Cargando…
Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
The demand for a year-round supply of fresh, locally grown, forage-finished beef products has created a need for forage-finishing strategies during the summer months in the southeast. A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate four warm-season annual forages in a southeastern forage-finishing beef produ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz075 |
_version_ | 1783529435774844928 |
---|---|
author | Harmon, Deidre D Hancock, Dennis W Stewart, Robert L Lacey, Jenna L Mckee, Robert W Hale, John D Thomas, Chevise L Ford, Elyse Segers, Jacob R Teutsch, Chris D Stelzleni, Alexander M |
author_facet | Harmon, Deidre D Hancock, Dennis W Stewart, Robert L Lacey, Jenna L Mckee, Robert W Hale, John D Thomas, Chevise L Ford, Elyse Segers, Jacob R Teutsch, Chris D Stelzleni, Alexander M |
author_sort | Harmon, Deidre D |
collection | PubMed |
description | The demand for a year-round supply of fresh, locally grown, forage-finished beef products has created a need for forage-finishing strategies during the summer months in the southeast. A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate four warm-season annual forages in a southeastern forage-finishing beef production system. Treatments were four forage species and included brown-midrib sorghum × sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor var. bicolor*bicolor var. sudanense; BMR), sorghum × sudangrass (SS), pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.; PM], or pearl millet planted with crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.; PMCG]. Treatments were distributed in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Pastures (0.81 ha, experimental unit) were assigned to one of four forage treatments, subdivided, and rotationally stocked with a variable stocking density. British-cross beef steers (n = 32; 3-yr average: 429 ± 22 kg) grazed for 70, 63, and 56 d in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Put-and-take animals were used to maintain a forage allowance of 116 kg forage dry matter /100 kg body weight. Forage mass was measured by clipping a 4.3-m(2) area in triplicate on d 0 and on 14-d intervals. Hand grab samples for forage nutritive value determination and quadrat clippings for species compositions were measured on d 0 and on 34-d intervals until termination of the trial. Forage mass was lowest (P < 0.01) for PMCG at the initiation of the grazing trial, whereas BMR was greater (P < 0.01) than SS at wk 6. Total digestible nutrients in 2014 were greater for SS compared to BMR and PM at the middle harvest (P < 0.01) and BMR, PM, and PMCG at the final harvest (P < 0.01). At the middle and final harvests in both 2015 and 2016, PM and PMCG contained greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of crude protein than SS. These results suggest that BMR, SS, PM, and PMCG may all be used in southeastern forage-finishing beef production systems, as long as the producer strategically accounts for the slight growth and nutritive value differences throughout the season. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7200908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72009082020-07-22 Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality Harmon, Deidre D Hancock, Dennis W Stewart, Robert L Lacey, Jenna L Mckee, Robert W Hale, John D Thomas, Chevise L Ford, Elyse Segers, Jacob R Teutsch, Chris D Stelzleni, Alexander M Transl Anim Sci Forage Based Livestock Systems The demand for a year-round supply of fresh, locally grown, forage-finished beef products has created a need for forage-finishing strategies during the summer months in the southeast. A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate four warm-season annual forages in a southeastern forage-finishing beef production system. Treatments were four forage species and included brown-midrib sorghum × sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor var. bicolor*bicolor var. sudanense; BMR), sorghum × sudangrass (SS), pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.; PM], or pearl millet planted with crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.; PMCG]. Treatments were distributed in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Pastures (0.81 ha, experimental unit) were assigned to one of four forage treatments, subdivided, and rotationally stocked with a variable stocking density. British-cross beef steers (n = 32; 3-yr average: 429 ± 22 kg) grazed for 70, 63, and 56 d in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Put-and-take animals were used to maintain a forage allowance of 116 kg forage dry matter /100 kg body weight. Forage mass was measured by clipping a 4.3-m(2) area in triplicate on d 0 and on 14-d intervals. Hand grab samples for forage nutritive value determination and quadrat clippings for species compositions were measured on d 0 and on 34-d intervals until termination of the trial. Forage mass was lowest (P < 0.01) for PMCG at the initiation of the grazing trial, whereas BMR was greater (P < 0.01) than SS at wk 6. Total digestible nutrients in 2014 were greater for SS compared to BMR and PM at the middle harvest (P < 0.01) and BMR, PM, and PMCG at the final harvest (P < 0.01). At the middle and final harvests in both 2015 and 2016, PM and PMCG contained greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of crude protein than SS. These results suggest that BMR, SS, PM, and PMCG may all be used in southeastern forage-finishing beef production systems, as long as the producer strategically accounts for the slight growth and nutritive value differences throughout the season. Oxford University Press 2019-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7200908/ /pubmed/32704856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz075 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Forage Based Livestock Systems Harmon, Deidre D Hancock, Dennis W Stewart, Robert L Lacey, Jenna L Mckee, Robert W Hale, John D Thomas, Chevise L Ford, Elyse Segers, Jacob R Teutsch, Chris D Stelzleni, Alexander M Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality |
title | Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality |
title_full | Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality |
title_fullStr | Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality |
title_short | Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality |
title_sort | warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: i. forage yield and quality |
topic | Forage Based Livestock Systems |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7200908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harmondeidred warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT hancockdennisw warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT stewartrobertl warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT laceyjennal warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT mckeerobertw warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT halejohnd warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT thomaschevisel warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT fordelyse warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT segersjacobr warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT teutschchrisd warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality AT stelzlenialexanderm warmseasonannualforagesinforagefinishingbeefsystemsiforageyieldandquality |