Cargando…
Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone
Understanding the in vivo fate of vaccine antigens and adjuvants and their safety is crucial for the rational design of mucosal subunit vaccines. Prime and pull vaccination using the T helper 17-inducing adjuvant CAF01 administered parenterally and mucosally, respectively, has previously been sugges...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00803 |
_version_ | 1783533318929645568 |
---|---|
author | Thakur, Aneesh Pinto, Fernanda Endringer Hansen, Harald Severin Andersen, Peter Christensen, Dennis Janfelt, Christian Foged, Camilla |
author_facet | Thakur, Aneesh Pinto, Fernanda Endringer Hansen, Harald Severin Andersen, Peter Christensen, Dennis Janfelt, Christian Foged, Camilla |
author_sort | Thakur, Aneesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding the in vivo fate of vaccine antigens and adjuvants and their safety is crucial for the rational design of mucosal subunit vaccines. Prime and pull vaccination using the T helper 17-inducing adjuvant CAF01 administered parenterally and mucosally, respectively, has previously been suggested as a promising strategy to redirect immunity to mucosal tissues. Recently, we reported a promising tuberculosis (TB) vaccination strategy comprising of parenteral priming followed by intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) mucosal pull immunization with the TB subunit vaccine candidate H56/CAF01, which resulted in the induction of lung-localized, H56-specific T cells and systemic as well as lung mucosal IgA responses. Here, we investigate the uptake of H56/CAF01 by mucosal and systemic innate myeloid cells, antigen-presenting cells (APCs), lung epithelial cells and endothelial cells in mice after parenteral prime combined with i.pulmon. pull immunization, and after parenteral or i.pulmon. prime immunization alone. We find that i.pulmon. pull immunization of mice with H56/CAF01, which are parenterally primed with H56/CAF01, substantially enhances vaccine uptake and presentation by pulmonary and splenic APCs, pulmonary endothelial cells and type I epithelial cells and induces stronger activation of dendritic cells in the lung-draining lymph nodes, compared with parenteral immunization alone, which suggests activation of both innate and memory responses. Using mass spectrometry imaging of lipid biomarkers, we further show that (i) airway mucosal immunization with H56/CAF01 neither induces apparent local tissue damage nor inflammation in the lungs, and (ii) the presence of CAF01 is accompanied by evidence of an altered phagocytic activity in alveolar macrophages, evident from co-localization of CAF01 with the biomarker bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate, which is expressed in the late endosomes and lysosomes of phagocytosing macrophages. Hence, our data demonstrate that innate myeloid responses differ after one and two immunizations, respectively, and the priming route and boosting route individually affect this outcome. These findings may have important implications for the design of mucosal vaccines intended for safe administration in the airways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7221191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72211912020-05-25 Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone Thakur, Aneesh Pinto, Fernanda Endringer Hansen, Harald Severin Andersen, Peter Christensen, Dennis Janfelt, Christian Foged, Camilla Front Immunol Immunology Understanding the in vivo fate of vaccine antigens and adjuvants and their safety is crucial for the rational design of mucosal subunit vaccines. Prime and pull vaccination using the T helper 17-inducing adjuvant CAF01 administered parenterally and mucosally, respectively, has previously been suggested as a promising strategy to redirect immunity to mucosal tissues. Recently, we reported a promising tuberculosis (TB) vaccination strategy comprising of parenteral priming followed by intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) mucosal pull immunization with the TB subunit vaccine candidate H56/CAF01, which resulted in the induction of lung-localized, H56-specific T cells and systemic as well as lung mucosal IgA responses. Here, we investigate the uptake of H56/CAF01 by mucosal and systemic innate myeloid cells, antigen-presenting cells (APCs), lung epithelial cells and endothelial cells in mice after parenteral prime combined with i.pulmon. pull immunization, and after parenteral or i.pulmon. prime immunization alone. We find that i.pulmon. pull immunization of mice with H56/CAF01, which are parenterally primed with H56/CAF01, substantially enhances vaccine uptake and presentation by pulmonary and splenic APCs, pulmonary endothelial cells and type I epithelial cells and induces stronger activation of dendritic cells in the lung-draining lymph nodes, compared with parenteral immunization alone, which suggests activation of both innate and memory responses. Using mass spectrometry imaging of lipid biomarkers, we further show that (i) airway mucosal immunization with H56/CAF01 neither induces apparent local tissue damage nor inflammation in the lungs, and (ii) the presence of CAF01 is accompanied by evidence of an altered phagocytic activity in alveolar macrophages, evident from co-localization of CAF01 with the biomarker bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate, which is expressed in the late endosomes and lysosomes of phagocytosing macrophages. Hence, our data demonstrate that innate myeloid responses differ after one and two immunizations, respectively, and the priming route and boosting route individually affect this outcome. These findings may have important implications for the design of mucosal vaccines intended for safe administration in the airways. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7221191/ /pubmed/32457748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00803 Text en Copyright © 2020 Thakur, Pinto, Hansen, Andersen, Christensen, Janfelt and Foged. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Thakur, Aneesh Pinto, Fernanda Endringer Hansen, Harald Severin Andersen, Peter Christensen, Dennis Janfelt, Christian Foged, Camilla Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone |
title | Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone |
title_full | Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone |
title_fullStr | Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone |
title_short | Intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) Pull Immunization With the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine Candidate H56/CAF01 After Intramuscular (i.m.) Priming Elicits a Distinct Innate Myeloid Response and Activation of Antigen-Presenting Cells Than i.m. or i.pulmon. Prime Immunization Alone |
title_sort | intrapulmonary (i.pulmon.) pull immunization with the tuberculosis subunit vaccine candidate h56/caf01 after intramuscular (i.m.) priming elicits a distinct innate myeloid response and activation of antigen-presenting cells than i.m. or i.pulmon. prime immunization alone |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thakuraneesh intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone AT pintofernandaendringer intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone AT hansenharaldseverin intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone AT andersenpeter intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone AT christensendennis intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone AT janfeltchristian intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone AT fogedcamilla intrapulmonaryipulmonpullimmunizationwiththetuberculosissubunitvaccinecandidateh56caf01afterintramuscularimprimingelicitsadistinctinnatemyeloidresponseandactivationofantigenpresentingcellsthanimoripulmonprimeimmunizationalone |