Cargando…

Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There are few studies that directly compared different interventions to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning for dermatologic conditions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of adding practice with reflection and immediate feedback on traditional dermatology electives in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Sungjun, Oh, Sohee, Lee, Dong Hun, Yoon, Hyun-Sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02063-y
_version_ 1783530486941876224
author Choi, Sungjun
Oh, Sohee
Lee, Dong Hun
Yoon, Hyun-Sun
author_facet Choi, Sungjun
Oh, Sohee
Lee, Dong Hun
Yoon, Hyun-Sun
author_sort Choi, Sungjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are few studies that directly compared different interventions to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning for dermatologic conditions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of adding practice with reflection and immediate feedback on traditional dermatology electives in improving medical students’ ability in evaluating skin lesions. METHODS: The participants were fourth-year medical students of Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea, who were enrolled to take a 2-week dermatology elective course (n = 87). Students were assigned to one of the three educational interventions: 2-h training involving 10 written clinical cases (experimental); 1-h lecture and 1-h outpatient clinic (lecture); and 2-h outpatient clinic (no intervention). Before and at the end of rotation, diagnostic accuracy was estimated using 20 written clinical cases with photographs (10 novel cases presented in diagnostic training [training set], 10 cases with diagnoses not included in training [control set]). RESULTS: There was a significant interaction effect of intervention×set×time. A post hoc analysis indicated that the students in the experimental group outperformed students in the other two groups only in the training set of the final tests; after completing the 2-week rotation, for the training set, the mean score was higher in the experimental group (7.5 ± 1.3) than in the lecture (5.7 ± 1.6) and no intervention (5.6 ± 1.3) groups, producing an effect size of 1.2 standard deviation (SD) and 1.5 SD, respectively. CONCLUSION: Practicing written clinical cases with reflection and feedback is superior to a lecture-based approach and yields additional benefits to a dermatology elective, thereby enhancing medical students’ ability to accurately diagnose skin lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03472001. Registered 21 March 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7206810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72068102020-05-15 Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial Choi, Sungjun Oh, Sohee Lee, Dong Hun Yoon, Hyun-Sun BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: There are few studies that directly compared different interventions to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning for dermatologic conditions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of adding practice with reflection and immediate feedback on traditional dermatology electives in improving medical students’ ability in evaluating skin lesions. METHODS: The participants were fourth-year medical students of Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea, who were enrolled to take a 2-week dermatology elective course (n = 87). Students were assigned to one of the three educational interventions: 2-h training involving 10 written clinical cases (experimental); 1-h lecture and 1-h outpatient clinic (lecture); and 2-h outpatient clinic (no intervention). Before and at the end of rotation, diagnostic accuracy was estimated using 20 written clinical cases with photographs (10 novel cases presented in diagnostic training [training set], 10 cases with diagnoses not included in training [control set]). RESULTS: There was a significant interaction effect of intervention×set×time. A post hoc analysis indicated that the students in the experimental group outperformed students in the other two groups only in the training set of the final tests; after completing the 2-week rotation, for the training set, the mean score was higher in the experimental group (7.5 ± 1.3) than in the lecture (5.7 ± 1.6) and no intervention (5.6 ± 1.3) groups, producing an effect size of 1.2 standard deviation (SD) and 1.5 SD, respectively. CONCLUSION: Practicing written clinical cases with reflection and feedback is superior to a lecture-based approach and yields additional benefits to a dermatology elective, thereby enhancing medical students’ ability to accurately diagnose skin lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03472001. Registered 21 March 2018. BioMed Central 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7206810/ /pubmed/32384885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02063-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Sungjun
Oh, Sohee
Lee, Dong Hun
Yoon, Hyun-Sun
Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
title Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effects of reflection and immediate feedback to improve clinical reasoning of medical students in the assessment of dermatologic conditions: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7206810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02063-y
work_keys_str_mv AT choisungjun effectsofreflectionandimmediatefeedbacktoimproveclinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsintheassessmentofdermatologicconditionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ohsohee effectsofreflectionandimmediatefeedbacktoimproveclinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsintheassessmentofdermatologicconditionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leedonghun effectsofreflectionandimmediatefeedbacktoimproveclinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsintheassessmentofdermatologicconditionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yoonhyunsun effectsofreflectionandimmediatefeedbacktoimproveclinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsintheassessmentofdermatologicconditionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial