Cargando…

The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks

This research evaluate the influence of different oil sources, namely fish oil (FO), coconut oil (CocO), canola oil (CanO), or a mixture of the three oils (MTO)—included at 1.5% in broiler diets—compared to a no oil-supplemented diet. Hence, 250 unsexed, 1-day-old Cobb chicks were weighed and random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attia, Youssef A., Al-Harthi, Mohammed A., Abo El-Maaty, Hayam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7198761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00181
_version_ 1783529051384709120
author Attia, Youssef A.
Al-Harthi, Mohammed A.
Abo El-Maaty, Hayam M.
author_facet Attia, Youssef A.
Al-Harthi, Mohammed A.
Abo El-Maaty, Hayam M.
author_sort Attia, Youssef A.
collection PubMed
description This research evaluate the influence of different oil sources, namely fish oil (FO), coconut oil (CocO), canola oil (CanO), or a mixture of the three oils (MTO)—included at 1.5% in broiler diets—compared to a no oil-supplemented diet. Hence, 250 unsexed, 1-day-old Cobb chicks were weighed and randomly allocated into five dietary treatment groups of 50 chicks each and five replicates per group. Oil-supplemented diets significantly increased the growth, improved the feed conversion ratio (FCR), and decreased the abdominal fat percentage compared to the control diet. Amylase was significantly elevated due to feeding the FO- or CocO-supplemented-diet compared to the control diet, whereas lipase increased due to offering CocO- and CanO-enriched diet; chymotrypsin increased due to different oil sources. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased markedly due to offering an oil-supplemented diet, but low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio, and malondialdehyde (MDA) decreased. Blood plasma immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM significantly increased due to feeding CocO, CanO, or MTO compared to the control group, whereas FO increased IgG only. FO- and CanO-containing diets resulted in the highest increase in α2-globulin and γ-globulin. The antibody titer to avian influenza (HIAI) and Newcastle disease (HIND) were significantly elevated due to CocO supplementation compared to the control group. The bursa follicle length and width and thymus cortex depth were increased considerably due to the FO-supplemented diet compared to the control, but the follicle length:width ratio decreased. The villus height:depth ratio was significantly elevated due to both the CanO and MTO diets. The antioxidant status improved considerably due to the addition of CocO and CanO. Both CanO and MTO similarly increased plasma T3, T4, and the T3:T4 ratio. In conclusion, oil supplementations at 1.5% enhanced growth performance and immune status, improved the blood lipid profile and antioxidants status, and the effect of the oil sources depends on the criteria of response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7198761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71987612020-05-14 The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks Attia, Youssef A. Al-Harthi, Mohammed A. Abo El-Maaty, Hayam M. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science This research evaluate the influence of different oil sources, namely fish oil (FO), coconut oil (CocO), canola oil (CanO), or a mixture of the three oils (MTO)—included at 1.5% in broiler diets—compared to a no oil-supplemented diet. Hence, 250 unsexed, 1-day-old Cobb chicks were weighed and randomly allocated into five dietary treatment groups of 50 chicks each and five replicates per group. Oil-supplemented diets significantly increased the growth, improved the feed conversion ratio (FCR), and decreased the abdominal fat percentage compared to the control diet. Amylase was significantly elevated due to feeding the FO- or CocO-supplemented-diet compared to the control diet, whereas lipase increased due to offering CocO- and CanO-enriched diet; chymotrypsin increased due to different oil sources. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased markedly due to offering an oil-supplemented diet, but low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio, and malondialdehyde (MDA) decreased. Blood plasma immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM significantly increased due to feeding CocO, CanO, or MTO compared to the control group, whereas FO increased IgG only. FO- and CanO-containing diets resulted in the highest increase in α2-globulin and γ-globulin. The antibody titer to avian influenza (HIAI) and Newcastle disease (HIND) were significantly elevated due to CocO supplementation compared to the control group. The bursa follicle length and width and thymus cortex depth were increased considerably due to the FO-supplemented diet compared to the control, but the follicle length:width ratio decreased. The villus height:depth ratio was significantly elevated due to both the CanO and MTO diets. The antioxidant status improved considerably due to the addition of CocO and CanO. Both CanO and MTO similarly increased plasma T3, T4, and the T3:T4 ratio. In conclusion, oil supplementations at 1.5% enhanced growth performance and immune status, improved the blood lipid profile and antioxidants status, and the effect of the oil sources depends on the criteria of response. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7198761/ /pubmed/32411732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00181 Text en Copyright © 2020 Attia, Al-Harthi and Abo El-Maaty. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Attia, Youssef A.
Al-Harthi, Mohammed A.
Abo El-Maaty, Hayam M.
The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks
title The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks
title_full The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks
title_fullStr The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks
title_short The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks
title_sort effects of different oil sources on performance, digestive enzymes, carcass traits, biochemical, immunological, antioxidant, and morphometric responses of broiler chicks
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7198761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00181
work_keys_str_mv AT attiayoussefa theeffectsofdifferentoilsourcesonperformancedigestiveenzymescarcasstraitsbiochemicalimmunologicalantioxidantandmorphometricresponsesofbroilerchicks
AT alharthimohammeda theeffectsofdifferentoilsourcesonperformancedigestiveenzymescarcasstraitsbiochemicalimmunologicalantioxidantandmorphometricresponsesofbroilerchicks
AT aboelmaatyhayamm theeffectsofdifferentoilsourcesonperformancedigestiveenzymescarcasstraitsbiochemicalimmunologicalantioxidantandmorphometricresponsesofbroilerchicks
AT attiayoussefa effectsofdifferentoilsourcesonperformancedigestiveenzymescarcasstraitsbiochemicalimmunologicalantioxidantandmorphometricresponsesofbroilerchicks
AT alharthimohammeda effectsofdifferentoilsourcesonperformancedigestiveenzymescarcasstraitsbiochemicalimmunologicalantioxidantandmorphometricresponsesofbroilerchicks
AT aboelmaatyhayamm effectsofdifferentoilsourcesonperformancedigestiveenzymescarcasstraitsbiochemicalimmunologicalantioxidantandmorphometricresponsesofbroilerchicks