Cargando…

A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy

This article presents the results of a study that examined students’ ability to retain what they have learned in an anatomy course after thirty days via using various learning tools for twenty minutes. Fifty-two second-year medical students were randomly assigned to three learning tools: text-only,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chris, Daniel, Ben Kei, Asil, Mustafa, Khwaounjoo, Prashanna, Cakmak, Yusuf Ozgur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62855-6
_version_ 1783520069169446912
author Wang, Chris
Daniel, Ben Kei
Asil, Mustafa
Khwaounjoo, Prashanna
Cakmak, Yusuf Ozgur
author_facet Wang, Chris
Daniel, Ben Kei
Asil, Mustafa
Khwaounjoo, Prashanna
Cakmak, Yusuf Ozgur
author_sort Wang, Chris
collection PubMed
description This article presents the results of a study that examined students’ ability to retain what they have learned in an anatomy course after thirty days via using various learning tools for twenty minutes. Fifty-two second-year medical students were randomly assigned to three learning tools: text-only, three-dimension visualisation in a two-dimensional screen (3DM), or mixed reality (MR). An anatomy test lasting for twenty minutes measuring spatial and nominal knowledge was taken immediately after the learning intervention and another thirty days later. Psychometric tests were also used to measure participants’ memory, reasoning and concentration abilities. Additionally, electroencephalogram data was captured to measure the participants’ awakeness during the learning session. Results of this study showed that the MR group performed poorly in the nominal questions compared to the other groups; however, the MR group demonstrated higher retention in both the nominal and spatial type information for at least a month compared to the other groups. Furthermore, participants in the 3DM and MR groups reported increased engagement. The results of this study suggest that three-dimensional visualiser tools are likely to enhance learning in anatomy education. However, the study itself has several limitations; some include limited sample size and various threats to internal validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7145854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71458542020-04-15 A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy Wang, Chris Daniel, Ben Kei Asil, Mustafa Khwaounjoo, Prashanna Cakmak, Yusuf Ozgur Sci Rep Article This article presents the results of a study that examined students’ ability to retain what they have learned in an anatomy course after thirty days via using various learning tools for twenty minutes. Fifty-two second-year medical students were randomly assigned to three learning tools: text-only, three-dimension visualisation in a two-dimensional screen (3DM), or mixed reality (MR). An anatomy test lasting for twenty minutes measuring spatial and nominal knowledge was taken immediately after the learning intervention and another thirty days later. Psychometric tests were also used to measure participants’ memory, reasoning and concentration abilities. Additionally, electroencephalogram data was captured to measure the participants’ awakeness during the learning session. Results of this study showed that the MR group performed poorly in the nominal questions compared to the other groups; however, the MR group demonstrated higher retention in both the nominal and spatial type information for at least a month compared to the other groups. Furthermore, participants in the 3DM and MR groups reported increased engagement. The results of this study suggest that three-dimensional visualiser tools are likely to enhance learning in anatomy education. However, the study itself has several limitations; some include limited sample size and various threats to internal validity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7145854/ /pubmed/32273563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62855-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Chris
Daniel, Ben Kei
Asil, Mustafa
Khwaounjoo, Prashanna
Cakmak, Yusuf Ozgur
A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy
title A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy
title_full A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy
title_fullStr A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy
title_full_unstemmed A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy
title_short A Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Learning Tools in Anatomy
title_sort randomised control trial and comparative analysis of multi-dimensional learning tools in anatomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62855-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchris arandomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT danielbenkei arandomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT asilmustafa arandomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT khwaounjooprashanna arandomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT cakmakyusufozgur arandomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT wangchris randomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT danielbenkei randomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT asilmustafa randomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT khwaounjooprashanna randomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy
AT cakmakyusufozgur randomisedcontroltrialandcomparativeanalysisofmultidimensionallearningtoolsinanatomy