Cargando…
A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity
Cancer cells upregulate anabolic processes to maintain high rates of cellular turnover. Limiting the supply of macromolecular precursors by targeting enzymes involved in biosynthesis is a promising strategy in cancer therapy. Several tumors excessively metabolize glutamine to generate precursors for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-0258-3 |
_version_ | 1783523119540994048 |
---|---|
author | Koch, Katharina Hartmann, Rudolf Tsiampali, Julia Uhlmann, Constanze Nickel, Ann-Christin He, Xiaoling Kamp, Marcel A. Sabel, Michael Barker, Roger A. Steiger, Hans-Jakob Hänggi, Daniel Willbold, Dieter Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw Kahlert, Ulf D. |
author_facet | Koch, Katharina Hartmann, Rudolf Tsiampali, Julia Uhlmann, Constanze Nickel, Ann-Christin He, Xiaoling Kamp, Marcel A. Sabel, Michael Barker, Roger A. Steiger, Hans-Jakob Hänggi, Daniel Willbold, Dieter Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw Kahlert, Ulf D. |
author_sort | Koch, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cancer cells upregulate anabolic processes to maintain high rates of cellular turnover. Limiting the supply of macromolecular precursors by targeting enzymes involved in biosynthesis is a promising strategy in cancer therapy. Several tumors excessively metabolize glutamine to generate precursors for nonessential amino acids, nucleotides, and lipids, in a process called glutaminolysis. Here we show that pharmacological inhibition of glutaminase (GLS) eradicates glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs), a small cell subpopulation in glioblastoma (GBM) responsible for therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. Treatment with small molecule inhibitors compound 968 and CB839 effectively diminished cell growth and in vitro clonogenicity of GSC neurosphere cultures. However, our pharmaco-metabolic studies revealed that only CB839 inhibited GLS enzymatic activity thereby limiting the influx of glutamine derivates into the TCA cycle. Nevertheless, the effects of both inhibitors were highly GLS specific, since treatment sensitivity markedly correlated with GLS protein expression. Strikingly, we found GLS overexpressed in in vitro GSC models as compared with neural stem cells (NSC). Moreover, our study demonstrates the usefulness of in vitro pharmaco-metabolomics to score target specificity of compounds thereby refining drug development and risk assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7162917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71629172020-04-24 A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity Koch, Katharina Hartmann, Rudolf Tsiampali, Julia Uhlmann, Constanze Nickel, Ann-Christin He, Xiaoling Kamp, Marcel A. Sabel, Michael Barker, Roger A. Steiger, Hans-Jakob Hänggi, Daniel Willbold, Dieter Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw Kahlert, Ulf D. Cell Death Discov Article Cancer cells upregulate anabolic processes to maintain high rates of cellular turnover. Limiting the supply of macromolecular precursors by targeting enzymes involved in biosynthesis is a promising strategy in cancer therapy. Several tumors excessively metabolize glutamine to generate precursors for nonessential amino acids, nucleotides, and lipids, in a process called glutaminolysis. Here we show that pharmacological inhibition of glutaminase (GLS) eradicates glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs), a small cell subpopulation in glioblastoma (GBM) responsible for therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. Treatment with small molecule inhibitors compound 968 and CB839 effectively diminished cell growth and in vitro clonogenicity of GSC neurosphere cultures. However, our pharmaco-metabolic studies revealed that only CB839 inhibited GLS enzymatic activity thereby limiting the influx of glutamine derivates into the TCA cycle. Nevertheless, the effects of both inhibitors were highly GLS specific, since treatment sensitivity markedly correlated with GLS protein expression. Strikingly, we found GLS overexpressed in in vitro GSC models as compared with neural stem cells (NSC). Moreover, our study demonstrates the usefulness of in vitro pharmaco-metabolomics to score target specificity of compounds thereby refining drug development and risk assessment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162917/ /pubmed/32337072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-0258-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Koch, Katharina Hartmann, Rudolf Tsiampali, Julia Uhlmann, Constanze Nickel, Ann-Christin He, Xiaoling Kamp, Marcel A. Sabel, Michael Barker, Roger A. Steiger, Hans-Jakob Hänggi, Daniel Willbold, Dieter Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw Kahlert, Ulf D. A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
title | A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
title_full | A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
title_fullStr | A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
title_short | A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
title_sort | comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-0258-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kochkatharina acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT hartmannrudolf acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT tsiampalijulia acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT uhlmannconstanze acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT nickelannchristin acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT hexiaoling acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT kampmarcela acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT sabelmichael acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT barkerrogera acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT steigerhansjakob acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT hanggidaniel acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT willbolddieter acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT maciaczykjaroslaw acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT kahlertulfd acomparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT kochkatharina comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT hartmannrudolf comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT tsiampalijulia comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT uhlmannconstanze comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT nickelannchristin comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT hexiaoling comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT kampmarcela comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT sabelmichael comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT barkerrogera comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT steigerhansjakob comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT hanggidaniel comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT willbolddieter comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT maciaczykjaroslaw comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity AT kahlertulfd comparativepharmacometabolomicstudyofglutaminaseinhibitorsingliomastemlikecellsconfirmsbiologicaleffectivenessbutrevealsdifferencesintargetspecificity |