Cargando…
The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatments, but for solid tumors they often leave a residual tumor-cell population. Here we investigated how cellular states might affect the response of individual cells in a clonal population to cisplatin, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic age...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society for Cell Biology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0515 |
_version_ | 1783526859843043328 |
---|---|
author | Granada, Adrián E. Jiménez, Alba Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob Blüthgen, Nils Reber, Simone Jambhekar, Ashwini Lahav, Galit |
author_facet | Granada, Adrián E. Jiménez, Alba Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob Blüthgen, Nils Reber, Simone Jambhekar, Ashwini Lahav, Galit |
author_sort | Granada, Adrián E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatments, but for solid tumors they often leave a residual tumor-cell population. Here we investigated how cellular states might affect the response of individual cells in a clonal population to cisplatin, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agent. Using a live-cell reporter of cell cycle phase and long-term imaging, we monitored single-cell proliferation before, at the time of, and after treatment. We found that in response to cisplatin, cells either arrested or died, and the ratio of these outcomes depended on the dose. While we found that the cell cycle phase at the time of cisplatin addition was not predictive of outcome, the proliferative history of the cell was: highly proliferative cells were more likely to arrest than to die, whereas slowly proliferating cells showed a higher probability of death. Information theory analysis revealed that the dose of cisplatin had the greatest influence on the cells’ decisions to arrest or die, and that the proliferation status interacted with the cisplatin dose to further guide this decision. These results show an unexpected effect of proliferation status in regulating responses to cisplatin and suggest that slowly proliferating cells within tumors may be acutely vulnerable to chemotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7185964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71859642020-06-16 The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy Granada, Adrián E. Jiménez, Alba Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob Blüthgen, Nils Reber, Simone Jambhekar, Ashwini Lahav, Galit Mol Biol Cell Articles DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatments, but for solid tumors they often leave a residual tumor-cell population. Here we investigated how cellular states might affect the response of individual cells in a clonal population to cisplatin, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agent. Using a live-cell reporter of cell cycle phase and long-term imaging, we monitored single-cell proliferation before, at the time of, and after treatment. We found that in response to cisplatin, cells either arrested or died, and the ratio of these outcomes depended on the dose. While we found that the cell cycle phase at the time of cisplatin addition was not predictive of outcome, the proliferative history of the cell was: highly proliferative cells were more likely to arrest than to die, whereas slowly proliferating cells showed a higher probability of death. Information theory analysis revealed that the dose of cisplatin had the greatest influence on the cells’ decisions to arrest or die, and that the proliferation status interacted with the cisplatin dose to further guide this decision. These results show an unexpected effect of proliferation status in regulating responses to cisplatin and suggest that slowly proliferating cells within tumors may be acutely vulnerable to chemotherapy. The American Society for Cell Biology 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7185964/ /pubmed/32049575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0515 Text en © 2020 Granada et al. “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Granada, Adrián E. Jiménez, Alba Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob Blüthgen, Nils Reber, Simone Jambhekar, Ashwini Lahav, Galit The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
title | The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
title_full | The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
title_short | The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
title_sort | effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granadaadriane theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT jimenezalba theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT stewartornsteinjacob theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT bluthgennils theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT rebersimone theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT jambhekarashwini theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT lahavgalit theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT granadaadriane effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT jimenezalba effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT stewartornsteinjacob effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT bluthgennils effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT rebersimone effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT jambhekarashwini effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy AT lahavgalit effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy |