Cargando…

Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder

In obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), functional behaviors such as checking that a door is locked become dysfunctional, maladaptive, and debilitating. However, it is currently unknown how aversive and appetitive motivations interact to produce functional and dysfunctional behavior in OCD. Here we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vousden, George H., Paulcan, Sloane, Robbins, Trevor W., Eagle, Dawn M., Milton, Amy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.050260.119
_version_ 1783523309015531520
author Vousden, George H.
Paulcan, Sloane
Robbins, Trevor W.
Eagle, Dawn M.
Milton, Amy L.
author_facet Vousden, George H.
Paulcan, Sloane
Robbins, Trevor W.
Eagle, Dawn M.
Milton, Amy L.
author_sort Vousden, George H.
collection PubMed
description In obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), functional behaviors such as checking that a door is locked become dysfunctional, maladaptive, and debilitating. However, it is currently unknown how aversive and appetitive motivations interact to produce functional and dysfunctional behavior in OCD. Here we show a double dissociation in the effects of anxiogenic cues and sensitivity to rewarding stimuli on the propensity to develop functional and dysfunctional checking behavior in a rodent analog of OCD, the observing response task (ORT). While anxiogenic manipulations of perceived threat (presentation of threat-associated contextual cues) and actual threat (punishment of incorrect responding on the ORT) enhanced functional checking, dysfunctional checking was unaffected. In contrast, rats that had previously been identified as “sign-trackers” on an autoshaping task—and therefore were highly sensitive to the incentive salience of appetitive environmental cues—selectively showed elevated levels of dysfunctional checking under a range of conditions, but particularly so under conditions of uncertainty. These data indicate that functional and dysfunctional checking are dissociable and supported by aversive and appetitive motivational processes, respectively. While functional checking is modulated by perceived and actual threat, dysfunctional checking recruits appetitive motivational processes, possibly akin to the “incentive habits” that contribute to drug-seeking in addiction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71645132020-05-01 Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder Vousden, George H. Paulcan, Sloane Robbins, Trevor W. Eagle, Dawn M. Milton, Amy L. Learn Mem Research In obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), functional behaviors such as checking that a door is locked become dysfunctional, maladaptive, and debilitating. However, it is currently unknown how aversive and appetitive motivations interact to produce functional and dysfunctional behavior in OCD. Here we show a double dissociation in the effects of anxiogenic cues and sensitivity to rewarding stimuli on the propensity to develop functional and dysfunctional checking behavior in a rodent analog of OCD, the observing response task (ORT). While anxiogenic manipulations of perceived threat (presentation of threat-associated contextual cues) and actual threat (punishment of incorrect responding on the ORT) enhanced functional checking, dysfunctional checking was unaffected. In contrast, rats that had previously been identified as “sign-trackers” on an autoshaping task—and therefore were highly sensitive to the incentive salience of appetitive environmental cues—selectively showed elevated levels of dysfunctional checking under a range of conditions, but particularly so under conditions of uncertainty. These data indicate that functional and dysfunctional checking are dissociable and supported by aversive and appetitive motivational processes, respectively. While functional checking is modulated by perceived and actual threat, dysfunctional checking recruits appetitive motivational processes, possibly akin to the “incentive habits” that contribute to drug-seeking in addiction. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7164513/ /pubmed/32295839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.050260.119 Text en © 2020 Vousden et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article, published in Learning & Memory, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Vousden, George H.
Paulcan, Sloane
Robbins, Trevor W.
Eagle, Dawn M.
Milton, Amy L.
Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
title Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_full Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_fullStr Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_short Checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
title_sort checking responses of goal- and sign-trackers are differentially affected by threat in a rodent analog of obsessive–compulsive disorder
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.050260.119
work_keys_str_mv AT vousdengeorgeh checkingresponsesofgoalandsigntrackersaredifferentiallyaffectedbythreatinarodentanalogofobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT paulcansloane checkingresponsesofgoalandsigntrackersaredifferentiallyaffectedbythreatinarodentanalogofobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT robbinstrevorw checkingresponsesofgoalandsigntrackersaredifferentiallyaffectedbythreatinarodentanalogofobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT eagledawnm checkingresponsesofgoalandsigntrackersaredifferentiallyaffectedbythreatinarodentanalogofobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT miltonamyl checkingresponsesofgoalandsigntrackersaredifferentiallyaffectedbythreatinarodentanalogofobsessivecompulsivedisorder