Cargando…

Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes

BACKGROUND: Exploration and modelling of heterogeneous treatment effects as a function of baseline covariates is an important aspect of precision medicine in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Randomisation generally guarantees the internal validity of an RCT, but heterogeneity in treatment effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, James A., Holmes, Chris C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04306-1
_version_ 1783530022910296064
author Watson, James A.
Holmes, Chris C.
author_facet Watson, James A.
Holmes, Chris C.
author_sort Watson, James A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exploration and modelling of heterogeneous treatment effects as a function of baseline covariates is an important aspect of precision medicine in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Randomisation generally guarantees the internal validity of an RCT, but heterogeneity in treatment effect can reduce external validity. Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects is usually done via a predictive model for individual outcomes, where one searches for interactions between treatment allocation and important patient baseline covariates. However, such models are prone to overfitting and multiple testing and typically demand a transformation of the outcome measurement, for example, from the absolute risk in the original RCT to log-odds of risk in the predictive model. METHODS: We show how reference classes derived from baseline covariates can be used to explore heterogeneous treatment effects via a two-stage approach. We first estimate a risk score which captures on a single dimension some of the heterogeneity in outcomes of the trial population. Heterogeneity in the treatment effect can then be explored via reweighting schemes along this axis of variation. This two-stage approach bypasses the search for interactions with multiple covariates, thus protecting against multiple testing. It also allows for exploration of heterogeneous treatment effects on the original outcome scale of the RCT. This approach would typically be applied to multivariable models of baseline risk to assess the stability of average treatment effects with respect to the distribution of risk in the population studied. CASE STUDY: We illustrate this approach using the single largest randomised treatment trial in severe falciparum malaria and demonstrate how the estimated treatment effect in terms of absolute mortality risk reduction increases considerably in higher risk strata. CONCLUSIONS: ‘Local’ and ‘tilting’ reweighting schemes based on ranking patients by baseline risk can be used as a general approach for exploring, graphing and reporting heterogeneity of treatment effect in RCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN clinical trials registry: ISRCTN50258054. Prospectively registered on 22 July 2005.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7204233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72042332020-05-12 Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes Watson, James A. Holmes, Chris C. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Exploration and modelling of heterogeneous treatment effects as a function of baseline covariates is an important aspect of precision medicine in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Randomisation generally guarantees the internal validity of an RCT, but heterogeneity in treatment effect can reduce external validity. Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects is usually done via a predictive model for individual outcomes, where one searches for interactions between treatment allocation and important patient baseline covariates. However, such models are prone to overfitting and multiple testing and typically demand a transformation of the outcome measurement, for example, from the absolute risk in the original RCT to log-odds of risk in the predictive model. METHODS: We show how reference classes derived from baseline covariates can be used to explore heterogeneous treatment effects via a two-stage approach. We first estimate a risk score which captures on a single dimension some of the heterogeneity in outcomes of the trial population. Heterogeneity in the treatment effect can then be explored via reweighting schemes along this axis of variation. This two-stage approach bypasses the search for interactions with multiple covariates, thus protecting against multiple testing. It also allows for exploration of heterogeneous treatment effects on the original outcome scale of the RCT. This approach would typically be applied to multivariable models of baseline risk to assess the stability of average treatment effects with respect to the distribution of risk in the population studied. CASE STUDY: We illustrate this approach using the single largest randomised treatment trial in severe falciparum malaria and demonstrate how the estimated treatment effect in terms of absolute mortality risk reduction increases considerably in higher risk strata. CONCLUSIONS: ‘Local’ and ‘tilting’ reweighting schemes based on ranking patients by baseline risk can be used as a general approach for exploring, graphing and reporting heterogeneity of treatment effect in RCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN clinical trials registry: ISRCTN50258054. Prospectively registered on 22 July 2005. BioMed Central 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7204233/ /pubmed/32381030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04306-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Watson, James A.
Holmes, Chris C.
Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
title Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
title_full Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
title_fullStr Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
title_full_unstemmed Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
title_short Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
title_sort graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04306-1
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonjamesa graphingandreportingheterogeneoustreatmenteffectsthroughreferenceclasses
AT holmeschrisc graphingandreportingheterogeneoustreatmenteffectsthroughreferenceclasses