Cargando…

The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy

DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatments, but for solid tumors they often leave a residual tumor-cell population. Here we investigated how cellular states might affect the response of individual cells in a clonal population to cisplatin, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granada, Adrián E., Jiménez, Alba, Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob, Blüthgen, Nils, Reber, Simone, Jambhekar, Ashwini, Lahav, Galit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0515
_version_ 1783526859843043328
author Granada, Adrián E.
Jiménez, Alba
Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob
Blüthgen, Nils
Reber, Simone
Jambhekar, Ashwini
Lahav, Galit
author_facet Granada, Adrián E.
Jiménez, Alba
Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob
Blüthgen, Nils
Reber, Simone
Jambhekar, Ashwini
Lahav, Galit
author_sort Granada, Adrián E.
collection PubMed
description DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatments, but for solid tumors they often leave a residual tumor-cell population. Here we investigated how cellular states might affect the response of individual cells in a clonal population to cisplatin, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agent. Using a live-cell reporter of cell cycle phase and long-term imaging, we monitored single-cell proliferation before, at the time of, and after treatment. We found that in response to cisplatin, cells either arrested or died, and the ratio of these outcomes depended on the dose. While we found that the cell cycle phase at the time of cisplatin addition was not predictive of outcome, the proliferative history of the cell was: highly proliferative cells were more likely to arrest than to die, whereas slowly proliferating cells showed a higher probability of death. Information theory analysis revealed that the dose of cisplatin had the greatest influence on the cells’ decisions to arrest or die, and that the proliferation status interacted with the cisplatin dose to further guide this decision. These results show an unexpected effect of proliferation status in regulating responses to cisplatin and suggest that slowly proliferating cells within tumors may be acutely vulnerable to chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7185964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71859642020-06-16 The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy Granada, Adrián E. Jiménez, Alba Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob Blüthgen, Nils Reber, Simone Jambhekar, Ashwini Lahav, Galit Mol Biol Cell Articles DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics are widely used in cancer treatments, but for solid tumors they often leave a residual tumor-cell population. Here we investigated how cellular states might affect the response of individual cells in a clonal population to cisplatin, a DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agent. Using a live-cell reporter of cell cycle phase and long-term imaging, we monitored single-cell proliferation before, at the time of, and after treatment. We found that in response to cisplatin, cells either arrested or died, and the ratio of these outcomes depended on the dose. While we found that the cell cycle phase at the time of cisplatin addition was not predictive of outcome, the proliferative history of the cell was: highly proliferative cells were more likely to arrest than to die, whereas slowly proliferating cells showed a higher probability of death. Information theory analysis revealed that the dose of cisplatin had the greatest influence on the cells’ decisions to arrest or die, and that the proliferation status interacted with the cisplatin dose to further guide this decision. These results show an unexpected effect of proliferation status in regulating responses to cisplatin and suggest that slowly proliferating cells within tumors may be acutely vulnerable to chemotherapy. The American Society for Cell Biology 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7185964/ /pubmed/32049575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0515 Text en © 2020 Granada et al. “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Articles
Granada, Adrián E.
Jiménez, Alba
Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob
Blüthgen, Nils
Reber, Simone
Jambhekar, Ashwini
Lahav, Galit
The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
title The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
title_full The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
title_fullStr The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
title_short The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
title_sort effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0515
work_keys_str_mv AT granadaadriane theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT jimenezalba theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT stewartornsteinjacob theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT bluthgennils theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT rebersimone theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT jambhekarashwini theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT lahavgalit theeffectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT granadaadriane effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT jimenezalba effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT stewartornsteinjacob effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT bluthgennils effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT rebersimone effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT jambhekarashwini effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy
AT lahavgalit effectsofproliferationstatusandcellcyclephaseontheresponsesofsinglecellstochemotherapy