Cargando…
Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data
DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark with important regulatory roles in cellular identity and can be quantified at base resolution using bisulfite sequencing. Most studies are limited to the average DNA methylation levels of individual CpGs and thus neglect heterogeneity within the profiled cell po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa120 |
_version_ | 1783528041801056256 |
---|---|
author | Scherer, Michael Nebel, Almut Franke, Andre Walter, Jörn Lengauer, Thomas Bock, Christoph Müller, Fabian List, Markus |
author_facet | Scherer, Michael Nebel, Almut Franke, Andre Walter, Jörn Lengauer, Thomas Bock, Christoph Müller, Fabian List, Markus |
author_sort | Scherer, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark with important regulatory roles in cellular identity and can be quantified at base resolution using bisulfite sequencing. Most studies are limited to the average DNA methylation levels of individual CpGs and thus neglect heterogeneity within the profiled cell populations. To assess this within-sample heterogeneity (WSH) several window-based scores that quantify variability in DNA methylation in sequencing reads have been proposed. We performed the first systematic comparison of four published WSH scores based on simulated and publicly available datasets. Moreover, we propose two new scores and provide guidelines for selecting appropriate scores to address cell-type heterogeneity, cellular contamination and allele-specific methylation. Most of the measures were sensitive in detecting DNA methylation heterogeneity in these scenarios, while we detected differences in susceptibility to technical bias. Using recently published DNA methylation profiles of Ewing sarcoma samples, we show that DNA methylation heterogeneity provides information complementary to the DNA methylation level. WSH scores are powerful tools for estimating variance in DNA methylation patterns and have the potential for detecting novel disease-associated genomic loci not captured by established statistics. We provide an R-package implementing the WSH scores for integration into analysis workflows. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7192612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71926122020-05-06 Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data Scherer, Michael Nebel, Almut Franke, Andre Walter, Jörn Lengauer, Thomas Bock, Christoph Müller, Fabian List, Markus Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark with important regulatory roles in cellular identity and can be quantified at base resolution using bisulfite sequencing. Most studies are limited to the average DNA methylation levels of individual CpGs and thus neglect heterogeneity within the profiled cell populations. To assess this within-sample heterogeneity (WSH) several window-based scores that quantify variability in DNA methylation in sequencing reads have been proposed. We performed the first systematic comparison of four published WSH scores based on simulated and publicly available datasets. Moreover, we propose two new scores and provide guidelines for selecting appropriate scores to address cell-type heterogeneity, cellular contamination and allele-specific methylation. Most of the measures were sensitive in detecting DNA methylation heterogeneity in these scenarios, while we detected differences in susceptibility to technical bias. Using recently published DNA methylation profiles of Ewing sarcoma samples, we show that DNA methylation heterogeneity provides information complementary to the DNA methylation level. WSH scores are powerful tools for estimating variance in DNA methylation patterns and have the potential for detecting novel disease-associated genomic loci not captured by established statistics. We provide an R-package implementing the WSH scores for integration into analysis workflows. Oxford University Press 2020-05-07 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7192612/ /pubmed/32103242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa120 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Scherer, Michael Nebel, Almut Franke, Andre Walter, Jörn Lengauer, Thomas Bock, Christoph Müller, Fabian List, Markus Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data |
title | Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data |
title_full | Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data |
title_fullStr | Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data |
title_short | Quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for DNA methylation data |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of within-sample heterogeneity scores for dna methylation data |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scherermichael quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT nebelalmut quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT frankeandre quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT walterjorn quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT lengauerthomas quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT bockchristoph quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT mullerfabian quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata AT listmarkus quantitativecomparisonofwithinsampleheterogeneityscoresfordnamethylationdata |