Cargando…

Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION:  The widespread developments of the twenty-first century have been accompanied by the presentation of intellectual patterns and theories and new achievements. These new achievements emphasize the skill of thinking at high levels, especially in the educational system of universities. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KASALAEI, AFSHINEH, AMINI, MITRA, NABEIEI, PARISA, BAZRAFKAN, LEILA, MOUSAVINEZHAD, HOURI
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426391
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2020.83053.1080
_version_ 1783527400436400128
author KASALAEI, AFSHINEH
AMINI, MITRA
NABEIEI, PARISA
BAZRAFKAN, LEILA
MOUSAVINEZHAD, HOURI
author_facet KASALAEI, AFSHINEH
AMINI, MITRA
NABEIEI, PARISA
BAZRAFKAN, LEILA
MOUSAVINEZHAD, HOURI
author_sort KASALAEI, AFSHINEH
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION:  The widespread developments of the twenty-first century have been accompanied by the presentation of intellectual patterns and theories and new achievements. These new achievements emphasize the skill of thinking at high levels, especially in the educational system of universities. This skill is essential for medical students; therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the qualitative barriers of critical thinking in medical students' curriculum. METHODS:  This is a qualitative study in which the content analysis method has been used. Participants of this study included 11 medical education experts and medical students (6 females and 5 males) who were selected through a semi-structured interview and purposeful sampling. The data analysis method was conventional content analysis. In the next part, by more investigation of the data, various obtained concepts will be presented in the form of themes, categories, and subcategories. RESULTS: We obtained two themes (socio-cultural conditions and traditional and unchanging system of education), eight categories and 14 subcategories. Also, these categories were resistance to critical society, intellectual tension, personality characteristics, lack of understanding of society's need for criticism, the rule of traditional teaching pattern, lack of critical thinking skills, ineffective evaluation, and difficulty of critical thinking training. CONCLUSION:  Given the results and the main emphasis of curriculum planners on incorporating high-level critical thinking and revision skills into the curriculum, the country's academic education system requires a change in the thinking style, research, deepening critical thinking, and a change in teachers' attitudes toward curriculum designing (goals, content, teaching and evaluation methods); also, it is suggested that the authorities should pay attention to the need to develop and utilize critical thinking skills in the learners’ education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7188935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71889352020-05-18 Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study KASALAEI, AFSHINEH AMINI, MITRA NABEIEI, PARISA BAZRAFKAN, LEILA MOUSAVINEZHAD, HOURI J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION:  The widespread developments of the twenty-first century have been accompanied by the presentation of intellectual patterns and theories and new achievements. These new achievements emphasize the skill of thinking at high levels, especially in the educational system of universities. This skill is essential for medical students; therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the qualitative barriers of critical thinking in medical students' curriculum. METHODS:  This is a qualitative study in which the content analysis method has been used. Participants of this study included 11 medical education experts and medical students (6 females and 5 males) who were selected through a semi-structured interview and purposeful sampling. The data analysis method was conventional content analysis. In the next part, by more investigation of the data, various obtained concepts will be presented in the form of themes, categories, and subcategories. RESULTS: We obtained two themes (socio-cultural conditions and traditional and unchanging system of education), eight categories and 14 subcategories. Also, these categories were resistance to critical society, intellectual tension, personality characteristics, lack of understanding of society's need for criticism, the rule of traditional teaching pattern, lack of critical thinking skills, ineffective evaluation, and difficulty of critical thinking training. CONCLUSION:  Given the results and the main emphasis of curriculum planners on incorporating high-level critical thinking and revision skills into the curriculum, the country's academic education system requires a change in the thinking style, research, deepening critical thinking, and a change in teachers' attitudes toward curriculum designing (goals, content, teaching and evaluation methods); also, it is suggested that the authorities should pay attention to the need to develop and utilize critical thinking skills in the learners’ education. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7188935/ /pubmed/32426391 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2020.83053.1080 Text en Copyright: © 2020: Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
KASALAEI, AFSHINEH
AMINI, MITRA
NABEIEI, PARISA
BAZRAFKAN, LEILA
MOUSAVINEZHAD, HOURI
Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study
title Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study
title_full Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study
title_short Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study
title_sort barriers of critical thinking in medical students' curriculum from the viewpoint of medical education experts: a qualitative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426391
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2020.83053.1080
work_keys_str_mv AT kasalaeiafshineh barriersofcriticalthinkinginmedicalstudentscurriculumfromtheviewpointofmedicaleducationexpertsaqualitativestudy
AT aminimitra barriersofcriticalthinkinginmedicalstudentscurriculumfromtheviewpointofmedicaleducationexpertsaqualitativestudy
AT nabeieiparisa barriersofcriticalthinkinginmedicalstudentscurriculumfromtheviewpointofmedicaleducationexpertsaqualitativestudy
AT bazrafkanleila barriersofcriticalthinkinginmedicalstudentscurriculumfromtheviewpointofmedicaleducationexpertsaqualitativestudy
AT mousavinezhadhouri barriersofcriticalthinkinginmedicalstudentscurriculumfromtheviewpointofmedicaleducationexpertsaqualitativestudy