Cargando…

A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity

Cancer cells upregulate anabolic processes to maintain high rates of cellular turnover. Limiting the supply of macromolecular precursors by targeting enzymes involved in biosynthesis is a promising strategy in cancer therapy. Several tumors excessively metabolize glutamine to generate precursors for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Katharina, Hartmann, Rudolf, Tsiampali, Julia, Uhlmann, Constanze, Nickel, Ann-Christin, He, Xiaoling, Kamp, Marcel A., Sabel, Michael, Barker, Roger A., Steiger, Hans-Jakob, Hänggi, Daniel, Willbold, Dieter, Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw, Kahlert, Ulf D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-0258-3
_version_ 1783523119540994048
author Koch, Katharina
Hartmann, Rudolf
Tsiampali, Julia
Uhlmann, Constanze
Nickel, Ann-Christin
He, Xiaoling
Kamp, Marcel A.
Sabel, Michael
Barker, Roger A.
Steiger, Hans-Jakob
Hänggi, Daniel
Willbold, Dieter
Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw
Kahlert, Ulf D.
author_facet Koch, Katharina
Hartmann, Rudolf
Tsiampali, Julia
Uhlmann, Constanze
Nickel, Ann-Christin
He, Xiaoling
Kamp, Marcel A.
Sabel, Michael
Barker, Roger A.
Steiger, Hans-Jakob
Hänggi, Daniel
Willbold, Dieter
Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw
Kahlert, Ulf D.
author_sort Koch, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Cancer cells upregulate anabolic processes to maintain high rates of cellular turnover. Limiting the supply of macromolecular precursors by targeting enzymes involved in biosynthesis is a promising strategy in cancer therapy. Several tumors excessively metabolize glutamine to generate precursors for nonessential amino acids, nucleotides, and lipids, in a process called glutaminolysis. Here we show that pharmacological inhibition of glutaminase (GLS) eradicates glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs), a small cell subpopulation in glioblastoma (GBM) responsible for therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. Treatment with small molecule inhibitors compound 968 and CB839 effectively diminished cell growth and in vitro clonogenicity of GSC neurosphere cultures. However, our pharmaco-metabolic studies revealed that only CB839 inhibited GLS enzymatic activity thereby limiting the influx of glutamine derivates into the TCA cycle. Nevertheless, the effects of both inhibitors were highly GLS specific, since treatment sensitivity markedly correlated with GLS protein expression. Strikingly, we found GLS overexpressed in in vitro GSC models as compared with neural stem cells (NSC). Moreover, our study demonstrates the usefulness of in vitro pharmaco-metabolomics to score target specificity of compounds thereby refining drug development and risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71629172020-04-24 A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity Koch, Katharina Hartmann, Rudolf Tsiampali, Julia Uhlmann, Constanze Nickel, Ann-Christin He, Xiaoling Kamp, Marcel A. Sabel, Michael Barker, Roger A. Steiger, Hans-Jakob Hänggi, Daniel Willbold, Dieter Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw Kahlert, Ulf D. Cell Death Discov Article Cancer cells upregulate anabolic processes to maintain high rates of cellular turnover. Limiting the supply of macromolecular precursors by targeting enzymes involved in biosynthesis is a promising strategy in cancer therapy. Several tumors excessively metabolize glutamine to generate precursors for nonessential amino acids, nucleotides, and lipids, in a process called glutaminolysis. Here we show that pharmacological inhibition of glutaminase (GLS) eradicates glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs), a small cell subpopulation in glioblastoma (GBM) responsible for therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. Treatment with small molecule inhibitors compound 968 and CB839 effectively diminished cell growth and in vitro clonogenicity of GSC neurosphere cultures. However, our pharmaco-metabolic studies revealed that only CB839 inhibited GLS enzymatic activity thereby limiting the influx of glutamine derivates into the TCA cycle. Nevertheless, the effects of both inhibitors were highly GLS specific, since treatment sensitivity markedly correlated with GLS protein expression. Strikingly, we found GLS overexpressed in in vitro GSC models as compared with neural stem cells (NSC). Moreover, our study demonstrates the usefulness of in vitro pharmaco-metabolomics to score target specificity of compounds thereby refining drug development and risk assessment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162917/ /pubmed/32337072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-0258-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Koch, Katharina
Hartmann, Rudolf
Tsiampali, Julia
Uhlmann, Constanze
Nickel, Ann-Christin
He, Xiaoling
Kamp, Marcel A.
Sabel, Michael
Barker, Roger A.
Steiger, Hans-Jakob
Hänggi, Daniel
Willbold, Dieter
Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw
Kahlert, Ulf D.
A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
title A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
title_full A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
title_fullStr A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
title_full_unstemmed A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
title_short A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
title_sort comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-0258-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kochkatharina acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT hartmannrudolf acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT tsiampalijulia acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT uhlmannconstanze acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT nickelannchristin acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT hexiaoling acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT kampmarcela acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT sabelmichael acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT barkerrogera acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT steigerhansjakob acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT hanggidaniel acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT willbolddieter acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT maciaczykjaroslaw acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT kahlertulfd acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT kochkatharina comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT hartmannrudolf comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT tsiampalijulia comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT uhlmannconstanze comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT nickelannchristin comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT hexiaoling comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT kampmarcela comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT sabelmichael comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT barkerrogera comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT steigerhansjakob comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT hanggidaniel comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT willbolddieter comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT maciaczykjaroslaw comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity
AT kahlertulfd comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity