Cargando…

Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide studies of DNA methylation across the epigenetic landscape provide insights into the heterogeneity of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Differentiating into embryonic somatic and germ cells, ESCs exhibit varying degrees of pluripotency, and epigenetic changes occurring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joe, Soobok, Nam, Hojung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32366211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3448-3
_version_ 1783529147080900608
author Joe, Soobok
Nam, Hojung
author_facet Joe, Soobok
Nam, Hojung
author_sort Joe, Soobok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome-wide studies of DNA methylation across the epigenetic landscape provide insights into the heterogeneity of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Differentiating into embryonic somatic and germ cells, ESCs exhibit varying degrees of pluripotency, and epigenetic changes occurring in this process have emerged as important factors explaining stem cell pluripotency. RESULTS: Here, using paired scBS-seq and scRNA-seq data of mice, we constructed a machine learning model that predicts degrees of pluripotency for mouse ESCs. Since the biological activities of non-CpG markers have yet to be clarified, we tested the predictive power of CpG and non-CpG markers, as well as a combination thereof, in the model. Through rigorous performance evaluation with both internal and external validation, we discovered that a model using both CpG and non-CpG markers predicted the pluripotency of ESCs with the highest prediction performance (0.956 AUC, external test). The prediction model consisted of 16 CpG and 33 non-CpG markers. The CpG and most of the non-CpG markers targeted depletions of methylation and were indicative of cell pluripotency, whereas only a few non-CpG markers reflected accumulations of methylation. Additionally, we confirmed that there exists the differing pluripotency between individual developmental stages, such as E3.5 and E6.5, as well as between induced mouse pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) and somatic cell. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we investigated CpG and non-CpG methylation in relation to mouse stem cell pluripotency and developed a model thereon that successfully predicts the pluripotency of mouse ESCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7199378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71993782020-05-08 Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers Joe, Soobok Nam, Hojung BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Genome-wide studies of DNA methylation across the epigenetic landscape provide insights into the heterogeneity of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Differentiating into embryonic somatic and germ cells, ESCs exhibit varying degrees of pluripotency, and epigenetic changes occurring in this process have emerged as important factors explaining stem cell pluripotency. RESULTS: Here, using paired scBS-seq and scRNA-seq data of mice, we constructed a machine learning model that predicts degrees of pluripotency for mouse ESCs. Since the biological activities of non-CpG markers have yet to be clarified, we tested the predictive power of CpG and non-CpG markers, as well as a combination thereof, in the model. Through rigorous performance evaluation with both internal and external validation, we discovered that a model using both CpG and non-CpG markers predicted the pluripotency of ESCs with the highest prediction performance (0.956 AUC, external test). The prediction model consisted of 16 CpG and 33 non-CpG markers. The CpG and most of the non-CpG markers targeted depletions of methylation and were indicative of cell pluripotency, whereas only a few non-CpG markers reflected accumulations of methylation. Additionally, we confirmed that there exists the differing pluripotency between individual developmental stages, such as E3.5 and E6.5, as well as between induced mouse pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) and somatic cell. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we investigated CpG and non-CpG methylation in relation to mouse stem cell pluripotency and developed a model thereon that successfully predicts the pluripotency of mouse ESCs. BioMed Central 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7199378/ /pubmed/32366211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3448-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Joe, Soobok
Nam, Hojung
Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
title Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
title_full Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
title_fullStr Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
title_full_unstemmed Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
title_short Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
title_sort prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using cpg and non-cpg dna methylation markers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32366211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3448-3
work_keys_str_mv AT joesoobok predictionmodelconstructionofmousestemcellpluripotencyusingcpgandnoncpgdnamethylationmarkers
AT namhojung predictionmodelconstructionofmousestemcellpluripotencyusingcpgandnoncpgdnamethylationmarkers