shown suitable for limited amounts of histological and cytological material. As smMIP technology allows easy adaptation of panels, this approach can comply with the rapidly expanding molecular markers. BioMed Central 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7137451/ /pubmed/32264863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Steeghs, Elisabeth M. P. Kroeze, Leonie I. Tops, Bastiaan B. J. van Kempen, Leon C. ter Elst, Arja Kastner-van Raaij, Annemiek W. M. Hendriks-Cornelissen, Sandra J. B. Hermsen, Mandy J. W. Jansen, Erik A. M. Nederlof, Petra M. Schuuring, Ed Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Eijkelenboom, Astrid Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material |
title | Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material |
title_full | Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material |
title_short | Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material |
title_sort | comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in ffpe tumor material |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steeghselisabethmp comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT kroezeleoniei comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT topsbastiaanbj comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT vankempenleonc comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT terelstarja comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT kastnervanraaijannemiekwm comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT hendrikscornelissensandrajb comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT hermsenmandyjw comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT jansenerikam comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT nederlofpetram comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT schuuringed comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial AT eijkelenboomastrid comprehensiveroutinediagnosticscreeningtoidentifypredictivemutationsgeneamplificationsandmicrosatelliteinstabilityinffpetumormaterial |