Cargando…

Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality

The demand for a year-round supply of fresh, locally grown, forage-finished beef products has created a need for forage-finishing strategies during the summer months in the southeast. A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate four warm-season annual forages in a southeastern forage-finishing beef produ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harmon, Deidre D, Hancock, Dennis W, Stewart, Robert L, Lacey, Jenna L, Mckee, Robert W, Hale, John D, Thomas, Chevise L, Ford, Elyse, Segers, Jacob R, Teutsch, Chris D, Stelzleni, Alexander M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz075
_version_ 1783529435774844928
author Harmon, Deidre D
Hancock, Dennis W
Stewart, Robert L
Lacey, Jenna L
Mckee, Robert W
Hale, John D
Thomas, Chevise L
Ford, Elyse
Segers, Jacob R
Teutsch, Chris D
Stelzleni, Alexander M
author_facet Harmon, Deidre D
Hancock, Dennis W
Stewart, Robert L
Lacey, Jenna L
Mckee, Robert W
Hale, John D
Thomas, Chevise L
Ford, Elyse
Segers, Jacob R
Teutsch, Chris D
Stelzleni, Alexander M
author_sort Harmon, Deidre D
collection PubMed
description The demand for a year-round supply of fresh, locally grown, forage-finished beef products has created a need for forage-finishing strategies during the summer months in the southeast. A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate four warm-season annual forages in a southeastern forage-finishing beef production system. Treatments were four forage species and included brown-midrib sorghum × sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor var. bicolor*bicolor var. sudanense; BMR), sorghum × sudangrass (SS), pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.; PM], or pearl millet planted with crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.; PMCG]. Treatments were distributed in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Pastures (0.81 ha, experimental unit) were assigned to one of four forage treatments, subdivided, and rotationally stocked with a variable stocking density. British-cross beef steers (n = 32; 3-yr average: 429 ± 22 kg) grazed for 70, 63, and 56 d in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Put-and-take animals were used to maintain a forage allowance of 116 kg forage dry matter /100 kg body weight. Forage mass was measured by clipping a 4.3-m(2) area in triplicate on d 0 and on 14-d intervals. Hand grab samples for forage nutritive value determination and quadrat clippings for species compositions were measured on d 0 and on 34-d intervals until termination of the trial. Forage mass was lowest (P < 0.01) for PMCG at the initiation of the grazing trial, whereas BMR was greater (P < 0.01) than SS at wk 6. Total digestible nutrients in 2014 were greater for SS compared to BMR and PM at the middle harvest (P < 0.01) and BMR, PM, and PMCG at the final harvest (P < 0.01). At the middle and final harvests in both 2015 and 2016, PM and PMCG contained greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of crude protein than SS. These results suggest that BMR, SS, PM, and PMCG may all be used in southeastern forage-finishing beef production systems, as long as the producer strategically accounts for the slight growth and nutritive value differences throughout the season.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7200908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72009082020-07-22 Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality Harmon, Deidre D Hancock, Dennis W Stewart, Robert L Lacey, Jenna L Mckee, Robert W Hale, John D Thomas, Chevise L Ford, Elyse Segers, Jacob R Teutsch, Chris D Stelzleni, Alexander M Transl Anim Sci Forage Based Livestock Systems The demand for a year-round supply of fresh, locally grown, forage-finished beef products has created a need for forage-finishing strategies during the summer months in the southeast. A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate four warm-season annual forages in a southeastern forage-finishing beef production system. Treatments were four forage species and included brown-midrib sorghum × sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor var. bicolor*bicolor var. sudanense; BMR), sorghum × sudangrass (SS), pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.; PM], or pearl millet planted with crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.; PMCG]. Treatments were distributed in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Pastures (0.81 ha, experimental unit) were assigned to one of four forage treatments, subdivided, and rotationally stocked with a variable stocking density. British-cross beef steers (n = 32; 3-yr average: 429 ± 22 kg) grazed for 70, 63, and 56 d in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Put-and-take animals were used to maintain a forage allowance of 116 kg forage dry matter /100 kg body weight. Forage mass was measured by clipping a 4.3-m(2) area in triplicate on d 0 and on 14-d intervals. Hand grab samples for forage nutritive value determination and quadrat clippings for species compositions were measured on d 0 and on 34-d intervals until termination of the trial. Forage mass was lowest (P < 0.01) for PMCG at the initiation of the grazing trial, whereas BMR was greater (P < 0.01) than SS at wk 6. Total digestible nutrients in 2014 were greater for SS compared to BMR and PM at the middle harvest (P < 0.01) and BMR, PM, and PMCG at the final harvest (P < 0.01). At the middle and final harvests in both 2015 and 2016, PM and PMCG contained greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of crude protein than SS. These results suggest that BMR, SS, PM, and PMCG may all be used in southeastern forage-finishing beef production systems, as long as the producer strategically accounts for the slight growth and nutritive value differences throughout the season. Oxford University Press 2019-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7200908/ /pubmed/32704856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz075 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Forage Based Livestock Systems
Harmon, Deidre D
Hancock, Dennis W
Stewart, Robert L
Lacey, Jenna L
Mckee, Robert W
Hale, John D
Thomas, Chevise L
Ford, Elyse
Segers, Jacob R
Teutsch, Chris D
Stelzleni, Alexander M
Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
title Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
title_full Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
title_fullStr Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
title_full_unstemmed Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
title_short Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
title_sort warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: i. forage yield and quality
topic Forage Based Livestock Systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz075
work_keys_str_mv AT harmondeidred warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT hancockdennisw warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT stewartrobertl warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT laceyjennal warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT mckeerobertw warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT halejohnd warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT thomaschevisel warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT fordelyse warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT segersjacobr warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT teutschchrisd warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality
AT stelzlenialexanderm warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality