Cargando…
Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion
ABSTRACT: Process intensification and integration is crucial regarding an ever increasing pressure on manufacturing costs and capacities in biologics manufacturing. For virus production in perfusion mode, membrane-based alternating tangential flow filtration (ATF) and acoustic settler are the common...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10596-x |
_version_ | 1783534655313543168 |
---|---|
author | Gränicher, Gwendal Coronel, Juliana Trampler, Felix Jordan, Ingo Genzel, Yvonne Reichl, Udo |
author_facet | Gränicher, Gwendal Coronel, Juliana Trampler, Felix Jordan, Ingo Genzel, Yvonne Reichl, Udo |
author_sort | Gränicher, Gwendal |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Process intensification and integration is crucial regarding an ever increasing pressure on manufacturing costs and capacities in biologics manufacturing. For virus production in perfusion mode, membrane-based alternating tangential flow filtration (ATF) and acoustic settler are the commonly described cell retention technologies. While acoustic settlers allow for continuous influenza virus harvesting, the use of commercially available membranes for ATF systems typically results in the accumulation of virus particles in the bioreactor vessel. Accordingly, with one single harvest at the end of a cultivation, this increases the risk of lowering the product quality. To assess which cell retention device would be most suitable for influenza A virus production, we compared various key performance figures using AGE1.CR.pIX cells at concentrations between 25 and 50 × 10(6) cells/mL at similar infection conditions using either an ATF system or an acoustic settler. Production yields, process-related impurities, and aggregation of viruses and other large molecules were evaluated. Taking into account the total number of virions from both the bioreactor and the harvest vessel, a 1.5–3.0-fold higher volumetric virus yield was obtained for the acoustic settler. In addition, fewer large-sized aggregates (virus particles and other molecules) were observed in the harvest taken directly from the bioreactor. In contrast, similar levels of process-related impurities (host cell dsDNA, total protein) were obtained in the harvest for both retention systems. Overall, a clear advantage was observed for continuous virus harvesting after the acoustic settler operation mode was optimized. This development may also allow direct integration of subsequent downstream processing steps. KEY POINTS: • High suspension cell density, immortalized avian cell line, influenza vaccine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7228903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72289032020-05-18 Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion Gränicher, Gwendal Coronel, Juliana Trampler, Felix Jordan, Ingo Genzel, Yvonne Reichl, Udo Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering ABSTRACT: Process intensification and integration is crucial regarding an ever increasing pressure on manufacturing costs and capacities in biologics manufacturing. For virus production in perfusion mode, membrane-based alternating tangential flow filtration (ATF) and acoustic settler are the commonly described cell retention technologies. While acoustic settlers allow for continuous influenza virus harvesting, the use of commercially available membranes for ATF systems typically results in the accumulation of virus particles in the bioreactor vessel. Accordingly, with one single harvest at the end of a cultivation, this increases the risk of lowering the product quality. To assess which cell retention device would be most suitable for influenza A virus production, we compared various key performance figures using AGE1.CR.pIX cells at concentrations between 25 and 50 × 10(6) cells/mL at similar infection conditions using either an ATF system or an acoustic settler. Production yields, process-related impurities, and aggregation of viruses and other large molecules were evaluated. Taking into account the total number of virions from both the bioreactor and the harvest vessel, a 1.5–3.0-fold higher volumetric virus yield was obtained for the acoustic settler. In addition, fewer large-sized aggregates (virus particles and other molecules) were observed in the harvest taken directly from the bioreactor. In contrast, similar levels of process-related impurities (host cell dsDNA, total protein) were obtained in the harvest for both retention systems. Overall, a clear advantage was observed for continuous virus harvesting after the acoustic settler operation mode was optimized. This development may also allow direct integration of subsequent downstream processing steps. KEY POINTS: • High suspension cell density, immortalized avian cell line, influenza vaccine. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7228903/ /pubmed/32291490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10596-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering Gränicher, Gwendal Coronel, Juliana Trampler, Felix Jordan, Ingo Genzel, Yvonne Reichl, Udo Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
title | Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
title_full | Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
title_fullStr | Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
title_short | Performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based ATF technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
title_sort | performance of an acoustic settler versus a hollow fiber–based atf technology for influenza virus production in perfusion |
topic | Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10596-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granichergwendal performanceofanacousticsettlerversusahollowfiberbasedatftechnologyforinfluenzavirusproductioninperfusion AT coroneljuliana performanceofanacousticsettlerversusahollowfiberbasedatftechnologyforinfluenzavirusproductioninperfusion AT tramplerfelix performanceofanacousticsettlerversusahollowfiberbasedatftechnologyforinfluenzavirusproductioninperfusion AT jordaningo performanceofanacousticsettlerversusahollowfiberbasedatftechnologyforinfluenzavirusproductioninperfusion AT genzelyvonne performanceofanacousticsettlerversusahollowfiberbasedatftechnologyforinfluenzavirusproductioninperfusion AT reichludo performanceofanacousticsettlerversusahollowfiberbasedatftechnologyforinfluenzavirusproductioninperfusion |